“
D. Health (the NHS £124bn)
The budget should NOT be reduced, the cost of running the NHS will always increase year on year and above inflation.
Originally posted by Gordon the Moron
”
That wasn't the plan when the NHS was formed. It was thought that improvements in health would cause a natural cap on the expenditure.
However the NHS is paying out for things it shouldn't be. In 2005/6 there were over a quarter of a million admissions to NHS hospitals in England for
selected alcohol-related diagnoses (mental and behavioural disorders due to alcohol, alcoholic liver disease and toxic effects of alcohol). Hospital admissions for these diagnoses have virtually doubled since 1997. Overall probably around 1 in 16 of all hospital admissions are for alcohol-related causes.
Alcohol-related diseases account for 1 in 8 NHS bed days (around 2 million) and 1 in 8 NHS day cases (around 40,000).
The Strategy Unit calculated the cost to the NHS in England and Wales of treating alcohol-related conditions to be up to £1.7 billion per annum.
So if we could stop using hospitals as drying-out units for the Friday night befuddled we could make a hefty slice of savings.
It's tempting to cut overseas aid, but abolishing it entirely would only save £12bn, less than a 10% cut in NHS.
Social Protection - a stupidly high spend but hard to cut across the board without causing hardship. And if there are economies elsewhere in public spending (much of which is salaries) then unemployment is likely to rise.
Figures are probably for England/Wales only - Scotland has a higher per capita spend under Barnett formula and so could come in for some sensible economies.