IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.
Sudden QDR solicitor bill of £4500
Comments
-
Indeed, QDR ARE WH
What is the amount on the NtK? The KEEPER is only liable for THAT amount. Nothing more. This is absoluitely clear in POFA.0 -
0
-
nosferatu1001 wrote: »Indeed, QDR ARE WH
What is the amount on the NtK? The KEEPER is only liable for THAT amount. Nothing more. This is absoluitely clear in POFA.
The NTK would be £20 x 33 which would be £660. But now QDS and ZZPS have apparently both added on their fees. I have asked them for a breakdown of these fees. I have tried to explain that I only found out about this last week as they confirmed their letters went to my previous address. I don't even have the original evidence but have asked for this now. Thanks for this information- I was assuming I might have to pay them a 'reasonable' cost for their admin but £128 each is not reasonable.0 -
The NTK would be £20 x 33 which would be £660. But now QDS and ZZPS have apparently both added on their fees. I have asked them for a breakdown of these fees. I have tried to explain that I only found out about this last week as they confirmed their letters went to my previous address. I don't even have the original evidence but have asked for this now. Thanks for this information- I was assuming I might have to pay them a 'reasonable' cost for their admin but £128 each is not reasonable.
Why pay a fake admin charge, it is QDR who are trying
to rip you off. ZZPS cannot add on anything
As said above the face value of the ticket is £20 and they
can only claim for that plus a court fee, maybe a bit of interest and
a reasonable legal fee and the court would not let you be
ripped off with unreasonable fees
It's the £30 DVLA fee that is of most interest
By now, no doubt QDR/WRIGHT HASSALL are reading this thread.
Nobody cares if ZZPS is
So far, all this points to a fraudulent claim against you, just like
the Cardiff case0 -
Why pay a fake admin charge, it is QDR who are trying
to rip you off. ZZPS cannot add on anything
As said above the face value of the ticket is £20 and they
can only claim for that plus a court fee, maybe a bit of interest and
a reasonable legal fee and the court would not let you be
ripped off with unreasonable fees
It's the £30 DVLA fee that is of most interest
By now, no doubt QDR/WRIGHT HASSALL are reading this thread.
Nobody cares if ZZPS is
So far, all this points to a fraudulent claim against you, just like
the Cardiff case
Thanks. I just don't know how and why they are still getting away with this. Hopefully not for too much longer. Where is their sense of ethics? I have been reading up a lot on this and am disgusted. I guess if they are unreasonable I will report them to SRA, CSA and my local MP if necessary. If they continue, they will have to take me to court for the money. I'm happy to pay a parking charge if indeed I do owe it, but I don't like to be ripped off, intimidated or scammed into paying what I do not owe. It is criminal.0 -
Thanks. I just don't know how and why they are still getting away with this. Hopefully not for too much longer. Where is their sense of ethics? I have been reading up a lot on this and am disgusted. I guess if they are unreasonable I will report them to SRA, CSA and my local MP if necessary. If they continue, they will have to take me to court for the money. I'm happy to pay a parking charge if indeed I do owe it, but I don't like to be ripped off, intimidated or scammed into paying what I do not owe. It is criminal.
Have a read of this
https://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/search?q=indigo
Wright Hassall were the masterminds and everyone was
disgusted that such a gestapo type attack should happen
to hospital staff.
The judge in the main case clearly had no idea
Wright Hassall got a lot of dirt on their faces which will
probably remain forever because the whole country
read about them.
Now they use their offshoot QDR but it is still
Wright Hassall and the same tactics are being used0 -
Have a read of this
Wright Hassall were the masterminds and everyone was
disgusted that such a gestapo type attack should happen
to hospital staff.
The judge in the main case clearly had no idea
Wright Hassall got a lot of dirt on their faces which will
probably remain forever because the whole country
read about them.
Now they use their offshoot QDR but it is still
Wright Hassall and the same tactics are being used
It is disgusting! It also flies in the face of POFA 2012 that the staff had to pay the £128 per ticket when it was initially £20!
c) POFA 2012 rules that the charge on the NTK must be the same as that on the NTD [8(2)(c), (2)(c). 2, 3(b)(i)]
d) POFA rules that the keeper is only liable for the charges set out on the signage and NtD [4(5), 8(2)c,2)(c). 2, 3(b)(i)]
I hope they appeal and get this overturned. What was also interesting about that was the breakdown of fees that made up the £128 - none of which were DVLA information charges! It seems that some politicians are getting on board now and things might change in the future.0 -
Well I have not heard back from QDR solicitors in response to my letter yet but did receive the following email from ZZPS:
Good afternoon
Thank you for your email.
1. Photographic evidence can be viewed at https://www.ipaymypcn.net.
2. We do not need to give you a breakdown of the charges because it is business sensitive information.
3. This is the final time we will respond to your correspondence from yourself.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343K Banking & Borrowing
- 250K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.6K Spending & Discounts
- 235.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 607.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173K Life & Family
- 247.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards