We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Opinions pleeeese....

Hi everyone,
Some of you may remember a post I started about 1 week ago regarding the fact that I was assaulted whilst at work. My employers are progressing my complaint and going along with the official greivance procedure which I am pleased about, however I personally doubt anything will be done at the end of it as there were no witnesses to the incident. I am now going to explain the bit that I am hoping to get some opinions on:-
This guy that manhandled me, HAS done this before at work. A while back he assaulted someone and THERE WERE witnesses that stated what happened. The company decided to take no action. More recently there was an incident where he was alleged to have threatened someone else. Everyone knows that it happened because they saw it, but when company asked 'victim' about it, he denied it ever took place - I think because he was a bit worried he was gonna get a beating if he spoke of it.
DO YOU THINK IT RIGHT TO HOLD EMPLOYER PARTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FACT I HAVE NOW BEEN ASSAULTED BY THIS GUY? CONSIDERING THEY CHOSE TO TAKE NO ACTION WHEN HE DID IT BEFORE AND THERE WERE WITNESSES.... IS IT RIGHT TO EXPECT THE COMPANY TO COMPENSATE ME IN SOME WAY FOR THIS INCIDENT...

Opinions please, and if you disagree with me, please be honest..
Rgds doom:beer:
CARPE DIEM
aut viam inveniam aut faciam
Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour

Comments

  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    Please do not shout!

    Your employer has a duty of care towards you. If they had actual proof that this person has previously been violent, then they had a duty to act, and prevent this person from assaulting anyone else. However, as they took no further action on the previous occasion, I doubt that they found actual proof. Do you know the specific reason for them taking no further action?

    If the act against you was proven to be reasonably foreseeable, then you would have an action against your employer. However, this could become quite acromonious. Do you still wish to work for the employer?
    Gone ... or have I?
  • tallyhoh
    tallyhoh Posts: 2,318 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If someone assaulted me at work or otherwise I would make a complaint to the Police.

    Has this been done?
    Tallyhoh! Stopped Smoking October 2000. Saved £29382.50 so far!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.