We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Calculation of GMP?

I thought that, though having to adhere to government guidelines, a pensions schemes rules dictated the calculation of GMP.


My pension scheme now tells me that the GMP figure will depend on the values they get from HMRC.


Can anyone please throw some light on this?
«1

Comments

  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,371 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    GMP is as notified by HMRC.
  • Thank you xylophone.
    I have looked at the post you mentioned, but my lack of knowledge in this area meant that I couldn't relate this to my situation.
    However, in post #28 you say:


    Any GMP element of a preserved pension must also be revalued, but the method is different to revaluing excess benefits. Currently, trustees have the choice of two different methods of revaluing GMPs: Full Rate increases or Fixed Rate increases. Schemes which opt for increases at Full Rate increase their GMPs annually in line with Section 148 Orders (previously known as Section 21 Orders). Section 148 Orders are based on the increase in the National Average Earnings Index each year.


    I believe that my GMP has increased at a Fixed Rate, and this is why I don't understand why HMRC get involved.
    After all the fixed rate revaluations have occurred , is there then a modification by HMRC?
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,765 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    See post 23 in same thread.

    HMRC get involved whether fixed rate, full rate or any other rate - it is they who supply DWP with the figures.

    You will note that in howy's case, a mistake had occurred and HMRC had initially calculated his figures on the basis that Fixed Rate had been used.

    See post 12 in thread.

    In fact, his scheme used Full Rate which made a difference to his payments.

    He was initially told in 2013 that his COD (fixed rate ) was £133.56 which reduced his pre 97 AP to NIL - in fact, HMRC had advised DWP of the wrong figure. it should have been £98.82 (Full Rate) which gave him AP of a couple of pounds or so.

    With regard to your own situation, have you seen

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/447195/new-state-pension--effect-of-being-contracted-out.pdf

    and

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/512799/your-state-pension-statement-explained-dwp042.pdf
  • I think we've been talking at cross purposes.
    I'm not questioning the COD calculation or anything to do with the State Pension, I was asking about the Occupational Pension calculation.
    As the GMP calculation is done with a fixed interest rate, then isn't this just the same as money put into a fixed interest account; the final sum is dependant on only the initial sum, the interest rate, and the time period.
    The figures previously given to me by the occupational pension scheme have been based on this type of calculation, as far as I know.
    So how do HMRC get involved after this fixed interest calculation has been made - what is it that I am missing?
  • neilvw
    neilvw Posts: 462 Forumite
    The scheme has to reconcile its GMP records with those held by HMRC. In other words they have to agree the starting amount of GMP, before any revaluation is applied.
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,765 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    When the state retirement pension came into payment, HMRC used to send the Scheme member a letter (CA 1627)


    ......our records show that etc etc

    It was accompanied by a sheet detailing the weekly contracted out deduction , the name of the scheme, and the years contracted out.

    However, see

    See https://www.barnett-waddingham.co.uk/media/filer_public/6b/af/6baf547b-4772-4680-bf3a-ce77808e2455/gmp_reconciliation_briefing_note.pdf

    re what is to happen going forwards.
  • So the original value of the GMP held by the pension scheme was different than the value held by HMRC, and this only comes to light at the time the pension is taken (over 30 years later in this case).


    Would this also explain why the Excess over GMP portion has been reduced from a value given 2 months before the pension was to be taken?
  • neilvw
    neilvw Posts: 462 Forumite
    If total scheme benefit is the same, if GMP has gone up the excess might well have gone down.
  • Both the GMP and the Excess over GMP values have been reduced.

    So does this mean that the values given by HMRC can affect the Excess over GMP value?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.