MSE News: Benefits 'may be linked to pay, not inflation'

Options
"Benefits may be linked to average pay rather than inflation, according to reports ..."
«1345

Comments

  • somethingcorporate
    Options
    And rightly so. Seems bitterly unfair that those on low pay see their pay frozen or tiny increases whilst those on benefits see 5%+ rises. It encourages the wrong kind of behavior.
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • working
    working Posts: 213 Forumite
    Options
    Common Sense at last.
  • Morlock
    Morlock Posts: 3,265 Forumite
    edited 18 September 2012 at 1:16PM
    Options
    What a great motivation for government to encourage businesses to keep wages low. Don't raise wages because the benefits bill will increase, yet all of the ignorant sheep bleat "Yes, great idea, at last." Stupid, stupid people.
  • alinwales
    Options
    I think it's shareholders who encourage businesses to keep wages low, not the Government.
  • BigAunty
    BigAunty Posts: 8,310 Forumite
    Combo Breaker First Post
    Options
    Haven't they tinkered before with what benefits were tied with and how benefit increases are calculated?

    I seem to remember reading that if JSA had kept pace with some other kind of tracking system, it would be worth £120 a week now instead of £71. Can't remember what it was linked with though, such as cost of living or inflation or whatever.

    Having said that, a person on NMW wouldn't be too happy with job seekers earning around 60% of what they do for a 35 hour week.
  • foofi22
    foofi22 Posts: 2,199 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    Morlock wrote: »
    What a great motivation for government to encourage businesses to keep wages low. Don't raise wages because the benefits bill will increase, yet all of the ignorant sheep bleat "Yes, great idea, at last." Stupid, stupid people.

    Not sure what talking sheep have to do with this.

    Yes, great idea, at last
  • Cpt.Scarlet
    Options
    And rightly so. Seems bitterly unfair that those on low pay see their pay frozen or tiny increases whilst those on benefits see 5%+ rises. It encourages the wrong kind of behavior.
    Like eating proper food, heating your home in the winter, making sure your children are clothed, you're right, truly awful behaviour.
  • Morlock
    Morlock Posts: 3,265 Forumite
    Options
    alinwales wrote: »
    I think it's shareholders who encourage businesses to keep wages low, not the Government.

    A combination of both, but this policy would give more motivation for the government to intervene. Tories would like to see the minimum wage scrapped, whilst Labour have discussed introducing a living wage. A sum which more realistically reflects the cost of living. The government play a huge role in the level of wages.
  • Morlock
    Morlock Posts: 3,265 Forumite
    Options
    foofi22 wrote: »
    Not sure what talking sheep have to do with this.

    Yes, great idea, at last

    Baaaaahhh!
  • seven-day-weekend
    Options
    Fair enough. People on NMW often don't have a rise every year (unless the NMW is increased). Don't see why it should be any different for those on benefits.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards