We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
OFT warns debt sector about tracing tactics - Requirements imposed on Link Financial
Options

fermi
Posts: 40,542 Forumite



Link: OFT warns debt sector about tracing tactics
Requirements imposed on debt collection company
58/09 15 May 2009
The OFT is warning the debt collection and tracing sector that using neighbours to pass on messages to trace subjects is an unacceptable practice and should be ceased immediately.
It is concerned that some businesses are breaching the spirit of the OFT debt collection guidance by using this trace method, which has the potential to reveal to neighbours that individuals are being pursued for payment of debts.
The OFT is calling on businesses in the sector to take positive steps to address these concerns. If businesses continue to use these tactics, the OFT will look to take swift enforcement action.
The OFT has imposed requirements on one 'trace and collect' company, Link Financial Limited (Link), to confirm that it will no longer engage in this practice.
Following an application by Link to renew its existing consumer credit licence, the OFT, working alongside Lambeth Trading Standards, reviewed Link's business practices and raised concerns about the use of this trace method.
Link agreed to stop using the practice and, as allowed under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, made specific proposals which addressed the OFT's concerns. As a result, the OFT has imposed requirements which state that Link must not in future use neighbours to pass on messages to trace subjects.
Nigel Cates, OFT Deputy Director for Consumer Credit, said:
'Using neighbours to pass on messages to trace subjects is an unacceptable practice that contravenes our debt collection guidance. It has the potential, whether unintentional or not, to lead to the disclosure of private financial affairs and to cause distress and embarrassment, and we have made this clear in discussions with the Credit Services Association.
'We are pleased that Link has acted responsibly and taken positive steps to change its policies and procedures.
'If other businesses continue to engage in similar practices we will not hesitate to use our licensing and enforcement powers.'
NOTES
1. The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act) requires debt collectors, businesses that offer goods or services on credit and/or are involved in activities relating to credit or hire, to be licensed by the OFT.
2. In 2003 the OFT issued the debt collection guidance (updated December 2006) which sets out minimum standards for those intending to collect debts. This guidance is intended to set out the type of behaviour the OFT considers to fall within the category of unfair business practices which will call into question fitness to retain or be given a licence. It is expected that applicants and licence holders will abide by the spirit as well as the letter of this guidance.
3. Section 2.6.j of the OFT's debt collection guidance makes clear that that the OFT considers that acting in a way likely to be publicly embarrassing to the debtor is an unfair business practice.
4. Following implementation of the OFT's new powers under the Consumer Credit Act 2006 on 6 April 2008, where the OFT is dissatisfied with any matter in connection with a business, a proposal to carry on a business or any other conduct by a licensee, associate or former associate, the OFT may impose 'requirements' on the licensed business. Requirements may require a business to do or not to do (or to cease doing) anything specified for the purposes connected with addressing the OFT's dissatisfaction, or securing that matters of the same or a similar kind do not arise.
5. Failure to comply with a requirement could lead to a fine of up to £50,000 and/or be grounds for revocation of a consumer credit licence.
6. Two different processes exist for imposition of requirements. One is where an adjudicating officer issues a notice to the trader that the OFT is minded to impose requirements to address dissatisfaction. The trader is then given the opportunity to make representations to the adjudicating officer. The adjudicating officer makes a determination and the trader has the right of appeal against the determination to the Consumer Credit Appeals Tribunal. Alternatively, a business may offer a proposal to address the OFT's dissatisfaction pursuant to section 33D(4) of the Act. In these circumstances the OFT is not required to issue a notice that it is minded to impose requirements if the proposed determination is in the same terms as the proposal made by the business.
7. The fact that requirements have been imposed on Link appears on the consumer credit register. Download a copy of the requirements imposed (pdf 45 kb). We will monitor Link's compliance with the requirements. Any complaints about non-compliance should be sent to:
Free/impartial debt advice: National Debtline | StepChange Debt Charity | Find your local CAB
IVA & fee charging DMP companies: Profits from misery, motivated ONLY by greed
IVA & fee charging DMP companies: Profits from misery, motivated ONLY by greed
0
Comments
-
Requierements................REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THE OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING ('OFT') PURSUANT TO SECTION 33A AND SECTION 33D(4) OF THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974 ('the Act')
REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO:
Link Financial Limited (Consumer Credit Licence Number 446835), registered office address: Camelford House, 8 9 Albert Embankment, LONDON, SE1 7TP
THE OFT REQUIRES AS FOLLOWS:
That as of 1 May 2009:
1 Link Financial Limited shall not ask neighbours to pass on messages to a trace subject and shall decline any offers t o pass on messages.
For the avoidance of doubt, Link Financial Lirnited is not prevented from contacting neighbours of a trace subject providing that
a) such contact is made only for the purposes of ascertaining the current location or address of the trace subject; and
b) no information is given to the neighbour which might identify Link Financial Limited or its reasons for seeking the trace subject.
2 Link Financial Limited will not charge the debtor a fee for locating a debtor's new address unless the original credit agreement allows for such a charge t o be made and passed on to the debtor.
3 Link Financial Limited will not allocate any payments made under section 77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 to reduce the balance on the debtor's account. Instead these payments will be levied as a charge on the customer.
ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS WILL
RENDER LlNK FINANCIAL LIMITED LIABLE TO FURTHER FORMAL ACTION
BY THE OFT. THIS COULD INCLUDE THE IMPOSITION OF FINANCIAL
PENALTIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 39A OF THE ACT AND/OR THE
REVOCATION OF LlNK FINANCIAL LIMITED'S CONSUMER CREDIT LICENCE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 32 OF THE ACT.
Signed:
Ray Watson, Director, Consumer Credit Group
Authorised signatory on behalf of the OFT
Date: 5 May 2009Free/impartial debt advice: National Debtline | StepChange Debt Charity | Find your local CAB
IVA & fee charging DMP companies: Profits from misery, motivated ONLY by greed0 -
About time. If a little late but it's a start in the right direction.Any help, opinions, views I may hold those are my own. Respect them as you would expect the same in return. Offered freely, is gleaned from a lifetime of experiences, knowledge gaining. Passed on to benefit others. I may be direct, ask you questions but those are to help you. Up to you if you choose to take it. I won't judge you either way.
0 -
Can but hope.Free/impartial debt advice: National Debtline | StepChange Debt Charity | Find your local CAB
IVA & fee charging DMP companies: Profits from misery, motivated ONLY by greed0 -
Well they certainly feature here rather often.If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing0
-
1st credit, Mackenzie Hall and now Link!
Well done, OFT.
Who's next?0 -
That's great news!0
-
Excellent news. People should keep reporting to OFT0
-
1st credit, Mackenzie Hall and now Link!
Well done, OFT.
Who's next?
LLoyds TSB would be good, the OFT are sanctioning all theses DCA's, but the actions of LLoyds TSB are no better, in fact they are a lot worse:rolleyes:Thats it, i am done, Blind-as-a-Bat has left the forum, for good this time, there is no way I can recover this account, as the password was random, and not recorded, and the email used no longer exits, nor can be recovered to recover the account, goodbye all ………….0 -
There are folks who think Nationwide is the pits.If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards