IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.
URGENT: UKPC & SCS Law
Comments
-
Scary perhaps. But stating the process of enforcement (whilst making clear how enforcement can be avoided) is not misleading.
They are instructed to recover £160, fine, my beef is that they state that amount is contractual and I'm not convinced it is, because most signs refer to indemnification, not routine and fixed charges. But I've not seen the sign.0 -
Scary perhaps. But stating the process of enforcement (whilst making clear how enforcement can be avoided) is not misleading.
It's not just scary, it is a blatant attempt to extort money
Bailiffs, attachment to earnings etc ...... before the event ??
This rubbish makes the SRA look rubbish if they cannot
control these rogues0 -
Is it still URGENT?? OR has the boat sailed?0
-
now SCS has replied back..i will post the letter on here shortly0
-
https://imgur.com/a/vUYUm
https://imgur.com/a/RwzZm
This is their response to the letter sent asking for the documents
They have given 30 days to reply so what do i respond back with now?
They have sent contract, site map and photos of vehicle entering and leaving0 -
https://imgur.com/a/vUYUm
https://imgur.com/a/RwzZm
This is their response to the letter sent asking for the documents
They have given 30 days to reply so what do i respond back with now?
They have sent contract, site map and photos of vehicle entering and leaving
2)There's no mention of UKPC having the power to take people to court
3) And perhaps more importantly, the 3 hour time limit isn't listed as one of the restrictions. But the restrictions state that a valid parking permit must be displayed at all times.
Is this the same car park?0 -
Looking at the "contract" it appears to run from 31st October 2013 for an initial period of 36 months... so there's no evidence that it was renewed in October 2016There's no mention of UKPC having the power to take people to courtAnd perhaps more importantly, the 3 hour time limit isn't listed as one of the restrictions. But the restrictions state that a valid parking permit must be displayed at all times
I would also be arguing that example signs in light of this evidential issue are not good enough. They could be from anywhere...Is this the same car park?0 -
-
Underneath the last redaction. It's a ropey copy, but from what I can see of it, suggests it's good enough.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 342.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 249.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.4K Spending & Discounts
- 234.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 607.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 172.8K Life & Family
- 247.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.8K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards