“
I am so grateful for YM posting here, as their posts have persuaded me to never knowingly buy a YM home.
Originally posted by lincroft1710
”
No-one would buy a house from the company if they were made fully aware of this -
"Restrictive covenants apply to changes to your property such as, sheds or outbuildings, conservatories, structural alterations, changing of windows or doors or any additions, alterations to fencing, addition of patio or pathways, driveway alterations, alterations to the facades, or external building additions such as aerials, sky dishes as well as registering a business at the address or parking business vehicles, vans or caravans on driveways. Each of these are considered breaches."
Tenants have more power over the homes they rent than a home owner with these restrictions.
Doesn't the law have things to say about unfair clauses? Would it be considered fair to have to pay the house builder because part of the fence was damaged in a storm and you replaced it or that you needed a new aerial for the TV?