Buildings insurance, house will be mostly unoccupied for a few months during extension work
andrewilley
Posts: 16 Forumite
We're buying a house which we don't intend to move into straight away, wanting to get some work done before occupying the house. Would it more likely be better to let our current Buildings & Contents insurers extend or add a new Buildings-Only policy, or just take out something new and separate?
We'd be moving in fully within about 6 months though, so we would want the flexibility to reverse that situation and have our new property covered for full Buildings & Contents and the old one set to unoccupied Buildings-only while we do that one up to sell.
Thanks for any advice.
Andre
We'd be moving in fully within about 6 months though, so we would want the flexibility to reverse that situation and have our new property covered for full Buildings & Contents and the old one set to unoccupied Buildings-only while we do that one up to sell.
Thanks for any advice.
Andre
0
Comments
-
Before you decide what's better, you will need to see if you're current insurer will cover the building whilst it's empty and/or undergoing the work. Some won't.0
-
Most insurers wont cover you during works and unoccupancy is a big issue for them. Id suggest site insurance which assumes unoccupancy and covers the existing building and new works. Try www.selfbuildinsure.co.uk as they are underwritten by Aviva0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 607.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173K Life & Family
- 247.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards