We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
2 products - can't decide!
murphydog999
Posts: 1,604 Forumite
We are favouring 2 mortgage products from our lender and it's pretty much down to fixed rate or tracker. Any wise advice out there?
2yr fixed 3.09% fee £995 4.0% overall APR. Payment £958 (example shows fee included in payments)
2yr tracker 2.99% fee £995 3.9% overall APR. Payment £944 (example shows fee paid up front)
They are so evenly matched, does it just boil down to whether we think the base rate will rise within 2 years?
Is the fee best paid up front?
T.I.A.
2yr fixed 3.09% fee £995 4.0% overall APR. Payment £958 (example shows fee included in payments)
2yr tracker 2.99% fee £995 3.9% overall APR. Payment £944 (example shows fee paid up front)
They are so evenly matched, does it just boil down to whether we think the base rate will rise within 2 years?
Is the fee best paid up front?
T.I.A.
0
Comments
-
THe fees are the same so you can ignorethem in proper comparisons.
It makes no difference paying up front or adding to the loan you either have the money or you don't so borrow the appropriate amount.
adding fees usualy means you don't pay if the deals falls through.
Whats the followon rates if the same you can ignore that.
APR is useless for comparing.
you don't give enough details to do the proper comparison
You are trading 0.1% for rates not going up in 2 years do you feel luky.
on £200k over 25years paying £958pm you have after 2 years
3.09% £189,047.13
2.99% £188,646.03
So about £400 extra for security of the fix
what is the mortgage and term?0 -
Thanks. 17 years £151K0
-
Any more thoughts anyone?0
-
Other peoples thoughts are irrelevant. It is a straight choice between taking a gamble on rates staying low or insuring against a rise for the same period.
Which is you? Risky or safe?I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
Rates aren't going lower so whilst it will probably make little difference why not get the security of the fixed rate at little or no cost0
-
murphydog999 wrote: »Thanks. 17 years £151K
on £151k over 17 years paying £958pm you have after 2 years
3.09% £136,927.54
2.99% £136,630.32
£300(ish) to fix.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards