IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.

Resident Parking

1235731

Comments

  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 37,430
    Name Dropper First Post First Anniversary
    Forumite
    edited 22 January 2018 at 9:02PM
    markudman wrote: »
    Why is it that IPC only have a PO box address?
    on BPA website they have a full address and phone no,
    You'll need to ask the IPC that.

    Perhaps they don't want irate people throwing bricks through their windows.
  • markudman
    markudman Posts: 351
    First Anniversary
    Forumite
    mmm funny that
    We may not win by protesting, but if we don’t protest we will lose.
    If we stand up to them, there is always a chance we will win.
  • markudman
    markudman Posts: 351
    First Anniversary
    Forumite
    markudman wrote: »
    I got to know Chris Grayling quite well during Brexit,
    I have spoke to him about the great GLADSTONES / IPC / IAS SCAM, he is going to look in to it. I also told him about the Parking (Code of Practice) Bill 2017-19. lets see what happens

    I have checked and it’s definitely something that DCLG are looking to sort out at the moment. They have responsibility for parking rules – and the regulation of operators. They are working on suitable plans.

    Best wishes

    Rt Hon Chris Grayling MP
    MP for Epsom and Ewell
    Secretary of State for Transport
    We may not win by protesting, but if we don’t protest we will lose.
    If we stand up to them, there is always a chance we will win.
  • KeithP wrote: »
    You'll need to ask the IPC that.

    Perhaps they don't want irate people throwing bricks through their windows.
    Wouldn't they be (physically) based at The Terrace, High Legh Park Golf Club, Warrington Road, High Legh, Knutsford, Cheshire, WA16 6AA?

    --Kirchenmaus
  • markudman
    markudman Posts: 351
    First Anniversary
    Forumite
    I am not sure how to put this letter together, without looking like an idiot, can ypu please read it and advise,
    Many thanks
    Mark

    To whom it may concern,
    My Appeal Ref:
    Issued on by Parking Control Management (UK) Ltd
    to vehicle registration
    Originally rejected by operator on 2018
    The adjudicator made their decision on 2018
    I would like to verify that the adjudicator is in fact a registered barrister or solicitor with the SRA.
    Under ADR directive - SCHEDULE 3 Regulation 9(4)
    Please can you supply the details of this person.

    Requirements that a competent authority must be satisfied that the body meets ...

    Transparency

    5. The body makes the following information publicly available on its website in a clear and easily understandable manner, and provides, on request, this information to any person on a durable medium—
    (a) its contact details, including postal address and e-mail address;
    (b) a statement that it has been approved as an ADR entity by the relevant competent authority once this approval has been granted;
    (c) its ADR officials, the method of their appointment and the duration of their appointment;

    Please see this link for further details of the ADR Directive
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/542/pdfs/uksi_20150542_en.pdf
    We may not win by protesting, but if we don’t protest we will lose.
    If we stand up to them, there is always a chance we will win.
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    You can also complain ton Trading Standards.
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • Fruitcake
    Fruitcake Posts: 58,155
    Name Dropper Photogenic First Anniversary First Post
    Forumite
    markudman wrote: »
    I am not sure how to put this letter together, without looking like an idiot, can ypu please read it and advise,
    Many thanks
    Mark

    To whom it may concern,
    My Appeal Ref:
    Issued on by Parking Control Management (UK) Ltd
    to vehicle registration
    Originally rejected by operator on 2018
    The adjudicator made their decision on 2018
    I would like to verify that the adjudicator is in fact a registered barrister or solicitor with the SRA.
    Under ADR directive - SCHEDULE 3 Regulation 9(4)
    Please [STRIKE]can you[/STRIKE] you supply the details of this person.

    Requirements that a competent authority must be satisfied that the body meets ...

    Transparency

    5. The body makes the following information publicly available on its website in a clear and easily understandable manner, and provides, on request, this information to any person on a durable medium—
    (a) its contact details, including postal address and e-mail address;
    (b) a statement that it has been approved as an ADR entity by the relevant competent authority once this approval has been granted;
    (c) its ADR officials, the method of their appointment and the duration of their appointment;

    Please see this link for further details of the ADR Directive
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/542/pdfs/uksi_20150542_en.pdf

    I would leave that out. I think the POFA says the adjudicators have to be legally trained. It's the IAS that says that they are barrisatas or soliciting. ;)

    I think it's more important to ask the question and see what they say. I'm not sure who you can complain to if they refuse to tell you.

    If they do answer, then you can check the name against the SRA to see if the IAS have lied.
    I married my cousin. I had to...
    I don't have a sister. :D
    All my screwdrivers are cordless.
    "You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks
  • markudman
    markudman Posts: 351
    First Anniversary
    Forumite
    Copy of PCM Sign
    Can anybody spot any problems with it?
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/js866e67u2m2ion/PCM%20Sign.png?dl=0
    We may not win by protesting, but if we don’t protest we will lose.
    If we stand up to them, there is always a chance we will win.
  • Got this today, Really Really Scared now LOL

    We have received notification from the IAS - The Independent Appeals Service that after adjudication of your
    case they have decided to reject your appeal. You will have also received notification rejecting your appeal
    along with the adjudicators' comments.
    Please note that your appeal has now been rejected by Parking Control Management and The Independent
    Appeals Service and there is now no further opportunity for you to appeal the above PCN.
    As previously advised the full parking charge of £100.00 will apply in the event your appeal is rejected by the
    IAS.
    This reminder is to inform you that from the date you received your decision, you had fourteen days to make
    payment of the full outstanding balance.
    Amount Paid to Date: £0.00
    Amount Outstanding: £100.00
    If payment is not made to us within the time frame, the case will be passed to a Debt Collection Agency who
    may add any reasonable administration costs and may commence enforcement proceedings via the County
    Court.
    We would ask you to consider the implication if this case was heard in a County Court and a County Court
    Judgment (CCJ) is successfully obtained against the driver. Additional Court Fees and Solicitors Costs could be
    incurred and added to the outstanding debt. If no payment is received is received we may refer your case to
    our instructed debt Recovery Company and/or Solicitors, at which point the charge will increase to £160.00.
    In order to avoid the above course of action you must make payment in full to the address shown overleaf. If
    you wish to pay by Credit or Debit Card you can call our payment line on 0845 867 9445. Further information
    and payment methods can be found on the reverse of this letter.
    Yours sincerely,
    PCM Appeals Team
    We may not win by protesting, but if we don’t protest we will lose.
    If we stand up to them, there is always a chance we will win.
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    edited 24 January 2018 at 1:06PM
    You are scared by that, a begging letter from a denture deficient debt collector, better avoid watching Telly Tubbies.

    Do get a grip, this is a scam, in most residential parking cases which get to court the PPCs crash and burn.r
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 342.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 249.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 234.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 607.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 172.8K Life & Family
  • 247.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.8K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards