We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Costs soar as Labour voters told to pay their way
ruggedtoast
Posts: 9,819 Forumite
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jun/08/councils-benefit-cuts-families-homes

A Guardian reader, apparently dissatisfied with her free handout
It's a shame that this is costing money in the short term, but hopefully people will start getting the message that they can't just turn up in the middle of central London with their pockets turned out and a couple of kids in tow and expect a taxpayer funded flat 5 minutes walk from Buckingham palace because, because it's their rights innit.
I found the comments infuriating, I can't understand how anyone who actually works and pays taxes can approve virtually unlimited amounts of public money being handed over to private landlords so that people on benefits can live places people who work ad live within their means can't afford.
The government's clampdown on benefits is forcing up, rather than cutting, the cost of housing low-income families in wealthy areas, as people are shifted into hotels and bed and breakfasts, according to new figures obtained for the Observer.
Charities are also reporting a chain of misery and chaos as children are forced to move schools, and parents have to spend much of their time ferrying them large distances to classes.
Data obtained through freedom of information requests shows that at Westminster council – one of the wealthiest areas in the country – the bill for homelessness has shot up by 63.5% since last year as new temporary accommodation has had to be found for those hit by cuts. The figures show that it has cost Westminster more to place thousands of people in temporary accommodation, including hotels, than the council has saved through the government's welfare clampdown.

A Guardian reader, apparently dissatisfied with her free handout
It's a shame that this is costing money in the short term, but hopefully people will start getting the message that they can't just turn up in the middle of central London with their pockets turned out and a couple of kids in tow and expect a taxpayer funded flat 5 minutes walk from Buckingham palace because, because it's their rights innit.
I found the comments infuriating, I can't understand how anyone who actually works and pays taxes can approve virtually unlimited amounts of public money being handed over to private landlords so that people on benefits can live places people who work ad live within their means can't afford.
0
Comments
-
I'd thank you twice if I could Rugged.“I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.” - P.G. Wodehouse0
-
The costs for housing these "homeless" folk is staggering! £12k+ a month in some cases according to the BBC article.Thinking critically since 1996....0
-
somethingcorporate wrote: »The costs for housing these "homeless" folk is staggering! £12k+ a month in some cases according to the BBC article.
!!!!!! - BUILD COUNCIL HOUSES!!!
...it's a no-brainer...
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
I wonder how many children in the UK are required to change schools as their parents change jobs, etc. For myself, I went to 3 primary schools and one secondary one.
As opposed to "misery", I quite enjoyed it. My ex-boss's children have now been to schools in 3 different countries and two different areas of the UK.
I don't think it's misery-inducing, and, in fact, I think it builds strength and flexibility.0 -
Jennifer_Jane wrote: »I wonder how many children in the UK are required to change schools as their parents change jobs, etc. For myself, I went to 3 primary schools and one secondary one.
As opposed to "misery", I quite enjoyed it. My ex-boss's children have now been to schools in 3 different countries and two different areas of the UK.
I don't think it's misery-inducing, and, in fact, I think it builds strength and flexibility.
Have you ever met anybody from the 'lower classes'?
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »I've met many who have risen to great heights. Aspiration has no class or boundaries.
My question was not addressed to you...
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
Have you ever met anybody from the 'lower classes'?
TruckerT
Defining people by class is a miserable thing, Trucker. What a pity you work to this narrow, stupid, outdated standard.
Obviously your question is also ridiculous. If you don't think I've lived my life going to school with, working with, socialising with, and falling in love with, people of all types and backgrounds, then you must think I've lived a very insular life.
I guess you want me to be offended, but really, your post is just beyond belief.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards