Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@.

Search
  • FIRST POST
    • 320Holmesdale
    • By 320Holmesdale 14th Sep 18, 11:57 AM
    • 3Posts
    • 0Thanks
    320Holmesdale
    Major works, £50k for damp-proofing one flat...
    • #1
    • 14th Sep 18, 11:57 AM
    Major works, £50k for damp-proofing one flat... 14th Sep 18 at 11:57 AM
    Hi there.

    Iíve been served by my management agent with a section 20c estimate (complete with 3 quotes), so I have a month to respond to proposed major works.
    I am a leaseholder in a block of 8 flats, first built in 1890. One of the flats apparently has rising damp, and damp-proofing is required. It was first reported in 2014.
    The total cost proposed is £50k (inc. VAT), spread over the 8 flats, and my share is £6,500. Only £8k of this cost is damp-proofing. The rest is stripping the flat then re-furbing it afterwards. Then there is an 11.5% cut for the surveyor and a 6% cut for the management company.
    I did know about the proposed works when I bought the flat (in Feb), so itís not a total surprise, just the cost isÖ!

    Iíd obviously like to use the consultation period to get an independent surveyor in, to check that this particular damp-proofing is the right plan and assess what work actually needs doing. Also, I can send the list of works proposed to a builder and ask for an estimate to check the costs of the 3 already quoted. Also, the percentage cut for the surveyors and management companiesÖ I understand a charge, but a cut seems unfair. So can anyone help before I sell a kidney to find £6.5k?!!

    - Are surveying/management company charges on major works regulated/recommended? What is reasonable?

    - How much of the resulting costs of damp-proofing are a shared problem? Total re-plastering, a paint job, new sink etc.?

    - Bearing in mind itís not my flat, do I have any rights in getting an independent damp surveyor? They will need access after all.

    Big thanks in advance for any help.
Page 1
    • bxboards
    • By bxboards 14th Sep 18, 2:00 PM
    • 1,566 Posts
    • 1,214 Thanks
    bxboards
    • #2
    • 14th Sep 18, 2:00 PM
    • #2
    • 14th Sep 18, 2:00 PM
    The quote is mind boggling high! Even the 'only 8k' bit....

    Is the flat below ground? ie in a cellar etc? Even then, the quote is high.

    You will have to check your lease to see what you are responsible for.. I'm a little surprised you are being charged for stripping and refurbing, as that isn't really part of the fabric of the building per se, I'd expect the leaseholder of that flat to have to cover that side of things.
    • Smi1er
    • By Smi1er 14th Sep 18, 2:36 PM
    • 576 Posts
    • 390 Thanks
    Smi1er
    • #3
    • 14th Sep 18, 2:36 PM
    • #3
    • 14th Sep 18, 2:36 PM
    So what damp works are getting done for £8K?

    Some internal stripping of plaster might have to happen for the work to be done. If that happens then decoration has to happen. If a kitchen has to be removed to do the works then you might have to pay for the cost of removal/reinstatement, however the same units will be going back. If this happens then remember fitting has to comply with current regs. If the owner decides on a change of kitchen then they have to pay for the new units but they do effectively get free fitting.

    I had drainage work done on my house years ago (collapsed drain so insurance). They had to remove the bath (ground floor bathroom) to gain access. In doing so they damaged a few tiles so had to retile the entire bathroom. When the bath was out I asked what would happen if I replace the bath? I was told that they were paid to remove the bath and toilet, and as the tiles were now damaged they also had to remove the basic. They would refit whatever suite I had. Effectively I got a new bathroom for the price of a new suite.

    I'd be asking for a full breakdown
    • eddddy
    • By eddddy 14th Sep 18, 3:04 PM
    • 6,887 Posts
    • 6,808 Thanks
    eddddy
    • #4
    • 14th Sep 18, 3:04 PM
    • #4
    • 14th Sep 18, 3:04 PM
    As you probably know, a section 20 consultation has strict rules. It has 3 stages:

    1. A notice of intention
    2. Notification of estimates
    3. Notification of award of contract

    It sounds like you're at stage 2.

    Stage 1 would have specified what work was going to be done, and if you didn't agree, ideally you should have challenged it then.

    Now would be the time to challenge the estimates for the work.

    If might be worth reading some of these:
    https://www.lease-advice.org/faq/what-is-the-section-20-consultation-process-for-major-works/
    https://www.lease-advice.org/advice-guide/section-20-consultation-private-landlords-resident-management-companies-agents/

    You can also book a call for free advice here:
    https://clients.lease-advice.org/appointments.aspx
    • 320Holmesdale
    • By 320Holmesdale 14th Sep 18, 4:20 PM
    • 3 Posts
    • 0 Thanks
    320Holmesdale
    • #5
    • 14th Sep 18, 4:20 PM
    • #5
    • 14th Sep 18, 4:20 PM
    Hey everyone, thanks for your replies. I am at stage 2.

    Yup, hands up, ideally I would have challenged the work when I bought the place! But I was knee-deep in other lease issues at the time and I let it go by (a few mates said things like "it cost me 3k to damp proof mine - shouldn't be too bad" HA! Plus, when I asked for an idea of costs, of course the managing agent had no idea.

    I've just spoken to the lease advisory, who were really helpful, but also realistic and unsurprised! His thoughts were:

    The lease says that I the lessee am to contribute to "the expenses of maintaining, repairing and renewing..... the roofs foundations and main structure of the building"

    So - of COURSE I can see an argument that this is part of fabric of the building. But, also, when you buy a basement/lower ground flat (I occupy the other one in the building), you know there's more of a chance of damp, and act accordingly. Could this damp-proofing be viewed as an improvement?

    Also, there are lots of different sorts of damp-proofing - it's worth asking for the management agent to send me the surveyor's reasons to suggest his this course of action (ie, it HAS to be done or the block of flats will fall down).

    All thoughts gratefully received, you kind people.
    • Norman Castle
    • By Norman Castle 14th Sep 18, 5:27 PM
    • 7,405 Posts
    • 6,171 Thanks
    Norman Castle
    • #6
    • 14th Sep 18, 5:27 PM
    • #6
    • 14th Sep 18, 5:27 PM
    Then there is an 11.5% cut for the surveyor and a 6% cut for the management company.
    Surely this is an incentive for them to inflate the price. Why pay either a proportion of the total cost?


    Talk to the other residents about the right to manage.
    Last edited by Norman Castle; 14-09-2018 at 5:30 PM.
    Don't harass a hippie. You'll get bad karma.

    Never trust a newbie with a rtb tale.
    • 320Holmesdale
    • By 320Holmesdale 14th Sep 18, 9:16 PM
    • 3 Posts
    • 0 Thanks
    320Holmesdale
    • #7
    • 14th Sep 18, 9:16 PM
    • #7
    • 14th Sep 18, 9:16 PM
    Thanks. I hear you, but sadly Iím fairly sure weíre past RTM on this particular issue.
    • Tom99
    • By Tom99 15th Sep 18, 6:25 AM
    • 2,614 Posts
    • 1,784 Thanks
    Tom99
    • #8
    • 15th Sep 18, 6:25 AM
    • #8
    • 15th Sep 18, 6:25 AM
    If it was built in 1890 the building may not have had a damp proof course to start with so its introduction now can be seen as an addition or improvement which maybe cannot be charged to you under the maintain/repair/renew clause. It its not there in the 1st place you can't maintain/repair or renew it.
    • Norman Castle
    • By Norman Castle 15th Sep 18, 8:22 AM
    • 7,405 Posts
    • 6,171 Thanks
    Norman Castle
    • #9
    • 15th Sep 18, 8:22 AM
    • #9
    • 15th Sep 18, 8:22 AM
    Thanks. I hear you, but sadly Iím fairly sure weíre past RTM on this particular issue.
    Originally posted by 320Holmesdale
    The suggestion was for future issues. Other residents may be unhappy about the current works, working together is likely to get better results.
    Don't harass a hippie. You'll get bad karma.

    Never trust a newbie with a rtb tale.
    • Hipperty
    • By Hipperty 16th Sep 18, 12:56 PM
    • 7 Posts
    • 3 Thanks
    Hipperty
    I'm new to all things leasehold so have been reading with interest. Would the buildings insurance not cover the damp proofing work?
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

1,208Posts Today

8,250Users online

Martin's Twitter
  • RT @Dora_Haf: @MartinSLewis So many people on here saying they're great until you get your PROPER job. What if Your proper job Is ON zero?

  • RT @hslt88: @MartinSLewis I?m a trustee for a youth charity. We only have a limited pool of funds for flexible youth workers for holiday sc?

  • RT @Dan_i_elle_88: @MartinSLewis Loved working zero hour agency care work. Never out of work and I loved having the flexibility! Only left?

  • Follow Martin