“
Have you read this?
Have they complied? If not and it gets to court a judge may take a dim view
Nine times out of ten these tickets are scams, so consider complaining to your MP after the election, as it can cause the scammer extra costs and work, and has been known to get the charge cancelled.
Parliament is well aware of the MO of these private parking companies, many of whom are former clampers, and on 15th March 2019 a Bill was enacted to curb the excesses of these shysters. Codes of Practice are being drawn up, an independent appeals service will be set up, and access to the DVLA's date base more rigorously policed, persistent offenders denied access to the DVLA database and unable to operate.
Hopefully life will become impossible for the worst of these scammers, but until this is done you should still complain to your MP, citing the new legislation.
Just as the clampers were finally closed down, so hopefully will many of these Private Parking Companies.
.
Originally posted by The Deep
”
Hello, thanks for your message, I have contacted trading standards, thanks to your help and advice. The message I wrote to them is below. Would you or any other knowledgeable people be able to give it a once over please?
Dear Sir/Madam,
I have received a "parking charge" from Premier Parking Solutions Ltd, PD Box 471, Newton Abbot, TQ12 9FX, for parking at Keaton Rd Car Park, Ivybridge, PL21 9DH
I believe their "parking charge" constitutes an unfair term in a consumer contract under CRA 2015.
As a blue badge owner, I also feel I have been the victim of indirect discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
This is because the period of parking under the "parking charge" starts at 17:51, yet my purchased ticket starts at 17:55. The ticket "expired" at 18:00, yet I paid 70p to park for an hour. I believe this constitutes "contra proferentem", i.e. that the t&cs were ambiguous, perhaps deliberately so, in order to disadvantage me.
Also, under the Equality Act 2010, I am entitled to "reasonable adjustments" and to not make reasonable adjustments constitutes an act of indirect discrimination. The period of parking expired, according to the "parking charge" at 19:07. Given that I paid for an hour at 17:55, the grace period of 12 minutes is not sufficient to allow me to get my parking ticket, get back to the car and exit the carpark. Nor is it sufficient to allow me to return to the car.
Premier Parking Solutions are a member of the IPC (Independent Parking Committee) and their own guidance says only that "drivers should be allowed a sufficient amount of time to park and leave the site". It does not give an amount of time.
Also, given that the "parking charge" was from the moment I entered the carpark to the moment I left, I do not believe they have given any "grace period" at all under the IPC's own terms and conditions, and clearly this was not extended for a disabled person, who has a right to reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010.