We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Critique my economy fix.
spadoosh
Posts: 8,732 Forumite
Please bear with me on this one but im struggling to find many flaws with it, im sure it will be shot down straight away but i cant see many problems with it apart from implementing it.
Essentially instead of having a tax based system move towards a contribution based system.
A minimum contribution (tax) will be imposed from which everyone can expect basic human rights, then a voluntary contribution in which you can top-up a 'social fund' which entitles you to take more out of the system in terms of financial breaks, better welfare etc. So essentially you could choose were your taxes go, for example for people worried about their employment they could over contribute and upon no work they could top up their income from their overpayments.
This would do away with most benefits, anyone who can not afford/doesnt pay contributions will be housed/fed/watered by the government at a very basic level (enough to meet human needs and rights) so for them to recieve additional benefits they will have to contribute.
Jobs that are beneficial to the economy and to society will also carry 'reliefs or benefits' with them so for example a low paid care worker would have a lower contribution to pay than a celeb lets say for example. Go on a what the economy needs basis more than a wants.
The really controversial one! Would also suggest doing away with laws and having one overruling law that is protecting human rights anything that is deemed to infringe human rights would carry a punishment. Instead of having laws that protect government ideals and old fashioned ideologys.
I would hope that this would lead people to help others and contribute to a better society instead of the dog eat dog we seem to have at the moment that seems to cause soo many problems.
Im unfortunately one of those who believe we can't carry on as we have done with the wealth divide increasing, it literally is tearing society apart at the seams.
This is my response to those who say im not really a fan of capitalism but you aint got a better idea. Well here it is what i think would be a better idea.
Please tear it apart, i know its basic i am by no means a genius. And am expecting to be told as much, truth be told! Please no personal slurs its just an idea, might be stupid but i would like to contribute to a better place to live. Obviously there is a massive range of views and beliefs so lets hear them!
Essentially instead of having a tax based system move towards a contribution based system.
A minimum contribution (tax) will be imposed from which everyone can expect basic human rights, then a voluntary contribution in which you can top-up a 'social fund' which entitles you to take more out of the system in terms of financial breaks, better welfare etc. So essentially you could choose were your taxes go, for example for people worried about their employment they could over contribute and upon no work they could top up their income from their overpayments.
This would do away with most benefits, anyone who can not afford/doesnt pay contributions will be housed/fed/watered by the government at a very basic level (enough to meet human needs and rights) so for them to recieve additional benefits they will have to contribute.
Jobs that are beneficial to the economy and to society will also carry 'reliefs or benefits' with them so for example a low paid care worker would have a lower contribution to pay than a celeb lets say for example. Go on a what the economy needs basis more than a wants.
The really controversial one! Would also suggest doing away with laws and having one overruling law that is protecting human rights anything that is deemed to infringe human rights would carry a punishment. Instead of having laws that protect government ideals and old fashioned ideologys.
I would hope that this would lead people to help others and contribute to a better society instead of the dog eat dog we seem to have at the moment that seems to cause soo many problems.
Im unfortunately one of those who believe we can't carry on as we have done with the wealth divide increasing, it literally is tearing society apart at the seams.
This is my response to those who say im not really a fan of capitalism but you aint got a better idea. Well here it is what i think would be a better idea.
Please tear it apart, i know its basic i am by no means a genius. And am expecting to be told as much, truth be told! Please no personal slurs its just an idea, might be stupid but i would like to contribute to a better place to live. Obviously there is a massive range of views and beliefs so lets hear them!
0
Comments
-
And we could all gather on the village green and sing Kumbaya0
-
And we could all gather on the village green and sing Kumbaya
Lol, yeah something along those lines.
Or maybe just simply not go out of our way to hinder others. And help and support each other.
There is a massive 'them and us' in this country and across the world, do we not all want the simple things in life?! Or is status and material possesions our aim as humanity?!0 -
Legalise & tax drugs, shrink the state by a third or so, abolish employers NI & then corporation tax on a sliding scale depending on %age of full time employees based in the UK, stop having silly wars, cut benefits.
Pots of money, full employment & a finger in the eye for the eurocrats.
Easy job.0 -
heathcote123 wrote: »Legalise & tax drugs, shrink the state by a third or so, abolish employers NI & then corporation tax on a sliding scale depending on %age of full time employees based in the UK, stop having silly wars, cut benefits.
Pots of money, full employment & a finger in the eye for the eurocrats.
Easy job.
Kinda missed my point about helping everyone not just ourselves but nay mind.
And wars generate money, they increase employment, manufacturing etc. And the ones weve been in recently look like there trying to increase resources aswell.
Not pro war btw but with present governments i could see why they would want to.
Would be interesting to know how much recent wars have cost and how much the economy has gained subsequently. probably the first war in history to make a terrific loss not just on the frontline.0 -
If you look at who holds the majority of oil contracts now in Iraq, You will find the Chinese have done the best out of the mess that was created. Sun Tzu- win all without fighting.
I believe this applies strategically as well, IE, the chinese have chosen to fight the americans on the econmic battleground, rather than the real one, where they know they have no hope of winning.0 -
And we could all gather on the village green and sing Kumbaya
Not a surprising answer there from someone who is more Thatcherite than the [STRIKE]great[/STRIKE] not so great Lady herself.0 -
Kinda missed my point about helping everyone not just ourselves but nay mind.
And wars generate money, they increase employment, manufacturing etc. And the ones weve been in recently look like there trying to increase resources aswell.
Not pro war btw but with present governments i could see why they would want to.
Would be interesting to know how much recent wars have cost and how much the economy has gained subsequently. probably the first war in history to make a terrific loss not just on the frontline.
While I appreciate war causes lots of spending of money, I'm not entirely convinced that the spoils of it outweigh the costs. It's a bit of a Brownism, assuming !!!!ing cash up the wall must result in a return. We just have to be a bit too subtle with our wars nowadays & not completely loot the place & spend years 'policing' it etc.
However, never let it be said I am a party pooper, so I'll go for war on France - not much in travel costs, should be an easy scrap & plenty to loot.
Cutting peoples tax & state dependency is the kindest thing you can do to them - it just might take a them a few years to see it.0 -
heathcote123 wrote: »While I appreciate war causes lots of spending of money, I'm not entirely convinced that the spoils of it outweigh the costs. It's a bit of a Brownism, assuming !!!!ing cash up the wall must result in a return. We just have to be a bit too subtle with our wars nowadays & not completely loot the place & spend years 'policing' it etc.
However, never let it be said I am a party pooper, so I'll go for war on France - not much in travel costs, should be an easy scrap & plenty to loot.
Cutting peoples tax & state dependency is the kindest thing you can do to them - it just might take a them a few years to see it.
U been to france recently?! They only just getting over the second world war and introducing decent public toilets. Not much to loot at all!!
With wars and money was reffering more to historic wars that always led to a boom (on the winning side) shortly after.
"Cutting peoples tax & state dependency is the kindest thing you can do to them - it just might take a them a few years to see it" sounds like a thatcherism that people are still trying to see from her era.
Think we might be on opposite sides of the table on politics, like post #2 says i wanna sing by a campfire
from wannabe hippy
Ahhh no your a liberal?! your in the middle, not too far away then?!? i got that from 'cutting peoples taxes'0 -
Nice idea, where it all falls apart is that some people are lazy and some are workers.0
-
Or everyone gets basic minimum income, this does not affect anything you earn, a bit like child benefit. Wonder how many people would go back to work?MSE Forum's favourite nutter :T0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards