Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@.

    • dcdubber87
    • By dcdubber87 14th Oct 16, 12:37 PM
    • 20Posts
    • 9Thanks
    MET services PCN help
    • #1
    • 14th Oct 16, 12:37 PM
    MET services PCN help 14th Oct 16 at 12:37 PM
    Good afternoon,

    Thanks for taking the time to read my post, just after a little bit of help and guidance.

    On the 8th september myself and partner parked at bicester village train station and bought a ticket and put it in the dashboard as usual. upon returning that evening we had a PCN from MET services for no displayed ticket with the reason ;

    no valid ticket/voucher/permit - in breach of railway bylaw 14.

    I was a bit shocked and opened the car to find the ticket in the footwell of the car. can only think it blew off when shutting the door as it was a windy day. After reading various things on the internet about this company i did nothing, coupled with being away with working travelling the last 3 weeks. Had a letter come through the post today from MET services titled 'NOTICE TO OWNER' addressed to my wife as it was her car stating the parking charge of 100 is payable and a photo of the rear of the car on the letter.

    I still have the notice given and the actual parking ticket i brought. Where do i stand in this situation? has it been to long to appeal it? as the new letter says if you wish to appeal this notice, please do not pay at this time. which makes sense.

    any help would be great.
    thanks rob
Page 3
    • Umkomaas
    • By Umkomaas 18th Apr 17, 4:20 PM
    • 17,233 Posts
    • 27,145 Thanks
    is it worth contacting the railway company about the issue, in this case Chiltern Railways?
    Personally, I wouldn't bother. I don't think this is going anywhere beyond the irritant of debt collector letters.

    As your original 'contravention' took place on 8 September 2016 you are now beyond the 6 months limitation for Chiltern (not MET) to bring a byelaws criminal prosecution.

    The position of private parking operators and their conflation between byelaw and contractual law in 'managing' statutory controlled land is far too complicated and heavily laden against them for a lightweight outfit like MET to be contemplating being the first PPC in the land to take such a case before a judge.

    Your next milestone date is 8 September 2022, when the Statute of Limitations kicks in, and MET are legally timed-out from starting any legal proceedings (they currently have 6 years to bring a civil case).
    We cannot provide you with a silver bullet to get you out of this. You have to be in for the long run, and need to involve yourself in research and work for you to get rid of this. It is not simple. We will help, but can't do it for you.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

1,203Posts Today

6,385Users online

Martin's Twitter
  • RT @Kirsty_M_N: KFC Take off the disgusting skin & coating and eat the chicken with salad (lettuce) I presume they'll have.

  • OK. Im taking a break from discussing today's poll to go for a run (i'll need it with all those calories to come!)

  • There's always one! Dave. You can't have Nando's. You've been shipwrecked. The choice is what it is. This real l?

  • Follow Martin