PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Privately rented flat gone into receivership - what can we do?

Hi all, and thanks in advance for reading. Hoping to get some advice from this great forum.
My partner and I have been privately renting our flat for the past 7 years. In that time the property has been managed by 4 different estate agents (the first estate agents were a family company who actually owned the property and so were also our landlord, although we never met them in person) Sadly, the Mother of the family who also ran the business suddenly passed away 2 years after we moved in, hence why the management of the property then passed to another estate agent. In the time that we have been here we have always paid our monthly rent on time and have renewed our tenancy agreement each year at the end of July.
The flat has recently gone into receivership and we have now received letters from the receivers including 'Appointment of LPA Receiver' This is where is gets complicated....We had literally both just signed our new 12 month tenancy agreement on 25th July '18 and returned it to our current Estate Agent to renew for another year, along with making our monthly rent payment for August. The receivership notice was dated 20th July but we didn't receive it or know anything about it until until 26th July when it arrived in the post (but was dated 20th July!) The timing of it all is terrible!

The receivers have told us that none of this is valid and that they need to make arrangements with us to come and do evaluations/gas inspections etc. (I've only managed to do a little bit of research on this matter before turning to this forum for advice, but I think that the fact that they acknowledge that we are tenants here is a positive in itself?)
We're confused as to what our rights as tenants here are and whether it's within the law for the receivers to deem our most recent renewal tennancy void??
We've been in touch with our current estate agent who we've always had a good relationship with and they've basically said that it's nothing to do with them now and that all future matters go through the receivers.
The receivers are stating that we're now on a rolling monthly contract.
Just don't know where we stand here.....?

Does anyone have any experience of this? or can anyone advise in any way? Any advice would be massively appreciated.

Comments

  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post Combo Breaker
    Read:


    * Repossession: what if a LL's mortgage lender repossesses the property?


    (applies equally to bankruptcy /receivership)
  • watson1312
    watson1312 Posts: 38 Forumite
    Thanks for this info. Interesting.
    Is it worth disputing that we didn't actually receive the notice from the receivers until after we had signed the new tenancy agreement?
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 16,405 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post Name Dropper
    watson1312 wrote: »
    Is it worth disputing that we didn't actually receive the notice from the receivers until after we had signed the new tenancy agreement?

    I doubt that's relevant.

    What will be important is the date that the LL went into receivership, not the date that you found out about it.
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    The key question is actually who authorised the renewal?
  • The current Estate agency authorised the renewal, obviously before they were informed of the repossession too.
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    watson1312 wrote: »
    The current Estate agency authorised the renewal, obviously before they were informed of the repossession too.
    Should make for an interesting discussion.


    Right here's the bottom line.


    You will need to move at some point, the receivers will need to liquidate assets to pay creditors.


    That will take time, arguing over 6 months probably isn't worth while (you've got atleast 6 months there even if eviction started today).


    Best thing to do is negotiate with the receivers for a mutual surrender once you have somewhere new to live.


    Also check that they have your deposit (or was it in the custodial scheme?)
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post Combo Breaker
    From a legal perspective, I suspect that

    * the agent signed the new contract with you on behalf of the original landlord
    * thus it was the original landlord's 'instruction' that would have made the contract valid
    * however, at the time the contract was signed, the landlord was no longer the owner, thus his instruction to the agent was null and void
    * the new landlord (Receivers) had given the agent no instruction to sign, and had no legal relationship with them

    The contract is, I believe, therefore null and void.

    However I'm not a lawyer, nor have any personal experience of this precise scenario, so I might be wrong.

    Plus of course courts can sometimes be unpredictable, so if this contract was ever determined in court, the judge might go either way!
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    G_M wrote: »
    From a legal perspective, I suspect that

    * the agent signed the new contract with you on behalf of the original landlord
    * thus it was the original landlord's 'instruction' that would have made the contract valid
    * however, at the time the contract was signed, the landlord was no longer the owner, thus his instruction to the agent was null and void
    * the new landlord (Receivers) had given the agent no instruction to sign, and had no legal relationship with them

    The contract is, I believe, therefore null and void.

    However I'm not a lawyer, nor have any personal experience of this precise scenario, so I might be wrong.

    Plus of course courts can sometimes be unpredictable, so if this contract was ever determined in court, the judge might go either way!
    I agree, I think it would get even more complicated if the OP was charged for this renewal.


    I tend to side with your interpretation that it is ultimately null and void; despite being made in good faith
  • parkrunner
    parkrunner Posts: 2,610 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post
    Have you stopped paying the old agency? You should now be paying the receiver's agent.
    It's nothing , not nothink.
  • Our last payment was made on 25th July to our Estate Agency as per usual, before we knew of the repossession. We are aware that future payments need to be paid to the receivers.

    As for the money we have just paid, we've been in touch with the estate agency and they took their fee and passed the remainder onto the LL (this was before they knew anything of the repossession too)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 607.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173K Life & Family
  • 247.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards