We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Now its all the fault of the credit ratings agencies
MacMickster
Posts: 3,648 Forumite
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15739234
So it seems that the EU now thinks that the agencies shouldn't give negative opinions to investors to help them judge the risk of investing in government bonds, as that makes investors less likely to want to invest in those bonds, hence driving up interest rates.
Perhaps those who post on other boards who are struggling to get a mortgage with a poor credit rating could use this same argument to persuade Experian etc to only report nice things about them.
EU targets credit rating agencies
The European Commission has put forward stricter rules for the credit rating agencies that rank countries' and companies' debt.
It says the agencies, including Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch, should follow stricter rules, be more transparent about their ratings and be held accountable for their mistakes.
Agencies' reports help investors to judge borrowers' creditworthiness.
Downgrades from them can provoke higher interest rates for weaker borrowers.
The EC internal market commissioner, Michel Barnier, said the agencies, which are privately owned by investors, had a serious and widespread effect on individuals.
"Ratings have a direct impact on the markets and the wider economy and thus on the prosperity of European citizens," he said. "They are not just simple opinions."
So it seems that the EU now thinks that the agencies shouldn't give negative opinions to investors to help them judge the risk of investing in government bonds, as that makes investors less likely to want to invest in those bonds, hence driving up interest rates.
Perhaps those who post on other boards who are struggling to get a mortgage with a poor credit rating could use this same argument to persuade Experian etc to only report nice things about them.
"When the people fear the government there is tyranny, when the government fears the people there is liberty." - Thomas Jefferson
0
Comments
-
He also said they were not infallible in their assessments and had made "serious mistakes" in the past.
Yer....like not downgrading them.
Everything you read comes across as either sheer desperation or a real desire to become a dictatorship.0 -
Indeed. By all means criticise them for not downgrading early enough or harshly enough, or simply being wrong for a long time, but this is insanity. Besides, some guy at work was telling me that sovereign ratings react to the market more than the other way around, and he used to be a bond trader.0
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »Yer....like not downgrading them.
.
Or be a bit more careful
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15686580Standard & Poor's accidentally released a message to some of its subscribers on Thursday saying that it had downgraded French debt from its top AAA rating.
S&P said it was investigating what had gone wrong and stressed that France still had an AAA rating.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
the EU does not like democracy or freedom.
it is possibly the most dangerous institution ever.
look how it has removed the heads of Greece and Italy and replaced them with unelected pro-europe puppets. look how they forbade Ireland to have a general election.
now they are dictating to the credit ratings agencies. soon, there will be an EU only ratings agency giving every county triple A status.
can you ever see it stopping. the answer is NEVER. it will grind on regardless of everything until we have a vast federal europe headed by germany. we will end up a part of it as it will be too costly to remain outside. that or become the 51st state (much more preferable).
they are thieves, liers and the most dangerous people on earth.0 -
Indeed. By all means criticise them for not downgrading early enough or harshly enough, or simply being wrong for a long time, but this is insanity. Besides, some guy at work was telling me that sovereign ratings react to the market more than the other way around, and he used to be a bond trader.
Yes, they are lagging not leading indicators, always. French debt has been trading at below AAA levels for many months now.
It's funny how they criticised them for rating sub-prime CDO's AAA wrongly and now they're criticising them for downgrading euro sovereign credits rightly. It also displays their total lack of understanding of how the market works, thinking the rating is causing their problems or making them worse. No, the rating is simply the confirmation of the verdict the market delivered a long time ago.
Not that that will stop them from establishing their own as WH said as the only one that counts, and when they do, it won't make a blind bit of difference to investors' perception of their crap paper.0 -
To be fair they have been central to this mess we're in. First off they totally underestimated risk during the boom which contributed to the lending spree. Now they're playing games by making announcements regarding downgrades at the worst possible time in order to cause maximum chaos within the markets. They even decided to down grade a country (France) "by mistake" (as if).
There's no doubt in my mind they need a very heavy dose of regulation.0 -
Clearly there is a lot of misunderstanding of what the credit rating agencies are and what they do.
Most, probably wouldn't have heard of them 3 years ago, and now they want to blame them for everything :eek:'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
thescouselander wrote: »To be fair they have been central to this mess we're in. First off they totally underestimated risk during the boom which contributed to the lending spree. Now they're playing games by making announcements regarding downgrades at the worst possible time in order to cause maximum chaos within the markets. They even decided to down grade a country (France) "by mistake" (as if).
There's no doubt in my mind they need a very heavy dose of regulation.
Yes they do require regulation but you don't replace crap with more crap.
I don't believe they're 'playing games' , it's obvious they're going to have to downgrade France when it's spread over Bunds has exploded to +150bp. That release was preprepared and some numpty accidentally sent it out early. They got much abuse for that so why would they do that deliberately, they're not exactly trading on it. It's damaged their reputation no end and that plays right into the EU's hands.
0 -
I blame the [STRIKE]Jews[/STRIKE]/[STRIKE]bankers[/STRIKE]/[STRIKE]ratings agencies[/STRIKE]/[STRIKE]defaulters[/STRIKE] scapegoats.0
-
Yes they do require regulation but you don't replace crap with more crap.
I don't believe they're 'playing games' , it's obvious they're going to have to downgrade France when it's spread over Bunds has exploded to +150bp. That release was preprepared and some numpty accidentally sent it out early. They got much abuse for that so why would they do that deliberately, they're not exactly trading on it. It's damaged their reputation no end and that plays right into the EU's hands.
I guess that's one explanation. The other explanation might be that they were up to a bit of market manipulation which isn't good for anyone and is also illegal.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards