Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@. Skimlinks & other affiliated links are turned on

    • darkcloudi
    • By darkcloudi 7th Jul 17, 8:54 AM
    • 499Posts
    • 160Thanks
    Part diagnosed not changed
    • #1
    • 7th Jul 17, 8:54 AM
    Part diagnosed not changed 7th Jul 17 at 8:54 AM
    I have had my car just repaired, now the franchise dealer creates a video of suggestions of what needs to be changed, in my particular instance I was told to change two things (AC Condenser and an oily pipe stating its leaking), of which one (AC Condenser) I can clearly see that was changed and the other apparently still looks like the old item, as its still oily therefore the old one.

    I emailed the franchise dealer asking this question as to my knowledge what was advised has not been changed and in the invoice it states "replaced pipe as previously diagnosed" I am getting told that a different pipe has been changed. Now to be honest I don't know the truth of this since one engineer suggested I should change a particular pipe and now get told something else was changed.

    What I have issues about is if they suggested I change one pipe as it was leaking but they changed something entirely different (I am unsure even if that was even leaking and that I paid for something that probably was not required to be changed, so money wasted)

    The AC is working but what my issue is the firm probably charged me for something that was not required to be changed. I have video evidence of what the engineer suggested to be changed and the invoice clearly states as previously diagnosed, so do you think I have rights to claim back the cost of the pipe? As my gut feeling is the old pipe was a fully working one considering this was not diagnosed in the video and something else was.

    Don't want to mention the dealer at the moment as I've emailed them to see why the pipe mentioned in the video has not been changed.
Page 1
    • caprikid1
    • By caprikid1 7th Jul 17, 9:08 AM
    • 552 Posts
    • 564 Thanks
    • #2
    • 7th Jul 17, 9:08 AM
    • #2
    • 7th Jul 17, 9:08 AM
    What is the bill amount ?
    • darkcloudi
    • By darkcloudi 7th Jul 17, 11:09 AM
    • 499 Posts
    • 160 Thanks
    • #3
    • 7th Jul 17, 11:09 AM
    • #3
    • 7th Jul 17, 11:09 AM
    The bill amount was 1060 - I managed to get it discounted from 1240, not due to this issue but a price match.

    They did respond suggesting the other pipe was leaking not the one the first engineer diagnosed. Not sure what the difference in price is between the two pipes but they have suggested I can bring the car in over the next week and they will check the AC pressure is still there.

    I think its odd that you get told they will do something and then something else is done.
    • Strider590
    • By Strider590 7th Jul 17, 11:37 AM
    • 11,622 Posts
    • 6,534 Thanks
    • #4
    • 7th Jul 17, 11:37 AM
    • #4
    • 7th Jul 17, 11:37 AM

    This explains a lot.......

    At the end of the day, if something can be fixed without replacing parts, BUT still takes hours of labour, then the customer is usually unwilling to pay up.
    I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.

    <><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/
    • loskie
    • By loskie 7th Jul 17, 12:56 PM
    • 1,251 Posts
    • 751 Thanks
    • #5
    • 7th Jul 17, 12:56 PM
    • #5
    • 7th Jul 17, 12:56 PM
    ask them to show you the new part fitted to your car
    • jobdone1
    • By jobdone1 7th Jul 17, 1:10 PM
    • 719 Posts
    • 540 Thanks
    • #6
    • 7th Jul 17, 1:10 PM
    • #6
    • 7th Jul 17, 1:10 PM
    F, me people have money to throw away these days.
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

3,832Posts Today

8,341Users online

Martin's Twitter
  • Facebook today admitted in parliament that after it heard of my defamation lawsuit against it for 50 fake scam ads?

  • RT @jamiesusskind: After more than 10 years, and with such sadness, I am leaving Labour. I'm doing it for the same reason that I joined: be?

  • RT @Deeangelique_: I suggested @MartinSLewis get 'I Don't Do Ads' tattooed to his forehead yesterday. Today he posted this. I gave Martin L?

  • Follow Martin