Reclaiming VAT on clothes for children

Options
Are children’s clothes still exempt from VAT?
If so, then surely I can reclaim VAT from clothes bought for my 14yo son, yes?
He’s into size 7 shoes now, and they’re getting real expensive!

Thanks
Guy
«1

Comments

  • unforeseen
    unforeseen Posts: 7,283 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    Nope you can't reclaim. The VAT exemption is for clothes that are made for children Not adult clothes that fit children.
  • TheCyclingProgrammer
    Options
    If they were exempt from VAT then you wouldn’t have paid any VAT in the first place.
  • unforeseen
    unforeseen Posts: 7,283 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    Size 7 shoes are not exempt because they are an adult size. OP wanted to claim the VAT back on them.
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    Combo Breaker First Post
    edited 11 November 2017 at 12:53PM
    Options
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/vat-notice-714-zero-rating-young-childrens-clothing-and-footwear/vat-notice-714-zero-rating-young-childrens-clothing-and-footwear

    "Children's" clothes are defined by size, not age of the wearer. If they meet the criteria then no VAT is charged on them (technically they are zero rated, not exempt). Since none has been charged, you cannot reclaim it.

    size 7 shoes are precisely 1/2 size too large to be categorised as a child size, so are subject to normal 20% VAT which you cannot reclaim.

    "4.3 Footwear
    HMRC will accept that footwear is designed for young people when the following measurements are met:

    Boys shoes: up to and including size 6½.

    Girls court shoes (that is a low cut shoe without straps or other fastenings): up to (and including) size 3.
    Other girls shoes: up to (and including) size 3; and sizes 3½ to 5½ as long as the heel height doesn’t exceed the sole depth by more than 4cms (approx 1⅔ inches)."
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 44,422 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    4.3 Footwear
    HMRC will accept that footwear is designed for young people when the following measurements are met:

    Boys shoes: up to and including size 6½.

    Girls court shoes (that is a low cut shoe without straps or other fastenings): up to (and including) size 3.
    Other girls shoes: up to (and including) size 3; and sizes 3½ to 5½
    as long as the heel height doesn’t exceed the sole depth by more than 4cms (approx 1⅔ inches)."


    Gender discrimination.......:eek:

    Bring on the court case and the compo!:D
  • TheCyclingProgrammer
    Options
    unforeseen wrote: »
    Size 7 shoes are not exempt because they are an adult size. OP wanted to claim the VAT back on them.

    I understood that, it just didn’t seem like OP understood how VAT works. Like I said, if they had been exempt or zero rated (I accept they aren’t in this case) there wouldn’t have been any VAT charged in the first place so nothing to reclaim (not that individuals can reclaim VAT on their purchases anyway).
  • bluphoto7
    bluphoto7 Posts: 82 Forumite
    edited 11 November 2017 at 6:30PM
    Options
    Struggling to get my head around the difference between designed for children and “designed for small people”.
    For me, the first definition should go by age, and the second feels discriminatory.

    Is the HMRC definition of a child “a person with feet smaller than size 7”?

    Just paid £40 for my boys boots, where the identical size 6 was £29.99. (So adult is 33% more)
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    Combo Breaker First Post
    edited 11 November 2017 at 6:38PM
    Options
    xylophone wrote: »
    Gender discrimination.......:eek:

    Bring on the court case and the compo!:D
    indeed, after all we should be buying gender neutral clothes and shoes as we are all entering the world of androgyny. Instead HMRC persists in crude displays of skirtism :eek:

    "Boys
    Garment Chest Waist
    Shirts 104cms 41.0’’
    Knitwear 104cms 41.0’’
    Jackets, waistcoats 109cms 43.0’’
    Top coats, outerwear 114cms 44.5’’
    Dresses N/A N/A
    Skirts* N/A N/A

    Trousers, shorts* 72cms 28.5’’
    Underwear, swimwear 88cms 34.5’’ 72cms 28.5’’
    Nightwear 105cms 41.5’’ 73cms 29.0’’

    (*Those garments with elasticated waistbands should be measured at their full stretch. Those that have no fastening may be zero rated up to a maximum stretched waist of 85 cms (33½”) for boys and 90cms (35½”) for girls.)"


    https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/jun/22/teenage-boys-wear-skirts-to-school-protest-no-shorts-uniform-policy
  • dori2o
    dori2o Posts: 8,150 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    00ec25 wrote: »
    indeed, after all we should be buying gender neutral clothes and shoes as we are all entering the world of androgyny. Instead HMRC persists in crude displays of skirtism :eek:

    "Boys
    Garment Chest Waist
    Shirts 104cms 41.0’’
    Knitwear 104cms 41.0’’
    Jackets, waistcoats 109cms 43.0’’
    Top coats, outerwear 114cms 44.5’’
    Dresses N/A N/A
    Skirts* N/A N/A

    Trousers, shorts* 72cms 28.5’’
    Underwear, swimwear 88cms 34.5’’ 72cms 28.5’’
    Nightwear 105cms 41.5’’ 73cms 29.0’’

    (*Those garments with elasticated waistbands should be measured at their full stretch. Those that have no fastening may be zero rated up to a maximum stretched waist of 85 cms (33½”) for boys and 90cms (35½”) for girls.)"


    https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/jun/22/teenage-boys-wear-skirts-to-school-protest-no-shorts-uniform-policy

    HMRC do no such thing, they simply enforce the legislation passed and written by HMTreasury (office of the Chancellor of the Exchequer)..
    [SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
    [/SIZE]
  • Pennywise
    Pennywise Posts: 13,468 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post First Anniversary
    Options
    dori2o wrote: »
    HMRC do no such thing, they simply enforce the legislation passed and written by HMTreasury (office of the Chancellor of the Exchequer)..

    As you well know, legislation wording can't possibly cover every detail, so HMRC do make their own interpretations, and have often lost challenged in tribunals and courts, when the tribunal has disagreed with HMRCs operation of particular bits of legislation.

    Eg the written legislation doesn't lay out the sizes etc as copied/pasted by 00ec25.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards