PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Covenant for house builder that no longer exists

Options
Hello. We're in the process of buying a house, and there is a covenant in place on the property that states any alterations to the property need to have permission from the original builder.

Our solicitor advises there is no such company on Companies House and after some extensive Googling, I can find no mention of the company or any successor.

Does this mean we can safely assume we'd likely not need to seek permission if we wanted to extend etc.?

Other properties in the same street have extended, added conservatories etc., so assume they'd be in the same situation, so we can ask them, but thought it was worth asking.
«1

Comments

  • ethank
    ethank Posts: 2,197 Forumite
    Holiday Haggler I've been Money Tipped!
    Options
    You might need to purchase an indemnity
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    "The original builder" wasn't necessarily a limited company. If they were, then they'd be on CoHo, even if they were long-since dissolved.

    The chances of any successor to the builder coming after you are approximately zero. Your call.
  • Reed_Richards
    Reed_Richards Posts: 4,166 Forumite
    First Post Name Dropper First Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Options
    ethank wrote: »
    You might need to purchase an indemnity
    Or get the vendor to purchase an indemnity for you as a condition of sale. It usually works that way round.
    Reed
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    Options
    Just as a bit of a rant, why on earth do people purchase with such one-sided conditions?
  • Nebulous2
    Nebulous2 Posts: 5,116 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    Just as a bit of a rant, why on earth do people purchase with such one-sided conditions?

    New ....... Shiny .....house......must have.......gimme, gimme, gimme.....




    Conditions you say, paah, gimme..........
  • NeilCr
    NeilCr Posts: 4,430 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    Just as a bit of a rant, why on earth do people purchase with such one-sided conditions?

    In my case.

    By far the most suitable for me, best situated house in the town I wanted to live in, We have a number of covenants - none of which bother me - and the vast majority of folks who live here feel the same.

    I get why people don't like them. I know my partner, for instance, loves the house but wouldn't live here - mainly because of the restrictions (she rails against anything like that) and the lighting is a bit iffy late at night. But they suit some of us and - personally - I wish a few on here (not you AnotherJoe) wouldn't be so derogatory of those who have made an informed choice.

    Now those people who buy the houses with covenants and then rail against them and/or try to break them - that's different!
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    Options
    In the OPs case, as he's worded it he'd have to pay money to change the colour of his front door, add a conservatory, change the windows, put a velux in the loft, etc. And thats if the builder graciously allows it. Its almost worse than owning a grade 1 listed :mad:
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    Just as a bit of a rant, why on earth do people purchase with such one-sided conditions?
    Because you'd be pointlessly eliminating a huge proportion of the housing stock if you followed a policy of avoiding all such conditions - the vast majority of which are either actually unenforceable or for all practical purposes unenforceable (and can be insured against).
  • Tiexen
    Tiexen Posts: 724 Forumite
    First Post First Anniversary
    Options
    To stop you doing this:


    stripy-candy-townhouse-Kensington-576808.jpg
  • NeilCr
    NeilCr Posts: 4,430 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    In the OPs case, as he's worded it he'd have to pay money to change the colour of his front door, add a conservatory, change the windows, put a velux in the loft, etc. And thats if the builder graciously allows it. Its almost worse than owning a grade 1 listed :mad:

    Well, yes, but.

    Some of us don't want to do any of those things. And most of those are in my covenants. I am more than happy with my house as it is

    As I say I, completely, get that others feel different.

    Perhaps :mad: is more than a bit sad. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean that it doesn't work for others.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards