We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Dave's lying again...
Comments
-
lemonjelly wrote: »“What I would say to Gordon Brown is if you call an election on November 1 we'll stop the closure of services at this hospital on November 2. “What we've heard today from the Government is more plans for cuts and closures in our NHS. They cannot be trusted with our health service.”
David Cameron, Chase Farm Hospital, October 2007.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8756245/Government-to-merge-Chase-Farm-Hospital-which-David-Cameron-vowed-to-save.html
Just remember, we're all in this together. Oh, & you can trust dave...
You do yourself a dis-service by posting such !!!!!!!!.0 -
It is a tricky one:
I can see the argument for concentrating resources in centres of excellence
However I can also see that models that conclude this is cost effective probably exclude a lot of non-NHS costs (such as travelling time and expenses for patients and relatives) and non-financial benefits (having a local hospital is more reassuring) that occur in the real world.
As Thrugelmir says though, it is a luxury that we can no longer afford
If we want a team of people who are more generalist to care for us when specialist services would have a better outcome then local for everything is fine.
If however we want to increase the chance of having a good outcome when we have a serious illness then having a team of specialists who see sufficient of the condition and it's variants to really know what they are doing then centres of excellence are the way to go.
The bit that's tricky is that we all probably want centres of excellence on our doorsteps and by their nature they are not the province of a cottage hospital.0 -
You do yourself a dis-service by posting such !!!!!!!!.
I agree, that Telegraph is a Tory comic
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
If we want a team of people who are more generalist to care for us when specialist services would have a better outcome then local for everything is fine.
If however we want to increase the chance of having a good outcome when we have a serious illness then having a team of specialists who see sufficient of the condition and it's variants to really know what they are doing then centres of excellence are the way to go.
The bit that's tricky is that we all probably want centres of excellence on our doorsteps and by their nature they are not the province of a cottage hospital.
But would an NHS 'centre of excellence' be as good as another culture's 'cottage hospital' - I need to be convinced...
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
.....If however we want to increase the chance of having a good outcome when we have a serious illness then having a team of specialists who see sufficient of the condition and it's variants to really know what they are doing then centres of excellence are the way to go.....
Specialists are not the issue. They are highly paid and take 15 minutes [probably £30] to 'consult' after the tests and declare an operation necessary.
It's the £3,000 spent on bureacracy, waiting list management, case reviews, budget considerations that worry me.0 -
Loughton_Monkey wrote: »Specialists are not the issue. They are highly paid and take 15 minutes [probably £30] to 'consult' after the tests and declare an operation necessary.
It's the £3,000 spent on bureacracy, waiting list management, case reviews, budget considerations that worry me.
I think we are conditioned to believe that because the UK NHS was the first, it will always be the best - the politicians say it louder and louder, but it becomes less and less true
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
But would an NHS 'centre of excellence' be as good as another culture's 'cottage hospital' - I need to be convinced....
Oh don't be silly. Where is this other culture whose "cottage hospital" has a fraction of the expertise available in even a mediocre NHS District General Hospital? Ah, thought so -- it's a fantasy in your head.0 -
Dave's lying again...
How could you tell? Were his lips moving?“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Not sure of the specifics at this hospital, but Private Eye have long been arguing for certain services, specifically children's heart procedures, to be concentrated into a smaller number of units. This is based on clinical evidence that results improve when they are organised like this. Of course, this is extremely hard to sell to the public, because all people hear is "this unit/hospital is being closed."They are an EYESORES!!!!0
-
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jan/07/politicians-lie-david-cameron-mendacity-expensesOriginally posted by David Cameron
any cabinet minister … who comes to me and says 'Here are my plans' and they involve frontline reductions, they'll be sent straight back to their department to go away and think again". Yet £81bn in cuts now rain down on frontline services.It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
