Santander Refer a Friend
Comments
-
-
I'd have thought the prudent thing to do would be to wait to see if there is a deluge of forumites with issues.. if not, it'll be the o/ds is the issue.
If doing the switch over the phone it may also be worth confirming with them on the call that switching multiple accounts is fine and in accordance with the t and c / not abuse, thus meaning you can refer back to that recorded call if there is any subsequent action by Santander.0 -
If doing the switch over the phone it may also be worth confirming with them on the call that switching multiple accounts is fine and in accordance with the t and c / not abuse, thus meaning you can refer back to that recorded call if there is any subsequent action by Santander.0
-
If doing the switch over the phone it may also be worth confirming with them on the call that switching multiple accounts is fine and in accordance with the t and c / not abuse, thus meaning you can refer back to that recorded call if there is any subsequent action by Santander.
If ask and get answer dont like even though isnt a breach of any terms and conditions then have to abide by answer, multiple switches have been paid out for myself and I would have thought many others.
In fact by asking kinda putting across that feel it is as on mind self guilt, bit late for many of us to start asking now .:rotfl: I would suggest say as little as possible during switch phone call. :lipsrseal
More answers might be forthcoming this week with what is paid out ( or not paid out)0 -
You could, but it wouldn't prevent the situation above from happening or give you the protection you may think it would (Santander don't need to justify a decision to end their relationship with you or enter into any discussion about it, and the decision will be taken at a higher level than the CSR you speak to). Furthermore, you might be incorrectly told that it is abuse.
True but imo it would give a good basis for a complaint albeit one that may ultimately need to go to the FOS.
Firstly, if Santander have explicitly confirmed in the phone call that all is fine then I suspect the outcome of any complaint regarding non payment of the vouchers would be upheld by the FOS.
Secondly, I know banks can end their relationship with you as per standard t and c but from what I’ve read they can’t just do so without any good reason. In a lot of cases they won’t provide the reason (e.g. if due to concerns over money laundering, suspicious payments etc) so complaint cannot be upheld as FOS won’t have any evidence they have not acted with good reason. However, in the case of the poster above a specific reason HAS been given in terms of abuse of the offer. Thus I think there would be at least some prospect of the FOS saying the bank were not acting correctly if they have specifically confirmed in the phone call that switching multiple accounts is ok and not abuse or against the t and c.
So obviously doesn’t give 100% protection but may be worth considering for some people depending on how they weigh up the risk and rewards of doing multiple switches and referrals.0 -
bristolleedsfan wrote: »If ask and get answer dont like even though isnt a breach of any terms and conditions then have to abide by answer, multiple switches have been paid out for myself and I would have thought many others.
In fact by asking kinda putting across that feel it is as on mind self guilt, bit late for many of us to start asking now .:rotfl: I would suggest say as little as possible during switch phone call. :lipsrseal
More answers might be forthcoming this week with what is paid out ( or not paid out)
Yep I know there is the risk also of being told it’s not in line with, or in the spirit of, the t and c but on the upside it does give some possible fallback if Santander subsequently claims you have abused the system and shut down your banking.
Just putting it out there as one possible approach for those who are wondering whether to risk multiple switches as opposed to those who already have (albeit after reading the poster’s detailed explanation it does seem very unlikely that doing multiple switches into an existing account would cause the problem....as others have pointed out seems more likely due to the high number of new accounts opened and the use of the overdrafts).0 -
In hindsight I agree the overdrafts were likely a red flag. Of course, they didn't have to grant them and could simply have demanded immediate repayment (which I did as soon as I finished the call telling me I was no longer welcome). Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there's anything against using overdrafts in connection with these referrals? I think the overdraft offer is simply for switching regardless of a referral.
Anyway, I was informed that repaying them was of course required (letter I received afterwards actually states 28 days) but would not unblock my accounts. Still not welcome. So I still don't think I broke any rules, but certainly something to avoid (along with opening multiple accounts) to be safe.0 -
gavindoc27 wrote: »In hindsight I agree the overdrafts were likely a red flag. Of course, they didn't have to grant them and could simply have demanded immediate repayment (which I did as soon as I finished the call telling me I was no longer welcome). Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there's anything against using overdrafts in connection with these referrals? I think the overdraft offer is simply for switching regardless of a referral.
Anyway, I was informed that repaying them was of course required (letter I received afterwards actually states 28 days) but would not unblock my accounts. Still not welcome. So I still don't think I broke any rules, but certainly something to avoid (along with opening multiple accounts) to be safe.
Can you post an image of the letter (blanking name and address)?0 -
It looks as though you are conflating non-payment of the vouchers with Santander ending its relationship with you. I was referring only to the latter, and the former is governed entirely by offer T&Cs.True but imo it would give a good basis for a complaint albeit one that may ultimately need to go to the FOS.Firstly, if Santander have explicitly confirmed in the phone call that all is fine then I suspect the outcome of any complaint regarding non payment of the vouchers would be upheld by the FOS.Secondly, I know banks can end their relationship with you as per standard t and c but from what I’ve read they can’t just do so without any good reason. In a lot of cases they won’t provide the reason (e.g. if due to concerns over money laundering, suspicious payments etc) so complaint cannot be upheld as FOS won’t have any evidence they have not acted with good reason. However, in the case of the poster above a specific reason HAS been given in terms of abuse of the offer. Thus I think there would be at least some prospect of the FOS saying the bank were not acting correctly if they have specifically confirmed in the phone call that switching multiple accounts is ok and not abuse or against the t and c.
This is governed by their general T&Cs. The only time you could have grounds for complaint is if your account was closed because of your race, gender, religion, sexuality etc. You would need to have some evidence of this to make a successful complaint and in this situation the bank would need to provide a convincing (but not necessarily just) reason other than unlawful discrimination for the decision.So obviously doesn’t give 100% protection but may be worth considering for some people depending on how they weigh up the risk and rewards of doing multiple switches and referrals.0 -
0800 switching team phone number has absolutely nothing to do with Santander RAF promotion, was in operation before RAF promotion started and will be in operation after RAF promotion has finished. ( not even mentioned on recorded message when says dial 1 for, dial 2 for...)
As masonic says there are two completely different issues.
1. A Bank telling customer(s) ending relationship with you
2. A Bank reneging on an incentive offer when T+C of that incentive offer has not been breached/has been met
Looking at a hypothetical example ( which might be reality for some people), Joe Bloggs has had switching incentive offer paid 5 times for repeat switches which means he hasnt breached/has met the incentive offer T+C, Mr Bloggs therefore arranges another 5 switches.
Bank not happy having to pay out so many times despite not putting limit in offer T+C tells Mr Bloggs no longer welcome as a customer, no more Amazon 50.00 vouchers.
Mr Bloggs accepts relationship with Bank is finished will continue to pursue Bank reneging on incentive offer as Mr Bloggs has done nothing wrong/has met incentive switching offer T+C/Hasnt breached switching incentive offer T+C
If anyone is worried about putting their relationship with the Bank at risk then as in all relationships best not to do anything that might be detrimental to that relationship I would have thought.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 607.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173K Life & Family
- 247.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards