»
'Diluting Champagne is MoneySaving.' blog discuss...
(Page 1)
Welcome to MoneySavingExpert.com's Forums!
THE EASY WAY: All the Forum's best tips go in MoneySavingExpert's weekly E-mail Plus you'll get all the new guides, deals and loopholes. It's free & spam free
IMPORTANT! This forum isn't moderated. If you spot a spam, illegal, offensive, racist, libellous post or PM please email abuse@moneysavingexpert.com
Remember, this is an open forum! Anyone can post so always exercise caution when acting on info. Don't post links for personal gain. Except in the referrers section and always declare any interest.
Cheapskate! Don't the crew deserve a drink for all their hard work?
Sure you're saving money, but a few bottles of wine are hardly anything compared to staff, transport, equipment costs. 'Spending a nickel to save a dime' or is that the other way round?
The Following User Says Thank You to sdooley For This Useful Post:Show me >>
I've seen restaurants where they dilute coke, ketchup, beer etc. The trick is to dilute enough so that the customers don't notice. You can just about getaway with a 1:4 dilution.
.. so someone arranged a shoot there, but forgot to arrange the budget for the props being used?
I'd hardly call that moneysaving
Quote:
We are the state's representative in our constituencies and we should not be frightened of taking decisions on behalf of our constituents, because that is to the general good.
The Rt Hon.Kevin Barron MP getting his job description a$$$ about t!!
The Following User Says Thank You to Paul_Herring For This Useful Post:Show me >>
60 glasses is £150 at £15/bottle, which you acknowledge would have bought goodwill from the crew. So rather than spending a fairly nominal £150 on sparkling wine (not champagne, which often costs at least £15/bottle even in a supermarket) which would have pleased your colleagues and pleased the champagne bar, you instead wasted £50 worth of perfectly drinkable wine.
The £150 wouldn't have been wasted, the £50 was.
If something's enjoyed, the money spent on it is not wasted.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to meester For This Useful Post:Show me >>
No, no, no, no, no! That is sacriledge not money saving! Shame on you for even thinking of it .
I would rather have had half a glass of something really nice than a full glass of it watered down - although I suppose it was okay to pour over the champagne pyramid if it was not intended for drinking. Major sympathy for the crew though
Thrifty is good - being a tight!!!! is not so good
A self-confessed grumpy old woman these days.
Proud to be the adopted mum of the beautiful Sarah-Jane
That's not money saving, that's just waste. If you weren't going to drink it why pour it, and if you were going to drink it why dilute it? I reckon the crew deserve spoiling from time to time
Surely you could have used a bit more cunning? Champagne cocktails are all the rage and it is a cheap and easy trick to make people believe they are getting more and give them less ££££.
Instead of diluting with water - dilute with Casis or Raspberry Liquor or brandy etc. mixed in with a bit of fruit and juice. A bottle of Casis costs about £8 and will go a very, very long way and fruit juice is only £2 per carton. Decant and pre-mix it to look really posh. Add fruit to the bottom of each glass and then pour in the mix first to about 1/3 or even 1/2 and then top with champagne. The champagne should float on top - making the drink look really pretty. The alcohol content will still be high because of the liquor.
Everybody wins!!!!
What's funny is that bars charge more for this. Glass of champers £6 Champagne cocktail £10-15....
Decant and pre-mix it to look really posh. Add fruit to the bottom of each glass and then pour in the mix first to about 1/3 or even 1/2 and then top with champagne. The champagne should float on top - making the drink look really pretty.
While I'm sure this is very nice when pouring individual glasses, I'm not sure it would work too well with a pyramid of glasses.
Quote:
We are the state's representative in our constituencies and we should not be frightened of taking decisions on behalf of our constituents, because that is to the general good.
The Rt Hon.Kevin Barron MP getting his job description a$$$ about t!!
Surely the bar was paid for use as a film-set, in which case you would be perfectly entitled to have filled the glasses with coloured water! All a bit of a waste, really!
Pls be nice to all MoneySavers. There's no such thing as a stupid question, and even if you disagree courtesy helps. Take care over copyright. Use excerpts and links rather than copying long text. This site asserts copyright on all comments posted on the board.