IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.
NW Parking Management - Not parking within marked within markings
Torslanda
Posts: 14 Forumite
Hi all,
Newbie here, but I have read the newbies post and have a good idea what to do, but I have a few specific questions I'm hoping some of you might be able to help with, so I hope it's OK to start this thread.
[Sorry, as a new user I can't post full links]
The background is that my car was parked in Carlisle on a private car park and I have received a NTK for the alleged infraction of "not being parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space". I can't find too many examples of this on the forums here. Please see below images of the NTK and their photographs of my car. I have heavily redacted and anonymised these as I know that the PPCs monitor these forums. However, as you'll see, the only wheel that is over the white line is no more than about 4cm over. Furthermore, this was an end space and no vehicle could have parked on that side of my vehicle. In fact, if anything, this could only have maximised vehicular access for the vehicle next to my car. Please also see Google Street Maps image below of the car park and the space in question. The space was the one occupied by the grey Audi in that photograph, and as my vehicle had been reversed in, the wheel which was over the line was in the position of the Audi's front near side wheel in that photo.
Google Street Map image of car park and space: postimg.cc/image/espg3stwb/
PCN page 1: postimg.cc/image/tnwf109vv/
PCN page 2: postimg.cc/image/828yudegb/
PCN photos of car: postimg.cc/image/5k5nci1mz/
Car park signs 1: postimg.cc/image/r8m5xo59n/
Car park signs 2: postimg.cc/image/glscs9k9n/
Car park signs 3: postimg.cc/image/718q5dfi3/
Car park signs 4: postimg.cc/image/718q5dfi3/
My contention is therefore that a 4cm overhang was not reasonable grounds to invoke a condition requiring the driver to "park correctly within the markings" and that it was issued by an overzealous parking attendant motivated more by profiteering than proper management of the car park, who did not apply the discretion that a reasonable person would do under the circumstances. In short, it was unreasonable, and my defence is one of de minimis (padi.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360006354853-De-Minimis).
During my research I also found this Guardian article (theguardian.com/money/2013/apr/18/how-challenge-parking-ticket) which states:
I'm also intending to hit them with a GDPR Subject Access Request.
I'm currently preparing the initial 'appeal' but in the meantime would be grateful for any advice on the following:
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Newbie here, but I have read the newbies post and have a good idea what to do, but I have a few specific questions I'm hoping some of you might be able to help with, so I hope it's OK to start this thread.
[Sorry, as a new user I can't post full links]
The background is that my car was parked in Carlisle on a private car park and I have received a NTK for the alleged infraction of "not being parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space". I can't find too many examples of this on the forums here. Please see below images of the NTK and their photographs of my car. I have heavily redacted and anonymised these as I know that the PPCs monitor these forums. However, as you'll see, the only wheel that is over the white line is no more than about 4cm over. Furthermore, this was an end space and no vehicle could have parked on that side of my vehicle. In fact, if anything, this could only have maximised vehicular access for the vehicle next to my car. Please also see Google Street Maps image below of the car park and the space in question. The space was the one occupied by the grey Audi in that photograph, and as my vehicle had been reversed in, the wheel which was over the line was in the position of the Audi's front near side wheel in that photo.
Google Street Map image of car park and space: postimg.cc/image/espg3stwb/
PCN page 1: postimg.cc/image/tnwf109vv/
PCN page 2: postimg.cc/image/828yudegb/
PCN photos of car: postimg.cc/image/5k5nci1mz/
Car park signs 1: postimg.cc/image/r8m5xo59n/
Car park signs 2: postimg.cc/image/glscs9k9n/
Car park signs 3: postimg.cc/image/718q5dfi3/
Car park signs 4: postimg.cc/image/718q5dfi3/
My contention is therefore that a 4cm overhang was not reasonable grounds to invoke a condition requiring the driver to "park correctly within the markings" and that it was issued by an overzealous parking attendant motivated more by profiteering than proper management of the car park, who did not apply the discretion that a reasonable person would do under the circumstances. In short, it was unreasonable, and my defence is one of de minimis (padi.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360006354853-De-Minimis).
During my research I also found this Guardian article (theguardian.com/money/2013/apr/18/how-challenge-parking-ticket) which states:
In my case, they do not know who the driver was, and the NTK was sent 3 days after the alleged transgression.[FONT="]Check that any Notice to the Registered Keeper was sent out more than 28 days after the parking ticket was issued. If it was sent earlier then the parking company cannot sue the registered keeper for any alleged parking charges. If the parking company requested that the DVLA provide the name and address of the registered keeper earlier than 28 days after issuing a ticket, it cannot sue the registered keeper. It also may be a breach of the Data Protection Act, for which the DVLA may be liable.[/FONT]
I'm also intending to hit them with a GDPR Subject Access Request.
I'm currently preparing the initial 'appeal' but in the meantime would be grateful for any advice on the following:
- How winnable is this?
- What do the Guardian mean by "NTK must be after 28 days"? Mine was well within this. What statute or case law are they referring to and how do I use this in my defence?
- When should I issue the GDPR SAR? At the same time as the initial appeal (i.e. go nuclear and hit them with everything at once to let them know this is going to be difficult)? Or after they have rejected my initial appeal (by which time they are likely to be out of time to comply with Article 14 anyway)?
- Do you think my SAR could be considered "manifestly unfounded or excessive" and that they could ignore it on those grounds? Should I tone it down a bit?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
0
Comments
-
Have you read the NEWBIES FAQ sticky thread?
Have you sent an initial appeal to the PPC?
Was there a windscreen Notice to Driver?0 -
Have you read the NEWBIES FAQ sticky thread?Have you sent an initial appeal to the PPC?Was there a windscreen Notice to Driver0
-
There is no preparation required for the initial appeal.
Copy the template!0 -
hard to see how an ANPR camera was able to see the car parked over a line
"the NTK was sent 3 days after the alleged transgression. "
was a ticket placed on the car?0 -
As there was no windscreen ticket, that 28 days mentioned by the Guardian is not relevant.
In your case they have to get the NtK to the Keeper within fourteen days of the incident and have done so.
Just send the blue text template appeal to the PPC.
Send it as it is.
Send it as the keeper.
That's all there is to it at this stage.0 -
-
Thanks Quentin. Shall I include the aggressive part:Firms of your ilk were unanimously condemned in 2018 as operating an 'outrageous scam' (Hansard 2.2.18). The BPA & IPC were heavily criticised too; hardly surprising for an industry where so-called AOS members admit to letting victims 'futilely go through the motions' of appeal and say on camera 'we make it up sometimes' (BBC Watchdog).
Also:I will be making a formal complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner,0 -
Thanks twhitehousecat,
I'm sure it wasn't an ANPR as I have been back since and looked around the car park. There are no cameras. I believe it was an 'on foot' attendant snooping around checking tickets and taking photographs of anything he/she thought could make them some extra money.0 -
Thanks Quentin. Shall I include the aggressive part:
... or is that likely to just annoy them and make them dig their heels in?
Also:
... I don't know who the landowner is. It was just a car park (not a store, retail park, hospital etc. car park).
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=74649885&postcount=60 -
Gosh... I love reading these forums but it never amazes me to observe human nature and the inability to process information properly...Just send the blue text template appeal to the PPC.
Send it as it is.
Send it as the keeper.
That's all there is to it at this stage.Thanks Quentin. Shall I include the aggressive part:
... or is that likely to just annoy them and make them dig their heels in?0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 342.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 250K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.5K Spending & Discounts
- 234.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 607.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 172.9K Life & Family
- 247.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards