Green, ethical, energy issues in the news

Options
19293959798805

Comments

  • zeupater
    zeupater Posts: 5,355 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker
    Options
    NigeWick wrote: »
    My understanding is that AI is learning to learn. And, with the rate of progress expected it will soon be time for a real life living wage payment to the whole population paid for from the earnings of our machines. ;)
    Hi

    Isn't that the same theory as perpetual motion ... ? ... :eek:

    .. in the real world a 1kW generator is initially supplied with 1kW of power in order to start generating enough power to keep itself running ... however system inefficiencies (sound/heat etc) drain away a proportion of the available power on every cycle ... the machine slows due to power starvation ... it stops ...

    A man initially has £1 ... he buys some product made by an automated machine for £1 ... the cost of the running the machine & material procurement is covered, the machine makes a huge profit, the owner takes a small cut, the government takes a larger one to run whatever it needs to run and less than £1 is paid to the man ... rinse, repeat ... system inefficiencies (profit/tax etc) drain away a proportion of the available money on every cycle ... the payments to the man slows resulting in real starvation ... he stops, dies, shuffles of his mortal coil, he is no more - he is an ex-human ...

    I've yet to see anyone who's ever described or predicted a form of perpetual motion to be proved right, so I doubt that the proponents of this new form will either .. :cool:

    HTH
    Z
    "We are what we repeatedly do, excellence then is not an act, but a habit. " ...... Aristotle
    B)
  • Martyn1981
    Martyn1981 Posts: 14,762 Forumite
    Name Dropper Photogenic First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    NigeWick wrote: »
    My understanding is that AI is learning to learn.

    Tesla's have been sending back info for years from their 8(?) cameras. Japan is to start trialing self-driving taxis next year, but only on some specific pre-mapped routes.
    Mart. Cardiff. 5.58 kWp PV systems (3.58 ESE & 2.0 WNW)

    For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
  • Martyn1981
    Martyn1981 Posts: 14,762 Forumite
    Name Dropper Photogenic First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    Australian Islands and isolated comunties are switching from diesel to a mix of renewables, storage, fly-wheel and coughdieselcough back up.

    Coober Pedy enjoys 100% renewables after switch to hybrid solar, wind + battery system
    South Australia’s iconic opal mining town of Coober Pedy has successfully – and finally – made the shift to clean energy, and is already achieving periods of 100 per cent renewables since the completion of its wind, solar, battery storage and diesel hybrid system last month.

    Hydro Tasmania, which engineered and installed the hybrid renewables solution, said on Thursday that the project was performing slightly above expectations in its early weeks, contributing an average of 80 per cent renewables in October, and running the local grid entirely on renewable energy for more than half of that time.

    The result notches up another win for Hydro Tasmania, whose busy Hybrid Energy Solutions team recently took Rottnest Island to 45 per cent renewables, with up to 90 per cent instantaneous renewable contribution achievable.

    It has done the same for Flinders Island, where a hybrid energy hub will be switched on in December, with the aim of meeting at least 60 per cent the island’s 6.7 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of annual demand with renewables, and minimising the output of its 3MW diesel power station.

    And, of course, it has done the same for the large King Island, where Hydro Tasmania’s prototype wind, solar and battery system – aimed at providing 65 per cent of the Bass Strait island’s energy needs from renewables – has regularly achieved 100 per cent renewables, on one occasion for 33 hours straight.
    Mart. Cardiff. 5.58 kWp PV systems (3.58 ESE & 2.0 WNW)

    For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
  • zeupater
    zeupater Posts: 5,355 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker
    edited 7 December 2017 at 2:39PM
    Options
    Martyn1981 wrote: »
    Tesla's have been sending back info for years from their 8(?) cameras. Japan is to start trialing self-driving taxis next year, but only on some specific pre-mapped routes.
    Hi

    Yes, that's exactly the issue. With safety critical applications the AI can't be allowed to learn by mistake - just think of the consequences - the approach has to be to use the AI between the sensors and the lines of instruction and when there's no applicable 'rule', request to be 'taught' (aka programmed) ...

    For example, the AI in this case is to take a visual representation of an object and compare to a database ... a lorry may be a different colour, shorter, taller but it's still a lorry so the AI system needs to compare what it 'sees' from one angle, compare it to a database of similar items which will almost certainly be from different perspectives/angles and decide what it is ... if it's the front of a lorry and the sensors show that the distance between the two vehicles is decreasing at the rate which matches your own vehicle speed, then it's a stationary lorry with the cab facing you and therefore different decisions must be taken than if it was moving or facing the opposite direction, but are the indicators working?, is the cab door open?, could there be a driver stepping into the road? .. that's what the AI interface does, collect, interpret and compare to a preset library of rules .... if there are no rules identified, a default set of actions are taken, maybe in this example the pre-allocated solution would be to stop and wait for a while to see if the situation changes before selecting an alternative route or simply connect to a control room to await some form of instruction ... there's loads of options, but at this stage of AI development those will certainly not include a 'try this and see what happens' learning process.

    HTH
    Z
    "We are what we repeatedly do, excellence then is not an act, but a habit. " ...... Aristotle
    B)
  • Martyn1981
    Martyn1981 Posts: 14,762 Forumite
    Name Dropper Photogenic First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    Good news, unless you own a coal plant.

    ‘Death spiral’: half of Europe’s coal plants are losing money
    More than half of the European Union’s 619 coal-fired power stations are losing money, according to a new report. As a result, the industry’s slow plans for shutdowns will lead to €22bn in losses by 2030 if the EU fulfils its pledge to tackle climate change, the report warns.
    “The changing economics of renewables, as well as air pollution policy and rising carbon prices, has put EU coal power in a death spiral,” said Matt Gray, co-author of the Carbon Tracker report. “Utilities can’t do much to stop this other than drop coal or lobby governments and hope they will bail them out.”

    Gray said coal-fired electricity capacity could be replaced by cheaper renewables, with building new onshore wind and solar PV projects projected to be less expensive than operating existing coal plants by 2024 and 2027 respectively. “That is a striking finding, something that would be have been unimaginable five years ago,” he said. “The energy consumer deserves the lower cost options.”
    The expected coal use across the globe in coming decades, particularly in Asia, has fallen sharply recently. In 2013, the International Energy Agency expected world-wide coal-burning to grow by 40% by 2040 – it now anticipates just 1% growth.
    Mart. Cardiff. 5.58 kWp PV systems (3.58 ESE & 2.0 WNW)

    For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
  • NigeWick
    NigeWick Posts: 2,715 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post First Anniversary Debt-free and Proud!
    Options
    zeupater wrote: »
    I've yet to see anyone who's ever described or predicted a form of perpetual motion to be proved right, so I doubt that the proponents of this new form will either .. :cool:
    Depends on what you call perpetual. If a few billion years will suffice, how about the moon going round Earth? :beer:
    The mind of the bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.
    Oliver Wendell Holmes
  • NigeWick
    NigeWick Posts: 2,715 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post First Anniversary Debt-free and Proud!
    Options
    Martyn1981 wrote: »
    Good news, unless you own a coal plant.
    If governments were to subsidise renewables and batteries the way they have fossil and nuclear generation we'll be laughing.
    The mind of the bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.
    Oliver Wendell Holmes
  • zeupater
    zeupater Posts: 5,355 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker
    Options
    NigeWick wrote: »
    Depends on what you call perpetual. If a few billion years will suffice, how about the moon going round Earth? :beer:
    Hi

    That's just a lump of rock in a frictionless environment which has a mass great enough to overcome the relatively small forces acting upon it on a daily basis .. increase/decrease the forces (ie take a cut of the profits/change the energy/upset the force balance) and the orbit will decay or grow ... it's already moving away at about 1.5"/year, so we don't want to upset the balance ... just think of Mart's tidal lagoon and the knock on effects on his health, by the time they've built it there'd be no tides left & he'll be assigned to work the pits to keep the lights on, or there'll be 50m tides every day, which doesn't sound good for his solar generation! .... :(;)

    HTH
    Z
    "We are what we repeatedly do, excellence then is not an act, but a habit. " ...... Aristotle
    B)
  • Martyn1981
    Martyn1981 Posts: 14,762 Forumite
    Name Dropper Photogenic First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    Martyn1981 wrote: »
    UK government to release funding for mini nuclear power stations

    Not sure how to call this. £100m isn't actually that much, so I suppose covering all bets is a good idea.

    The problem though is that they hope to get them to commercial viability by 2030, and down to a cost of £60/MWh. But on-shore wind and PV are well below that today, and off-shore wind contracts for 2023 are approx £60/MWh and have already been issued. If storage is cheap by 2030, why fill it with nuclear leccy if RE leccy is cheaper.

    Update on this story. It's been spotted (really?) that the first SMR's will cost more than large scale nuclear, but after enough have been built, approx 5-6GW (and sold to whom?) they will drop to large scale nuclear costs, with the ideal being that they reach £60/MWh after 2030.

    Power from mini nuclear plants 'would cost more than from large ones'

    So nuclear (large or small) has now fallen behind renewables in cost, is falling further behind, but if we spend enough time and money, then we 'might' get £60/MWh leccy from SMR's in 2030, only 13yrs later than wind and PV in the UK, and which are still falling in price all over the world.

    I'm past baffled now. Going back - low carbon and cleaner than coal, great let's have some if economically competitive. But today, when are we going to stop funding the more expensive and less popular technologies, and start doing what almost every other country on the planet is doing.

    Various UK governments turned their backs on developing wind energy technology in the UK, but now this one thinks Rolls Royce is going to sell expensive mini-nukes to other countries in 2030 (at around $80/MWh), when they are contracting PV and wind as low as $20/MWh today?

    Rant (baffled rant) over.
    Mart. Cardiff. 5.58 kWp PV systems (3.58 ESE & 2.0 WNW)

    For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
  • zeupater
    zeupater Posts: 5,355 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker
    Options
    Martyn1981 wrote: »
    Update on this story. It's been spotted (really?) that the first SMR's will cost more than large scale nuclear, but after enough have been built, approx 5-6GW (and sold to whom?) they will drop to large scale nuclear costs, with the ideal being that they reach £60/MWh after 2030.

    Power from mini nuclear plants 'would cost more than from large ones'

    So nuclear (large or small) has now fallen behind renewables in cost, is falling further behind, but if we spend enough time and money, then we 'might' get £60/MWh leccy from SMR's in 2030, only 13yrs later than wind and PV in the UK, and which are still falling in price all over the world.

    I'm past baffled now. Going back - low carbon and cleaner than coal, great let's have some if economically competitive. But today, when are we going to stop funding the more expensive and less popular technologies, and start doing what almost every other country on the planet is doing.

    Various UK governments turned their backs on developing wind energy technology in the UK, but now this one thinks Rolls Royce is going to sell expensive mini-nukes to other countries in 2030 (at around $80/MWh), when they are contracting PV and wind as low as $20/MWh today?

    Rant (baffled rant) over.
    Hi

    I suppose the issue they've missed is that by the time all of this new nuclear capacity comes on line, energy from other sources will likely be 'too cheap to meter' ... _pale_:whistle::silenced: ... ;)

    HTH
    Z
    "We are what we repeatedly do, excellence then is not an act, but a habit. " ...... Aristotle
    B)
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards