📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Marshall Hoares/Northern Debt Recovery - FOS on unfair charges & breach of OFT rules

Options
fermi
fermi Posts: 40,542 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker Rampant Recycler
edited 14 September 2013 at 1:08PM in Debt-free wannabe
FOS decision that may be useful to some: http://www.ombudsman-decisions.org.uk/viewPDF.aspx?FileID=12684
complaint

Ms D complains that Marshall Hoares Bailiffs Limited (MHBL) added unfair charges to her account
and harassed her in pursuit of a debt.

our initial conclusions

Our adjudicator recommended that the complaint be upheld. She found that MHBL added charges
to this account after Ms D told it of her financial difficulties; she did not consider this to be
reasonable. Our adjudicator also found that MHBL’s communications with Ms D did not meet Office
of Fair Trading (OFT) requirements. She recommended that it reduce Ms D’s outstanding debt to
£359 and pay Ms D £200 to reflect the distress and inconvenience this matter has caused her.

my final decision

I have considered all the available evidence and arguments to decide what is fair and reasonable
in the circumstances of this complaint. Having done so, I uphold this complaint.
Ms D was lent £200 by a company affiliated to MHBL in April 2012. Ms D suffered financial
difficulties and was unable to repay the debt as planned, incurring late payment charges. She
informed the lender of her situation in June 2012 and tried to negotiate an affordable repayment
plan. Her lender rejected this and referred the debt to MHBL, adding further charges to the
account. Both companies sent aggressive emails and texts to Ms D demanding repayment.

I find that MHBL added unreasonable charges to Ms D’s account after she said she was in financial
difficulties. I am also satisfied that MHBL’s communications did not meet the requirements of the
OFT’s debt collection guidance by “putting undue pressure” on Ms D. It follows that MHBL should
compensate Ms D for this.

My final decision is that I uphold this complaint and I order Marshall Hoares Bailiffs Limited to pay
redress as set out in full overleaf.

ombudsman notes


My final decision is that I uphold this complaint and order Marshall Hoares Bailiffs Limited to:

 reduce Ms D’s outstanding debt to £359;
 agree an appropriate and affordable repayment plan with Ms D for this debt; and
 pay Ms D £200 for the distress and inconvenience this matter has caused her.
Free/impartial debt advice: National Debtline | StepChange Debt Charity | Find your local CAB

IVA & fee charging DMP companies: Profits from misery, motivated ONLY by greed
«1

Comments

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.