Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@. Skimlinks & other affiliated links are turned on

Search
  • FIRST POST
    • Former MSE Helen
    • By Former MSE Helen 22nd Feb 13, 2:11 PM
    • 2,324Posts
    • 971Thanks
    Former MSE Helen
    MSE News: Dodgy credit firms face OFT crackdown
    • #1
    • 22nd Feb 13, 2:11 PM
    MSE News: Dodgy credit firms face OFT crackdown 22nd Feb 13 at 2:11 PM
    "Unscrupulous credit firms can now have their licenses taken away immediately, under new OFT powers..."

    Read the full story:

    Dodgy credit firms face OFT crackdown



    Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.

Page 1
    • JohnRo
    • By JohnRo 22nd Feb 13, 3:53 PM
    • 1,715 Posts
    • 1,381 Thanks
    JohnRo
    • #2
    • 22nd Feb 13, 3:53 PM
    • #2
    • 22nd Feb 13, 3:53 PM
    It all smacks of yet more authoritarian power and control for the sake of it, creeping nanny state etc. and all in the name of protecting people from their own stupidity. If these firms are using violence, fraud or trading dishonestly, they're breaking the law and that should be more than sufficient cause for the police to act immediately without adding to the endless rules, regulations, power and control over everyone's lives being handed to damned bureaucrats.
    'We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.' ― Albert Einstein
    'Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.' ― Aldous Huxley
  • analyst
    • #3
    • 22nd Feb 13, 4:18 PM
    • #3
    • 22nd Feb 13, 4:18 PM
    JohnRo, are you an avid reader of the Daily Heil by any chance?
    The bankers stole my pension (and everyone else's). It should have earned a lot of money, but they took their bonus pot first.
    • JohnRo
    • By JohnRo 22nd Feb 13, 4:57 PM
    • 1,715 Posts
    • 1,381 Thanks
    JohnRo
    • #4
    • 22nd Feb 13, 4:57 PM
    • #4
    • 22nd Feb 13, 4:57 PM
    Far from it and can't quite see the connection. I'll retort by asking if your defensive posture means you're an unaccountable civil servant by any chance?
    'We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.' ― Albert Einstein
    'Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.' ― Aldous Huxley
    • poppasmurf_bewdley
    • By poppasmurf_bewdley 22nd Feb 13, 5:23 PM
    • 4,505 Posts
    • 4,593 Thanks
    poppasmurf_bewdley
    • #5
    • 22nd Feb 13, 5:23 PM
    • #5
    • 22nd Feb 13, 5:23 PM
    There has been far too much use made of the appeals system in this country - whether it be shady loan companies or asylum seekers - as a way of dragging out the inevitable and enabling individuals and companies to continue doing what they've been doing, and anything which stops such practices is to be applauded.
    SIR WINSTON S. CHURCHILL: WE HAVE OUR OWN DREAM AND OUR OWN TASK. WE ARE WITH EUROPE, BUT NOT OF IT. WE ARE LINKED BUT NOT COMBINED. WE ARE INTERESTED AND ASSOCIATED BUT NOT ABSORBED. IF BRITAIN MUST CHOOSE BETWEEN EUROPE AND THE OPEN SEA, SHE MUST ALWAYS CHOOSE THE OPEN SEA.
    • mo786uk
    • By mo786uk 22nd Feb 13, 10:50 PM
    • 1,330 Posts
    • 565 Thanks
    mo786uk
    • #6
    • 22nd Feb 13, 10:50 PM
    • #6
    • 22nd Feb 13, 10:50 PM
    It all smacks of yet more authoritarian power and control for the sake of it, creeping nanny state etc. and all in the name of protecting people from their own stupidity. If these firms are using violence, fraud or trading dishonestly, they're breaking the law and that should be more than sufficient cause for the police to act immediately without adding to the endless rules, regulations, power and control over everyone's lives being handed to damned bureaucrats.
    Originally posted by JohnRo
    People like you are the reason why the powers are used sparingly rather than as often as they should be.

    A positive licencing system has many benefits as you can put many controls on anyone who wants a licence - for example the OFT debt collection guidance. Trying to deal with every breach by prosecution wouldn't be feasible. Threatening to close a business by removing their licence is more feasiable.
  • analyst
    • #7
    • 23rd Feb 13, 3:19 PM
    • #7
    • 23rd Feb 13, 3:19 PM
    • We didn't have effective regulatory control of the financial sector and look where that has got us.
    • We didn't have effective regulatory control of the press and look where that has got us.
    • We didn't have effective regulatory control of the police and look where that has got us.
    • We didn't have effective regulatory control of the gambling sector and look where that has got us.
    • We didn't have effective regulatory control of the food industries and look where that has got us.

    How long are we going to keep on putting our (horse's) head in the sand?

    FWIW JohnRo - No I am not a civil servant, nor ever have been. But it is interesting that you seem to make a sweeping dismissal of all public sector workers (I see the inference there) as unaccountable.

    I have worked in both public and private sectors almost equally throughout my life. I found the private sector to be, by far, the more corrupt, discriminatory, nepotistic, tax-avoiding, tax evading, profiteering, penny-pinching, corner-cutting, safety compromising, polluting, and yes, least accountable.

    We may call it the private sector, but ultimately it is all public money. Who do you think is actually paying for the obscene pensions and bonuses of the board of Sainsbury's, or Tesco or Sky, or GlaxoSmithKline or . . . (insert your 'favourite' company name here).
    The bankers stole my pension (and everyone else's). It should have earned a lot of money, but they took their bonus pot first.
    • JohnRo
    • By JohnRo 24th Feb 13, 12:53 PM
    • 1,715 Posts
    • 1,381 Thanks
    JohnRo
    • #8
    • 24th Feb 13, 12:53 PM
    • #8
    • 24th Feb 13, 12:53 PM
    Ok so we've established unaccountable bureaucrats are either complicit, corrupt, or incompetent. That's a given.

    Now, explain how giving them even more powers is going to help make the situation any better.
    'We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.' ― Albert Einstein
    'Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.' ― Aldous Huxley
  • analyst
    • #9
    • 24th Feb 13, 2:27 PM
    • #9
    • 24th Feb 13, 2:27 PM
    we've established unaccountable bureaucrats are either complicit, corrupt, or incompetent
    In your blinkered eyes only. As I said, I have extensively witnessed the other side of the coin and found it to be far, far worse.

    Now, explain how giving them even more powers is going to help make the situation any better.
    To take control of that vast mob of thieving, cheating, scamming, corrupt, discriminatory, nepotistic, tax-avoiding, tax evading, profiteering, penny-pinching, corner-cutting, safety compromising, polluting, unaccountable bar-stewards that skin us all and hive it off to their tax havens.

    Did I equivocate there?
    Last edited by analyst; 24-02-2013 at 2:30 PM.
    The bankers stole my pension (and everyone else's). It should have earned a lot of money, but they took their bonus pot first.
    • JohnRo
    • By JohnRo 24th Feb 13, 4:32 PM
    • 1,715 Posts
    • 1,381 Thanks
    JohnRo
    prevaricate is the word you're looking for.
    'We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.' ― Albert Einstein
    'Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.' ― Aldous Huxley
  • analyst
    nope, that was the word I'd ascribe to your post.
    I said equivocate and I meant it.
    The bankers stole my pension (and everyone else's). It should have earned a lot of money, but they took their bonus pot first.
    • cos
    • By cos 24th Feb 13, 11:43 PM
    • 611 Posts
    • 308 Thanks
    cos
    Based just on what MSE has published, this looks a bit like environmental health officers being able to close a restaurant, immediately, because it has rotten food or mouse droppings in the kitchen. I like this.

    The difference, of course, is the definition of unscrupulous, which itself is probably not a usable descriptor in financial legalese. I suspect some of the wrangling will come from the 'moral' aspect of lending practice.

    Many of us might agree that beating people up for non-payment is morally wrong, and would be happy to transcribe that to a legal status. I would.

    But, at what point does charging high interest become fraud, or illegal, or immoral?

    Personally, I think the government taking income tax, national insurance, fuel tax, property tax, sales tax, numerous other taxes from me over my working life is far more worthy of the attribution of 'theft' than these various doorstep lenders!


    ETA - I don't mean I like mouse droppings in the kitchen, despite my heritage
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim's to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

193Posts Today

1,238Users online

Martin's Twitter