We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Why doesn't Cameron want Scottish Independence?
Comments
-
The new bridge is already being built.
Looks a bargain :beer:
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/transport/construction-begins-on-new-forth-bridge.
£1,500,000,000 projected cost. It'll be interesting to see what it comes in at.
Don't get me wrong, infrastructure can be good, indeed it can be great. Whether the Scottish economy will get £1,500,000,000 plus the deadweight cost of the tax plus interest back in extra GDP is very much open to question.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »i suppose if you start planning a motorway from edinburgh to aberdeeen now, it should be built just about in time for when north sea oil runs out. is the business case for the motorway therefore that it will be required to transport the population of post-oil aberdeen to other areas of scotland?
I think it'll be needed to take oil to Aberdeen in future, or more likely LPG.0 -
Indeed.
There's definitely money in Scotland to be spent on transport: Edinburgh council is in the process of spending the best part of a billion quid (which equals a fair amount of intercity motorway) on half of a viable tram line.
Mind you, that's probably the fault of Westminster as well.
Remember: Edinburgh was formerly* Tory so it's all their fault.
*going back to 1999 they've been no higher than third. Were 2nd in 1995.0 -
Indeed.
There's definitely money in Scotland to be spent on transport: Edinburgh council is in the process of spending the best part of a billion quid (which equals a fair amount of intercity motorway) on half of a viable tram line.
Mind you, that's probably the fault of Westminster as well.
The M90 was contructed between '64-'78 so mix of labour and tory governments in westminster.There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0 -
£1,500,000,000 projected cost. It'll be interesting to see what it comes in at.
Don't get me wrong, infrastructure can be good, indeed it can be great. Whether the Scottish economy will get £1,500,000,000 plus the deadweight cost of the tax plus interest back in extra GDP is very much open to question.
It's obviously not just down to what the economy will benefit and in a modern high tax country, you would hope they put infrastructure before "bling"
St Pancras station refurb was £800m.
I'm sure the people who use it think it's worth it just as the people who user the forth road bridge.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »i suppose if you start planning a motorway from edinburgh to aberdeeen now, it should be built just about in time for when north sea oil runs out. is the business case for the motorway therefore that it will be required to transport the population of post-oil aberdeen to other areas of scotland?
Care to share when that will be and why?
If you do try and answer, I bet it's different from what I hear from guys (Aberdeen based) who work onshore, offshore and with exploration rigs worldwide within the oil industry.
I think the problems of late have been Westminster tax and mechanical issues which made areas unsafe for a while.
The M74 is a good road and is 3 lanes for most of the way between (M6) Carlisle and Glasgow but they do need better main roads on the East side of the UK (A1) and the M8 between Glasgow and Edinburgh should also be fully 3 lanes.0 -
By comparing this graph:
To this graph
I reckon we've got about 5.5 years left.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »
I reckon we've got about 5.5 years left.
I bet your miles wrong.
In 5.5 years we could easy be producing more than we are today.0 -
I bet your miles wrong.
In 5.5 years we could easy be producing more than we are today.
perhaps, but as my graphs and detailed analysis show, that will obviously just be the "return to normal" phase to be quickly followed by fear, capitulation and despair before the oil actually runs out in 2020.0 -
Personally I think it will be viable for another 30 years on what we know so far.
The graph doesn't really tell us how much oil is there.
The current (low) extraction is around $110,000,000 worth per day, every day.
Not a bad resource for a 5m population country.
No wonder Cameron is doing all he can to keep Scotland in.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards