We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Great news / terrible news.
kennyboy66_2
Posts: 2,598 Forumite
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/interestrates/3211785/Financial-crisis-Interest-rates-to-hit-lowest-level-since-1694.html
I guess it depends on if you are a borrower or a saver.
May be worth locking into decent saving rates while you can.
I guess it depends on if you are a borrower or a saver.
May be worth locking into decent saving rates while you can.
US housing: it's not a bubble
Moneyweek, December 2005
Moneyweek, December 2005
0
Comments
-
The interest rates being paid in the market will remain a long way above the base rate IMO due to the Government borrowing such vast amounts of money.
Deflation is definitely a big risk and as such the BoE should be cutting rates.0 -
Yep, I doubt if there will be many 2% mortgages out there.
However, everything points to savers rates heading way down.
We will know we are in strange times if War Loan gilts get back to par.US housing: it's not a bubble
Moneyweek, December 20050 -
"It is critical to get rates lower - if the medicine is not working you have to use a stronger dose," he said. "[The Bank] needs to get rates down far and fast.
"They need to be pretty bold. The lowest rates have ever gone is two per cent. They could easily go lower than that now - why not? After all the Federal Reserve [in the US] dropped rates to one per cent."
But what do you do next, if that doesn't work? - you've jumped too quickly to the historically low rate, and have no manoeuvering room left...
Instead of being impatient, the whole global economy needs time to come to terms with the new reality we are facing...time to find a way to live/work without Growth being the mantra?
We need to get some of the growth expectations out of the minds of stock markets.
i.e. Before globalisation, there was always another market to tap, that could lead to growth for a company. Or another source of cheap labour, materials to reduce your costs, allow price reductions to boost your sales/profits.
Now, when even tiny outfits just starting out, such as seen on Dragon's Den, have been to China, visited 'their' factory, booked container loads etc, there is very little room for reducing costs, improving productivity, seeking fresh markets...
And yet the underlying expectation is that companies must post ever rising sales turnover and profit results, otherwise the markets will mark you down...
Growth was 3% around the start of 2008, should losing that 3% really be the cause of "historic" choices on interest rates?
Seems like we are trying to falsely maintain the unsustainable.0 -
Cannon_Fodder wrote: »But what do you do next, if that doesn't work? - you've jumped too quickly to the historically low rate, and have no manoeuvering room left...
The next step is massive, sod the deficit, Keynesian fiscal stimulus.
Who cares if IRs are 2% if inflation ends up at 1%?Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J. K. Galbraith0 -
Purley selfish but I hope my BOE tracker comes through soon before all this as that is going to be pulled.
But Defo bad news for all savers unless inflation plumets.0 -
Personally, I guess that it is good news.
This is because at present, my mortgage debts are greater than my savings, thus from a MSE perspective, it will be good that I will be paying out less interest, even though my earning interest (at a lower level) will also be less.
In essence econimically for me it will be better.
If I did not have debts and only savings then it would not be good news
Obviously there will be far reaching effects for everybody.
I hope there is a stabilisation achieved quickly for everybodies sake:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Cannon_Fodder wrote: »But what do you do next, if that doesn't work? - you've jumped too quickly to the historically low rate, and have no manoeuvering room left...
What's the point of having manouvering room if you are not prepared to manouver into it? Maybe being cautious and delaying drops would simply pro-long the situation
One of the factors why people was wanting interest rates to go up was as a result of the inflation rate.
There is now wide regard that foods / oil etc are dropping and therefore inflation is dropping.
This therefore eases the pressure against dropping interest rates.
Whatever happens, I hope there is stability achieved as soon as possible for everyones sake:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
I care if interest rates are low. My income is from my STR pot.
Gotta get a job now .... damn0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »What's the point of having manouvering room if you are not prepared to manouver into it? Maybe being cautious and delaying drops would simply pro-long the situation
One of the factors why people was wanting interest rates to go up was as a result of the inflation rate.
There is now wide regard that foods / oil etc are dropping and therefore inflation is dropping.
This therefore eases the pressure against dropping interest rates.
Whatever happens, I hope there is stability achieved as soon as possible for everyones sake
Have you noticed the current Interest Rate in the US...?
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Economics/Interest-Rate.aspx?Symbol=USD
At 2% for most of this year, it has not helped stimulate their economy, or restore confidence in their markets. (interesting the LIBOR has grown away from the Central Bank rate, so Banking confidence is little to do with IRs?)
If UK was to drop IR to around 2%;
1) would that make any difference when it already hasn't in the US?
2) what would the effect be on our currency/exports/Balance of Trade?
3) where do we go after 2% when it hasn't worked.
post 2% scenario- the markets could have a bad week, coz of a few economic indicators, and the BoE, already having gone down 0.5% 4 times in 4 months, or 1% twice in 2 months, does what...drops again.
Down another 0.5% to a 300-year record, and instead of working, it worsens the situation, as the markets realise "wow, they must know something we don't, get out now"...
= Bust, permanently.
I'm coming round to some views about media/constant doom & gloom/a little knowledge is a dangerous thing etc...
Everyone expects it to be fixed, done, sorted, almost overnight.
Once upon a time, you had to wait a quarter to see the effect an IR change had.
Now the 0.5% of last week is already being discounted as too little, and people are wanting a 50% cut in IRs...just because they aren't prepared to accept a bit of pain as being part of the learning process so that we don't go back up the road to a bubble for a generation.
Few people seemed to be campaigning for "stability" when the boom was getting out of control. Higher IRs around 2005, could have cooled things off...but that probably infringed someone's "human rights to indebt themselves upto the hilt without any comeback".
Maybe we need to hit bottom good and hard, for stability to be anything other than a short-lived blip on the way back up to another bubble.0 -
Cannon_Fodder wrote: »Everyone expects it to be fixed, done, sorted, almost overnight.
Absolutely. People seem to think there's a magic wand that can be waved to make the troubles go away. And so far, the media aren't doing much to disabuse them of this perception.
We just need to accept that we are in for a nasty recession and focus on the key concepts: Preserving your own wealth (if you have any) on a personal level and preventing a badly-damaged financial system from melting down completely at a government level.
Expecting that we can just wish away a recession with some clever wheeze is a dangerous fallacy. At worst, it could lead to a crazy, last-gasp boom and then an awful bust.--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards