PPI Reclaiming Discussion part 4

Options
13567…2705

Comments

  • maxdp
    maxdp Posts: 3,873 Forumite
    Options
    Hi Di

    That looks good just take all the others off now and they will be easily recognisable.

    Does everyone agree with this? We can then refer people back to this. May I also make a suggestion that we do not "quote" with every posting, unless needed. That will also cut down on the length of this FORUM.

    Again what do people think. Do you agree or not.
    :mad:
  • di3004
    di3004 Posts: 42,579 Forumite
    Options
    maxdp wrote: »
    Hi Di

    That looks good just take all the others off now and they will be easily recognisable.

    Does everyone agree with this? We can then refer people back to this. May I also make a suggestion that we do not "quote" with every posting, unless needed. That will also cut down on the length of this FORUM.

    Again what do people think. Do you agree or not.


    I have added my above post to Incipience's SAR on first page, so I will delete the above now about the details, is that okay folks?;) Please go back and check.

    Anyone want to add anything, in case I missed anything ?
    Incipience, your cool at this sort of thing, anything, cheers.

    I will then delete everything else not required here. X
    The one and only "Dizzy Di" :D
  • pinknico
    pinknico Posts: 3,261 Forumite
    Options
    Agree about the quotes, unless the post is miles away and needs to be added for relevance.
    DS1 12/10/04
    DS2 13/07/06
    DD1 06/12/07
  • booi666
    booi666 Posts: 745 Forumite
    Options
    shouldnt you put ''WITHOUT PREJUDICE'' ON THE SARS request in case it goes to court?
    :j Let him who be deceived ,be deceived:j
  • maxdp
    maxdp Posts: 3,873 Forumite
    Options
    Thank you Di.

    Glad you agree Pinknico. It will help sometimes I find you go through pages and pages of the same long posts. Anyway we can see how it works.

    Hi Boo that makes sense.
    :mad:
  • pinknico
    pinknico Posts: 3,261 Forumite
    Options
    What a good idea Boo. Thank you.
    DS1 12/10/04
    DS2 13/07/06
    DD1 06/12/07
  • booi666
    booi666 Posts: 745 Forumite
    Options
    Im not just a village jester:beer:
    :j Let him who be deceived ,be deceived:j
  • marshallka
    marshallka Posts: 14,585 Forumite
    Options
    booi666 wrote: »
    shouldnt you put ''WITHOUT PREJUDICE'' ON THE SARS request in case it goes to court?
    Why would you use the words "without prejudice on a sar" ??

    A legal phrase that allows parties to discuss and negotiate a settlement to a legal claim, without admitting liability. Any documents headed "without prejudice" cannot be used in evidence in any subsequent court case without the permission of both parties.
  • di3004
    di3004 Posts: 42,579 Forumite
    Options
    booi666 wrote: »
    Im not just a village jester:beer:

    Thank you Boo.:T
    I will leave it stand for now as its the SAR that Incipience posted and if its ok by Incipience - I will add that in, but I know what you mean, thanks Boo.;)
    Hope that is okay.;)
    The one and only "Dizzy Di" :D
  • booi666
    booi666 Posts: 745 Forumite
    Options
    How to use 'without prejudice' to protect your interests

    If what you say in your attempts to settle a dispute (with a customer, supplier or employee, for example) is 'without prejudice', it means what you say can't be used against you if the dispute turns into court proceedings.
    :j Let him who be deceived ,be deceived:j
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards