What a waste.
Options
[Deleted User]
Posts: 0 Newbie
Saw a notice in a Supermarket window recently.
It said that, due to a manufacturing error, the product contained a substance (I think it was nuts), which wasn't included in the list of ingredients.
The notice went on to say that, if you have bought this product, you should not eat it, but return it for a full refund.
So a huge amount of food is to be scrapped, not because it is inedible, but because some people are allergic to one of the ingredients.
Why not just say "If you have bought this product, and are allergic to nuts, please return it for a full refund."
It said that, due to a manufacturing error, the product contained a substance (I think it was nuts), which wasn't included in the list of ingredients.
The notice went on to say that, if you have bought this product, you should not eat it, but return it for a full refund.
So a huge amount of food is to be scrapped, not because it is inedible, but because some people are allergic to one of the ingredients.
Why not just say "If you have bought this product, and are allergic to nuts, please return it for a full refund."
0
Comments
-
I've never returned an item because of one of those warnings as I'm luckily not medically diagnosed with a nut/lactose/milk/gluten intolerance.
I'd still eat itEx forum ambassador
Long term forum member0 -
Bedsit_Bob wrote: »Why not just say "If you have bought this product, and are allergic to nuts, please return it for a full refund."0
-
Op, you do know it's not compulsory, the food police won't come knocking on doors of people who don't return it?
In all likelihood anyone not allergic to the ingredient will just keep the food and eat it regardless, so not sure where the 'huge amount of food to be scrapped' comes from.
If you're not allergic to the ingredient would you really return it for a refund?Accept your past without regret, handle your present with confidence and face your future without fear0 -
I have to say that - not having a nut allergy - if I'd bought an item that shouldn't have contained nuts but did contain nuts in error, I'd not bother returning the item. I'd eat it. Unless of course, the addition of nuts would spoil the taste.
I can't see mass return of whatever item it was.0 -
Don't return it and just enjoy yourself ya big daredevil0
-
Matt_Jones wrote: »Don't return it and just enjoy yourself ya big daredevil
We don't even know if the OP actually bought the item.
I'd guess not.0 -
If you've ever seen anyone in anaphylactic shock you'd know why they take so much care over it.0
-
I liked the one a few months ago that they had to recall because they may contain nuts & it didn't say nuts in the ingredients. The product? Covered nuts!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards