Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@.

Search
  • FIRST POST
    • RK9019
    • By RK9019 6th Dec 17, 10:07 PM
    • 1Posts
    • 0Thanks
    RK9019
    2 Diamonds Help!
    • #1
    • 6th Dec 17, 10:07 PM
    2 Diamonds Help! 6th Dec 17 at 10:07 PM
    Hi all,

    I am hoping someone can help me make a decision!

    I am sure a lot of people are looking for the perfect engagement ring and it can go on and on.

    I have finally found the one I want to buy in a hailo design. I am stuck on which diamond to go into the middle. I have seen both in the flesh and they both look incredible.

    My dilemma goes:

    0.45 carat, VS2, F Colour, Hearts and Arrows Cut

    OR

    0.5 carat, SI2, G Colour, Hearts and Arrows Cut

    The bigger diamond is only slightly bigger but jumps up in price by 230. However the company is telling me that the smaller one is a rarer stone and when you hit half a carat they automatically add a premium in the market place for diamonds.

    Is it worth the jump for a slightly lower quality of diamond but slightly bigger in size by about 0.2mm.
Page 1
    • dj1471
    • By dj1471 6th Dec 17, 10:36 PM
    • 1,176 Posts
    • 798 Thanks
    dj1471
    • #2
    • 6th Dec 17, 10:36 PM
    • #2
    • 6th Dec 17, 10:36 PM
    The difference in size is tiny and the specs of the smaller one are a fair bit better. I'd go for the smaller one.
    • Pollycat
    • By Pollycat 7th Dec 17, 9:16 AM
    • 20,003 Posts
    • 53,674 Thanks
    Pollycat
    • #3
    • 7th Dec 17, 9:16 AM
    • #3
    • 7th Dec 17, 9:16 AM
    I'd go for the smaller one too.
    And be happy that it's (surprisingly) cheaper than the one with not-so-good clarity and colour.
    • 74jax
    • By 74jax 8th Dec 17, 8:51 PM
    • 4,674 Posts
    • 6,372 Thanks
    74jax
    • #4
    • 8th Dec 17, 8:51 PM
    • #4
    • 8th Dec 17, 8:51 PM
    Are you sure the smaller one is cheaper? It appears to be the better diamond?
    Forty and fabulous, well that's what my cards say....
    • Pollycat
    • By Pollycat 9th Dec 17, 8:05 AM
    • 20,003 Posts
    • 53,674 Thanks
    Pollycat
    • #5
    • 9th Dec 17, 8:05 AM
    • #5
    • 9th Dec 17, 8:05 AM
    Are you sure the smaller one is cheaper? It appears to be the better diamond?
    Originally posted by 74jax
    That was my initial thought too, but it's possibly because of this:

    The bigger diamond is only slightly bigger but jumps up in price by 230. However the company is telling me that the smaller one is a rarer stone and when you hit half a carat they automatically add a premium in the market place for diamonds.

    Is it worth the jump for a slightly lower quality of diamond but slightly bigger in size by about 0.2mm.
    Originally posted by RK9019
    I was also told that a .5, 1 carat, 1.5 carat etc diamond was exponentially more expensive than a .49, .99, 1.49 carat stone.
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

60Posts Today

1,469Users online

Martin's Twitter
  • It's the start of mini MSE's half term. In order to be the best daddy possible, Im stopping work and going off line? https://t.co/kwjvtd75YU

  • RT @shellsince1982: @MartinSLewis thanx to your email I have just saved myself £222 by taking a SIM only deal for £7.50 a month and keeping?

  • Today's Friday twitter poll: An important question, building on yesterday's important discussions: Which is the best bit of the pizza...

  • Follow Martin