We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pay deductions for breaks I'm not getting

2»

Comments

  • Southend1
    Southend1 Posts: 3,362 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    No requirement for a break on a 6hr shift.

    It may be specified in the contract though. As another poster says, OP needs to get hold of the staff handbook.
  • Kynthia
    Kynthia Posts: 5,692 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Aren't you required to have a 20 minute break if you work over 6 hours?
    Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!
  • M-People
    M-People Posts: 95 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee!
    edited 8 October 2014 at 1:30PM
    Hey guys, thanks for the replies; in response to being forced to take these breaks;

    They are definitely unpaid. When we enter hours into payroll any shift over 6 hours shows as half an hour less than what is entered (also for 9+ hours an hour is removed)

    As it is a small restaurant, there is only one manager on duty at any time, and therefore whilst I do get time for food, im required to be available at any point during my shift and am therefore frequently interrupted during my food.

    To me, this does not constitute a break as I'm required to eat very fast and am often needed during my 'break' to deal with customers, kitchen issues and helping out staff.

    hope this clears stuff up
    thanks again folks :)
    Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris
    (If Caesar were alive, you'd be chained to an oar)
    :starmod: :staradmin :starmod:
    "It's good to be back"
  • dori2o
    dori2o Posts: 8,150 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    M-People wrote: »
    Hey guys, thanks for the replies; in response to being forced to take these breaks;

    They are definitely unpaid. When we enter hours into payroll any shift over 6 hours shows as half an hour less than what is entered (also for 9+ hours an hour is removed)

    As it is a small restaurant, there is only one manager on duty at any time, and therefore whilst I do get time for food, im required to be available at any point during my shift and am therefore frequently interrupted during my food.

    To me, this does not constitute a break as I'm required to eat very fast and am often needed during my 'break' to deal with customers, kitchen issues and helping out staff.

    hope this clears stuff up
    thanks again folks :)
    It's not a break.

    If you are interrupted and forced back to work before your contractual break time is up then it is not a break.

    A bbreak MUST be an uninterrupted period of time.

    The law says you MUST be allowed to take a 20 minute uninterrupted break if you work 6 hours or more.

    See the guidance here https://www.gov.uk/rest-breaks-work
    [SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
    [/SIZE]
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    edited 8 October 2014 at 4:54PM
    dori2o wrote: »
    It's not a break.

    If you are interrupted and forced back to work before your contractual break time is up then it is not a break.

    A bbreak MUST be an uninterrupted period of time.

    The law says you MUST be allowed to take a 20 minute uninterrupted break if you work 6 hours or more.

    See the guidance here https://www.gov.uk/rest-breaks-work

    only for MORE than 6hours.

    seems the solution may be to do 5.59 shift if the system automatically does 30mins for 6hr.
  • I think the key point that is missing here is that you are owed the breaks - not the money. You are at liberty to insist on your contractual breaks. You have no legal right to claim money for not taking them. So what you want - the money - is never going to happen. You can certainly insist on the breaks. For as long as you have a job... Because even if you get past the magic two years, you won't be sacked for taking breaks. It will be for something else.


    Sorry, but if you want better and fairer terms, you need a better job...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.