PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.Boundaries
Options
jemz0001
Posts: 93 Forumite
Hi
we purchased and moved in to a house 3 years ago and this week the landlord of the neighbouring property approached me to tell me that a previous owner of the house, at least 20 years ago had taken a strip of land that belonged to his property and had tarmaced and fenced it with permission of a previous tennant.
The landlord told me that he had approached the previous owner 11 years after this had taken place to make him aware that it was his land and that in the future if he were to sell his property or develop it he would be taking it back. He said he had sent a solicitors letter to the previous owners and they reaponded to acknowledge the letter.
My query is where do we stand. We purchased the property as it sits via a solicitor who carried out all the searches etc and nothing was flagged up. This part of the property is tarmaced and fenced and our gates etc will need to be moved and will prevent car access down the side of our house...
Where do we stand legally if he attempts to take this land back?
Thanks in advance...
we purchased and moved in to a house 3 years ago and this week the landlord of the neighbouring property approached me to tell me that a previous owner of the house, at least 20 years ago had taken a strip of land that belonged to his property and had tarmaced and fenced it with permission of a previous tennant.
The landlord told me that he had approached the previous owner 11 years after this had taken place to make him aware that it was his land and that in the future if he were to sell his property or develop it he would be taking it back. He said he had sent a solicitors letter to the previous owners and they reaponded to acknowledge the letter.
My query is where do we stand. We purchased the property as it sits via a solicitor who carried out all the searches etc and nothing was flagged up. This part of the property is tarmaced and fenced and our gates etc will need to be moved and will prevent car access down the side of our house...
Where do we stand legally if he attempts to take this land back?
Thanks in advance...
Mortgage - 05/03/10
£ 110,743.90 Aim to reduce mortgage to 105k by end of 2010
Car loan - 05/03/10
£5093.15 Aim to pay off car loan by end of 2010 :j
£ 110,743.90 Aim to reduce mortgage to 105k by end of 2010
Car loan - 05/03/10
£5093.15 Aim to pay off car loan by end of 2010 :j
0
Comments
-
You may be able to claim adverse possession of the land as it has been part of your property for so long. This might be complicated by the letter that was sent. However, given he didn't physically take the land back you may be ok. Have a Google on the law of adverse possession.
The garden law website and forum is very useful.
From bitter, bitter experience boundary disputes are expensive, stressful and time consuming. They are best settled out of court if possible.0 -
What does the Title Plan to your property show? Where is the boundary? (£3 from here).
What does the Title Plan to your neighbour's property show? Where is the boundary? (£3 from here).0 -
I believe the law of adverse possession requires you (or the previous owners) to have had the land uncontested for 10 years. If it was 11 years before he sent a letter, and you can prove it was 11 years I think you are safe.0
-
Also Does he still have the letter where the previous owner acknowledged his letter?
I'm no help at all. But Good luck. And I hope it works out. ��
Stashbuster - 2014 98/100 - 2015 175/200 - 2016 501 / 500 2017 - 200 / 500 2018 3 / 500
:T:T0 -
I'd be surprised if a claim for adverse possession would succeed. By all means try, but let us know what happens when the Land Registry write to your neighbour.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/adverse-possession-of-1-unregistered-land-and-2-registered-land
Rely on the title plan. That's what you bought 3 years ago. That's what you own.0 -
Do you have contact details for the previous owner - in order to get in touch with them and state this has happened/get their verdict on whether they stole part of the garden (phrased somewhat differently to that) and ask what they propose to do about this?
I know I would want to start by finding out whether this neighbour is telling the truth - though, I have to admit, my suspicion is that they are. If they're not telling the truth = no problem. If they are telling the truth = then I guess it equals they want you to buy their land off them and I would be finding out whether I could get the previous owner to pay for it (as you've bought the house in all innocence of what that previous owner got up to).0 -
Rely on the title plan. That's what you bought 3 years ago. That's what you own.
At some point in the purchase, before exchange, your solicitor should have asked you to check that the title plan matched the situation on the ground. You were the only party who could do that. If there was a discrepancy large enough to build a driveway, it's likely you would have noticed.0 -
You have to remember that the solicitor didn't visit the property. All they had was the plan. They have done all the checks and searches using what was on the plan. If the land belonging to next door was not on the plan the only person who would have known this would have been you because you would have seen both the house and the plan. So what was on the plan?0
-
The law says it is what you see 'on the ground' that you buy. The plan is not reliable because of scale etc.
It is a total minefield though. Putting the law into practice is very hard. And prohibitively expensive in many cases.0 -
The law says it is what you see 'on the ground' that you buy. The plan is not reliable because of scale etc.
It is a total minefield though. Putting the law into practice is very hard. And prohibitively expensive in many cases.
You have mentioned you have gone through a rough time about boundary issues and I have read other posts and seen news items about how insane boundary issues can get. I listen to other people's misery and thank them for giving me an inexpensive and painless lesson by avoiding a similar fate. I only hope the OP heeds your words and proceeds with them echoing in his mind if things get a bit tricky.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards