We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Aktiv Kapital: The Continuation UPDATE
Options
Comments
-
Under the same user name (and writing style and content) you were barred from another debt help forum for trolling.
Back under your bridge (in Wales I believe)Feel free to answer my question anytime soon !
No, I don't debate with trolls.0 -
Harassed wrote:Under the same user name (and writing style and content) you were barred from another debt help forum for trolling.
Back under your bridge (in Wales I believe)
No, I don't debate with trolls.
I wont even comment on anything else !:rolleyes: It’s hard enough remembering my opinions - without remembering my reasons for them :rolleyes:0 -
Harassed wrote:Under the same user name (and writing style and content) you were barred from another debt help forum for trolling.
Back under your bridge (in Wales I believe)
No, I don't debate with trolls.
Ah Skiannach - I see you are being as disruptive over here as elsewhere - I recognised your style. You always use bold type and colour when trying to make a point. You use silly names like 'Crapquest' and 'Aktiv Krapital'. You refer to them always as 'parasite debt buyers'. You are incapable of participating in a debate without mud slinging especially when you are challenged and cannot answer without giving your agenda away and you always, always post the same National Debt line letters, especially the one about not admitting the debt.
On that point Percy Vere has quite rightly asked what motive you have for always posting that letter. I know from dealing with you in the past that you have an extremely militant attitude to any organisation that collects debt - suggesting that every poster who comes into contact with a dca sends that letter is HIGHLY (using your trick now) irresponsible in situations where the debt is not in dispute and can easily create problems for the original poster that weren't there before you gave your 'advice'. You are preying on the vulnerabilities of others who may be less fortunate than you - really be ashamed, you are sucking innocent people into your own disputes to further your crusade. At least I was always honest - yes I am a debt collector and have been for many years. I can give advice based upon 20+ years working in this sector. It may not always be what people want to hear but it will always be honest with no hidden agenda - can you say the same ?0 -
yes I am a debt collector and have been for many years
And you've been barred for trolling on TWO other debt help sites. I wonder why that was.
How long before you're barred on this one? This is my one and only response to you, I don't debate with trolls.0 -
Harassed wrote:And you've been barred for trolling on TWO other debt help sites. I wonder why that was.
How long before you're barred on this one? This is my one and only response to you, I don't debate with trolls.
I see you are as good as ever at avoiding questions that you can't answer honestly. Labelling people as trolls simply because they don't agree with you confirms my point about you being incapable of participating in a debate without mudslinging.
I am not ashamed of being banned from websites that actively support debt avoidance - fortunately this site seems to have a more balanced opinion as posters on here are not necessarily in trouble financially so are not as blinkered as you.0 -
Tootsie_Roll wrote:...At least I was always honest - yes I am a debt collector and have been for many years. I can give advice based upon 20+ years working in this sector. It may not always be what people want to hear but it will always be honest with no hidden agenda - can you say the same ?
Well, can we all just hold on a moment here and inject a little bit of balance and dare I say politeness back into the entire thread?
As an observer, who reads most of the threads here, I have to say that this one is about the most aggressive, argumentative and in places downright rude ones that I've yet read here - in places it rivals the political "debates" on Palestine and Israel! (I don't include you in that comment Tootsie Roll - not the reason I quoted you.)
Some dissenters, such as Tootsie Roll, have politely stated their interest - others are alleged to work in the debt collection industry.
Now, whatever the rights and wrongs of the arguments, is it not a fact that this is an industry with a serious public "image" problem (some might say that's always inevitable give what they do.)
It has a reputation in places for being exactly what you see at points in this thread - aggressive, threatening, brutal, populated in sometimes places by cowboys, and containing at least some borderline criminal elements. All of this has been exacerbated by TV shows such as Watchdog and Rogue Traders illustrating the worst elements.
On the counter side, you have professional people (and I include TR from what he's written) doing a job that, sad to say, needs to be done - and a difficult and thankless job it is too, to the best of their professional ability.
If people like TR want to join MSE and educate this community with the benefit of their expertise, then I'd say shouldn't we welcome that and learn from them?
Again on the converse side I would hope that TR would also see how harmful it is for new posters to arrive here who appear to be be professional DCs and who then lay into all and sundry in an aggressive manner. To those individuals I would simply ask what purpose do you serve the industry you appear to represent other than confirm general public (mis?) perception?0 -
I am very unhappy to see tootsie roll on this forum he has been banned from other forums the only reason I use this one as opposed to others is it seemed to be free of dca's - I have never read a post of his where constructive advice was offered he is just a troll. A debt with out contact after 6 years is statue barred that is a fact - no argument if people want to take the view that they did not wish to pay this debt that is there own business.0
-
sparkle84 wrote:...the only reason I use this one as opposed to others is it seemed to be free of dca's...
Respect your point of view Sparkle but I sincerely hope it's not the only reason!
I would only reiterate my earlier point in respect of your "free of dca's" comment. Unless you and MSE is going to launch a big public campaign to have them all outlawed and closed down, they are with us and no-one can escape that as a fact of life.
If your past experience of other BBs is that DC's or alleged DCs do turn up simply to be trolls, then that is sad, and even sadder if they don't realise that such behaviour only reflects on them and their profession - in fact it increases the likelihood that incensed people at a popular site like MSE will lobby for tighter industry regulation and practice.
That said, I don't know any of that and can only comment on what TR has said thus far.
It's in their hands - "proof of the pudding and all that" after at least what I've posted to show if they can be constructive and show a human face.0 -
sparkle84 wrote:I am very unhappy to see tootsie roll on this forum he has been banned from other forums the only reason I use this one as opposed to others is it seemed to be free of dca's - I have never read a post of his where constructive advice was offered he is just a troll. A debt with out contact after 6 years is statue barred that is a fact - no argument if people want to take the view that they did not wish to pay this debt that is there own business.
Sparkle84
I am very sorry you think that way - my intention has never been to 'troll' any forum. The two that you mention I have been banned from certainly did not encourage free speech and supported debt avoidance actively. Clearly we were at loggerheads which resulted in my bans. As for constructive advice - there was plenty; in some cases I agreed with the forum (as indeed I do with you about statute barred debt) in others we were polls apart.
Edna_Bucket
Thank you for your comments and support - you certainly confirm my belief that this site has a much more balanced standpoint.0 -
supported debt avoidance actively
I post in response to defend the two sites being defamed (DHUK and Debt Questions). Neither site condones norsupports debt avoidance.
What they do support is making sure that DCA's obey the law in their dealings with debtors, which they very often don't. No one was banned for disagreeing, people were banned for disruptive and abusive posts.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards