Finance owing on car we bought

1356

Comments

  • badmemory
    badmemory Posts: 7,720 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    jimjames wrote: »
    I don't think you can say that from the info given.

    Yes I can. A reputable dealer would know better than to land either himself or the new buyer in this position. Also unless the dealer actually changed the ownership of the vehicle then it will be the new owner who is in the dodo not the dealer.
  • arcon5 wrote: »
    http://www.lawgistics.co.uk/legal-article-business-law/motor-trade-advice/special-rights-to-customers-buying-cars-subject-to-hire-purchase



    Straight from the Hire Purchase Act



    Clearly covers my original post. Protection only applies where buyer was unaware of the finance outstanding. This is not the case with op, sadly, so protection wouldn't apply



    The clue to this is in my username. I have sold 5000 cars in my time (retired now) and have come across every possible scenario. If you buy a vehicle as a private buyer from someone in he motor trade, any outstanding finance is the responsibilty of the dealer, and never the private buyer.

    As a dealer you are assumed to have sufficient knowledge of how it all works to ensure that any vehicle you sell has clear title. End of story.

    The finance is the dealers problem and doubtless they will sort it out.

    Even if they don't then the buyer will get clear title eventually.
  • arcon5
    arcon5 Posts: 14,099 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post Combo Breaker
    edited 26 November 2017 at 1:49PM
    The clue to this is in my username. I have sold 5000 cars in my time (retired now) and have come across every possible scenario. If you buy a vehicle as a private buyer from someone in he motor trade, any outstanding finance is the responsibilty of the dealer, and never the private buyer.

    As a dealer you are assumed to have sufficient knowledge of how it all works to ensure that any vehicle you sell has clear title. End of story.

    The finance is the dealers problem and doubtless they will sort it out.

    Even if they don't then the buyer will get clear title eventually.

    Your personal opinion doesn't change FACT.
    And the fact is your wrong. I've quoted THE LAW as it stands. Your personal view doesn't outweigh the law or the opinions of actual legal professionals.

    The laws very clear in that title only passed to the first private buyer whom bought in good faith with no knowledge of outstanding finance. As innocent buyer clause doesn't apply to op title remains with the finance company, they own the car still and can repossess it if they know op bought it knowingly.

    That is the law. "End of story".
  • arcon5 wrote: »
    Your personal opinion doesn't change FACT.
    And the fact is your wrong. I've quoted THE LAW as it stands. Your personal view doesn't outweigh the law or the opinions of actual legal professionals.

    The laws very clear in that title only passed to the first private buyer whom bought in good faith with no knowledge of outstanding finance. As innocent buyer clause doesn't apply to op title remains with the finance company, they own the car still and can repossess it if they know op bought it knowingly.

    That is the law. "End of story".


    Not if he bought it from a dealer they can't.

    What you say is correct regarding a private sale.

    But it's not correct regarding a trade sale.
  • arcon5
    arcon5 Posts: 14,099 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post Combo Breaker
    edited 26 November 2017 at 4:05PM
    Not if he bought it from a dealer they can't.

    What you say is correct regarding a private sale.

    But it's not correct regarding a trade sale.

    No what I say is correct for ops situation as a private buyer from a trade seller.

    You need to do some of your own research pal because right now your spouting absolute nonsense despite having been proven otherwise.

    It's indisputably clear... the private buyer only has protection if he buys it without knowledge of finance. The law states where there is a chain (ie sold to motor trader then private buyer) the first private buyer benefits from the protection.. again if they buy it unknowingly.


    Yet your still arguing the contrary despite the exact law being quoted above and despite a link to an advise page on a legal professionals website.

    Thank God your out of the motor trade with your tunnel vision
  • Bored now....

    The op will get good title to the car.
    The dealer is compelled to and will settle the finance.

    And it's 'you're' not 'your'.
  • Robby1988 wrote: »
    Yea I know I defiantly can’t claim myself an innocent purchaser if it came to that.

    At the moment I’m just taking some comfort from the idea the old owner might be chasing to get this sorted. If he isn’t, my main concern is that by the time the problem lands at my door, the currently affordable £800 settlement will have ballooned thanks to agent fees etc. & heaven forbid they just pitch up and take the thing without notice.

    If only PSA would talk to me, I’d just pay it if it dragged on much longer & then go to the small claims court as someone previously suggested.

    Honestly it won’t get that far.

    The previous owner will be kicking up such a stink that it will all get sorted quickly - in fact if that payment isn’t made this week I’d do a Paddy Ashdown & eat my hat
  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,473 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    edited 28 November 2017 at 8:44PM
    Not if he bought it from a dealer they can't.

    What you say is correct regarding a private sale.

    But it's not correct regarding a trade sale.

    Speaking as another ex motor trader i wholly agree with this. Its down to the dealer to sort of the finance.
  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,473 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    arcon5 wrote: »
    http://www.lawgistics.co.uk/legal-article-business-law/motor-trade-advice/special-rights-to-customers-buying-cars-subject-to-hire-purchase



    Straight from the Hire Purchase Act



    Clearly covers my original post. Protection only applies where buyer was unaware of the finance outstanding. This is not the case with op, sadly, so protection wouldn't apply

    The O/P was told by the dealer the finance was cleared or would be cleared. They bought it in good faith that there was no other company that would have an ongoing financial interest in the car.

    The finance company would have recourse with the dealer, NOT with the innocent private buyer in this case.
  • arcon5 wrote: »
    No what I say is correct for ops situation as a private buyer from a trade seller.

    You need to do some of your own research pal because right now your spouting absolute nonsense despite having been proven otherwise.

    It's indisputably clear... the private buyer only has protection if he buys it without knowledge of finance. The law states where there is a chain (ie sold to motor trader then private buyer) the first private buyer benefits from the protection.. again if they buy it unknowingly.


    Yet your still arguing the contrary despite the exact law being quoted above and despite a link to an advise page on a legal professionals website.

    Thank God your out of the motor trade with your tunnel vision

    Yep. Indisputably clear: that what you said was incorrect.

    The dealer is compelled to settle the finance, even if he doesn't the buyer will get title to the car, and the finance company will pursue the dealer and not the buyer. It can be no other way.

    I thank God I'm out of the motor trade too: it means I no longer have to deal with armchair lawyers wanting a car.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 607.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173K Life & Family
  • 247.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards