NOW OPEN: the MSE Forum 'Ask An Expert' event. This time we'd like your questions on TRAVEL & HOLIDAY DEALS. Post by Wed and deals expert MSE Oli will answer as many as he can.
I know the rule is 'don't feed the trolls', but is it safe to assume that the new thread on this board is yet more of the same anti renewables arguments ...... the same ole same ole, from the same ole poster.
Unless the title is being deliberately sarcastic, then we have approx 35% RE and 20% nuclear heading for 7% nuclear (closures plus HPC) ........ now my maths ain't great but ........ ?
Mart. Cardiff. 5.58 kWp PV systems (3.58 ESE & 2.0 WNW)
Although this is disappointing, I don't really find it surprising and suspect that all we've seen so far with EVs is an initial show of enthusiasm, and sales will plateau for along time before they become a truly viable proposition for the mainstream.
In the Financial Times over the weekend there were a couple of pieces showing how that is going to turn around completely over the next couple years:
The price of lithium-ion batteries should go down to $100 per kWh in the next year (from $10,000 per kWh in the early 1990s...). The US Department of Energy calculates that once battery costs fall below $125 kWh, owning and operating an electric car will cheaper than a petrol-power car in most parts of the world.
A huge spike of over a hundred new electric models around the world in the next two years. More choice, more competition.
This sudden spike in choice is at least partially down to the EU reducing the average allowable car emissions to 95 grammes of CO2 per kilometre by 2021, with punitive fines for failure. It could cost the industry €30bn in fines. The average figure was 121g of CO2/km in 2018, surprisingly a four year high because the rise in SUVs and falls in diesel. There is potential for electric cars to be sold at a significant loss to offset the emissions of the more profitable gas guzzlers (or they may just stop selling the worst gas guzzlers, it's just too early to say).
It looks like the start of 2021 is the time to plan to buy that first electric car....
In the Financial Times over the weekend there were a couple of pieces showing how that is going turn around completely over the next couple years:
The price of lithium-ion batteries should go down to $100 per kWh in the next year (from $10,000 per kWh in the early 1990s...). The US Department of Energy calculates that once battery costs fall below $125 kWh, owning and operating an electric car will cheaper than a petrol-power car in most parts of the world.
A huge spike of over a hundred new electric models around the world in the next two years. More choice, more competition.
This sudden spike in choice is at least partially down to the EU reducing the average allowable car emissions to 95 grammes of CO2 per kilometre by 2021, with punitive fines for failure. It could cost the industry €30bn in fines. The average figure was 121g of CO2/km in 2018, surprisingly a four year high because the rise in SUVs and falls in diesel. There is potential for electric cars to be sold at a significant loss to offset the emissions of the more profitable gas guzzlers (or they may just stop selling the worst gas guzzlers, it's just too early to say).
It looks like the start of 2021 is the time to plan to buy that first electric car....
The Americans will solve EVs with software, hell software solves gas cars too if EVs dont work
The problem with cars is they are designed for peak needs. Same is true for Vans and HGVs. All becuase humans are expensive drivers
Once self drive software is here, which is likely within 5 years certainly within 10 years then taxi EV fleets will dominate. But instead of something like a tesla model 3 we will have half sized EVs that use half the energy and require half the costly batteries
Imagine a tesla model 3 but cut in half
Instead of 185 cm wide perhaps only 85 cm wide and seats upto 3 passengers. One at the front one in the middle one at the back. No wing mirrors and more aero efficency = 10 miles per kWh
This means instead of needed a 50KWh battery pack you only need a 25KWh battery pack and can have a 250 mile range car
Actually even that is overkill. Just have a 10 kWh battery pack so the car only has 100 mile range but that is no problem for a self drive EV it just goes and recharges at a supercharger whenever needed
Imagine a robo taxi EV in London.
Each trip is perhaps average 6 miles.
It can do 10 trips so 60 miles which is easy on its 100 mile range battery
Then go supercharge for 20 mins and out again to serve 10 customer trips
Then repeat
Easy
The advantage to these half sized robo EVs is significantly less electricity needed (10 miles per kWh rather than 4.5) and significant smaller battery packs (10KWh rather than 50kWh) which means a 80% reduction in batteries thus a 80% reduction in battery pack costs.
If you need a robo taxi for a longer trip, say London to Edinburgh which is 400 miles the fleet would send you a long range model. Say one with a 50KWh battery and 500 mile range. Said 3 person vehicle could also pick up two other passengers in London that want to go to Edimburgh meaning only 40KWh of energy to transport 3 people 400 miles. Very energy efficient!
Battery factory limits also go away
A giga factory able to churn out 50GWh a year is capable of supplying 1 million current long range EVs with 50KWh packs. The same 50GWh a year giga factory can supply 5 million robo EV fleet taxis with 10KWh batteries and each robo EV can displace probably 5x the mileage of private owned EV mileage
so one giga factory able to churn out 50GWh of batteries to produce 1 million human driven EVs displacing 10,000 each in oil miles becomes the same 50GWh batt factory but able to produce 5 million robo EVs capable of displacing 50,000 miles each = a factor of 25 x difference
So if you need 25 giga factories for human driven EVs, you only need 1 giga factory for the equivalent mileage to be covered by self drive robo EVs
This is a huge difference and means robo self drive EVs can very rapidly displace human driven oil cars
One giga factory with capacity to produce 50GWh/yr is able to displace 25 million vehicles worth of mileage
The world would only need just 10 such giga factories to allow 100% switch to electrify transport
It also means car manufacturing can go from ~100 million cars per year towards 20 million robo EV taxis per year but with average mileage per year of the cars going up 5x
In the Financial Times over the weekend there were a couple of pieces showing how that is going turn around completely over the next couple years:
The price of lithium-ion batteries should go down to $100 per kWh in the next year (from $10,000 per kWh in the early 1990s...). The US Department of Energy calculates that once battery costs fall below $125 kWh, owning and operating an electric car will cheaper than a petrol-power car in most parts of the world.
A huge spike of over a hundred new electric models around the world in the next two years. More choice, more competition.
This sudden spike in choice is at least partially down to the EU reducing the average allowable car emissions to 95 grammes of CO2 per kilometre by 2021, with punitive fines for failure. It could cost the industry €30bn in fines. The average figure was 121g of CO2/km in 2018, surprisingly a four year high because the rise in SUVs and falls in diesel. There is potential for electric cars to be sold at a significant loss to offset the emissions of the more profitable gas guzzlers (or they may just stop selling the worst gas guzzlers, it's just too early to say).
It looks like the start of 2021 is the time to plan to buy that first electric car....
We dont need cheaper batts we need self drive software
As soon as self drive software arrives, 100 mile range 10KWh battery pack half sized EVs able to do 10 miles per kWh will become very economical very economical
1/5th the battery cells/packs of a model 3
The biggest cost reduced by 80%
100 miles self drive fleet EV taxis will be economical because the average trip is only about 8 miles. Such a taxi can serve 10 customer trips then supercharge for 20 mins and off it goes again to serve 10 customers and supercharge in 20 mins again and it keeps doing this over and over. In a busy city like London it might work 24 hours a day like this doing 100,000 miles per year displacing 100,000 oil miles and only costing 10,000 kWh of electricity.
There is no need for these half sized 3 seat EVs to be more than 100 mile range
There can be a small number of long range versions say 20kWh battery 200 mile range.
So if you want to do London to Birmingham which is 120 miles it can collect you and two other passengers doing the same route (or almost the same) and go do that at 80mph getting you there in 1.5 hours
Self drive software makes EVs much more competitive than current oil cars
I imagine these half sized self drive EVs will cost less than $20,000 seeing as its just a model 3 cut in half it should cost about half what a model 3 mosts (maybe less since the battery of two of these would be 2 x 10kWh which is still 60% smaller than the 50 kWh of a standard $40,000 model 3)
50KWh model 3 pack weighs 480kg
10kWh pack could save 384kg and cost 80% less
Such a car could be about 700-800kg
I know the rule is 'don't feed the trolls', but is it safe to assume that the new thread on this board is yet more of the same anti renewables arguments ...... the same ole same ole, from the same ole poster.
Unless the title is being deliberately sarcastic, then we have approx 35% RE and 20% nuclear heading for 7% nuclear (closures plus HPC) ........ now my maths ain't great but ........ ?
He seems to be making the argument that in 2027 the UK grid will roughly be
~18% domestic nuclear
~25% imports
~28% offshore wind power (24GW @ average 45% CF by 2030)
~9% onshore wind power
~3% PV
~2% UK hydro
~15% combination of Biomass and Natural Gas
That we do not need to build more mass nuclear or pv or onshore wind becuase what is under construction and committed to (30GW offshore wind) already decarbs the UK grid. Doing more doesn't decarb much further and mostly ends up curtailing other non fossil fuels or itself.
He sounds like he knows what he is talking about
plus his math is great
The price of lithium-ion batteries should go down to $100 per kWh in the next year (from $10,000 per kWh in the early 1990s...). The US Department of Energy calculates that once battery costs fall below $125 kWh, owning and operating an electric car will cheaper than a petrol-power car in most parts of the world.
Looks like BEV's are cheaper already in terms of TCO (total cost of ownership) but depends on mileage. But regartding your point about batt prices, you might enjoy the first 5mins of this discussion:
The introduction of a 2% BIK rate in April 2020 could change the company car landscape. It's possible that many private buyers with a company car allowance will decide to have a company BEV instead from next April. It's also possible that this is what is causing any current dip in sales.
Gosh. It's now even better....
For cars registered from 6th April 2020 the benefit in kind for electric cars and hybrid cars with an electric range of 130 miles goes down to..... zero.
My company car is due for replacement at the end of the year.
I currently dont use it privately because of the tax being over 3k a year.
Tesla model 3 sounds good to me
West central Scotland 4kw sse since 2014 and 6.6kw wsw / ene split since 2019 24kwh leaf, 75Kwh Tesla and Lux 3600 with 20Kwh useable storage
For cars registered from 6th April 2020 the benefit in kind for electric cars and hybrid cars with an electric range of 130 miles goes down to..... zero.
The most reassuring thing is that the government is giving guidance on BEV BIK rates going forward.
It's inevitable the BIK rates will rise as the transition to BEVs takes place, but businesses need to know that they're not going to be faced with a jump from 2% to 35% in one year. That would result in business users jumping out of the company car scheme & taking the cash alternative instead...leaving the business with a redundant vehicle for the balance of the contract.
Replies
Unless the title is being deliberately sarcastic, then we have approx 35% RE and 20% nuclear heading for 7% nuclear (closures plus HPC) ........ now my maths ain't great but ........ ?
For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
Window film has potential to even out solar heating
For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
In the Financial Times over the weekend there were a couple of pieces showing how that is going to turn around completely over the next couple years:
The price of lithium-ion batteries should go down to $100 per kWh in the next year (from $10,000 per kWh in the early 1990s...). The US Department of Energy calculates that once battery costs fall below $125 kWh, owning and operating an electric car will cheaper than a petrol-power car in most parts of the world.
A huge spike of over a hundred new electric models around the world in the next two years. More choice, more competition.
This sudden spike in choice is at least partially down to the EU reducing the average allowable car emissions to 95 grammes of CO2 per kilometre by 2021, with punitive fines for failure. It could cost the industry €30bn in fines. The average figure was 121g of CO2/km in 2018, surprisingly a four year high because the rise in SUVs and falls in diesel. There is potential for electric cars to be sold at a significant loss to offset the emissions of the more profitable gas guzzlers (or they may just stop selling the worst gas guzzlers, it's just too early to say).
It looks like the start of 2021 is the time to plan to buy that first electric car....
The Americans will solve EVs with software, hell software solves gas cars too if EVs dont work
The problem with cars is they are designed for peak needs. Same is true for Vans and HGVs. All becuase humans are expensive drivers
Once self drive software is here, which is likely within 5 years certainly within 10 years then taxi EV fleets will dominate. But instead of something like a tesla model 3 we will have half sized EVs that use half the energy and require half the costly batteries
Imagine a tesla model 3 but cut in half
Instead of 185 cm wide perhaps only 85 cm wide and seats upto 3 passengers. One at the front one in the middle one at the back. No wing mirrors and more aero efficency = 10 miles per kWh
This means instead of needed a 50KWh battery pack you only need a 25KWh battery pack and can have a 250 mile range car
Actually even that is overkill. Just have a 10 kWh battery pack so the car only has 100 mile range but that is no problem for a self drive EV it just goes and recharges at a supercharger whenever needed
Imagine a robo taxi EV in London.
Each trip is perhaps average 6 miles.
It can do 10 trips so 60 miles which is easy on its 100 mile range battery
Then go supercharge for 20 mins and out again to serve 10 customer trips
Then repeat
Easy
The advantage to these half sized robo EVs is significantly less electricity needed (10 miles per kWh rather than 4.5) and significant smaller battery packs (10KWh rather than 50kWh) which means a 80% reduction in batteries thus a 80% reduction in battery pack costs.
If you need a robo taxi for a longer trip, say London to Edinburgh which is 400 miles the fleet would send you a long range model. Say one with a 50KWh battery and 500 mile range. Said 3 person vehicle could also pick up two other passengers in London that want to go to Edimburgh meaning only 40KWh of energy to transport 3 people 400 miles. Very energy efficient!
Battery factory limits also go away
A giga factory able to churn out 50GWh a year is capable of supplying 1 million current long range EVs with 50KWh packs. The same 50GWh a year giga factory can supply 5 million robo EV fleet taxis with 10KWh batteries and each robo EV can displace probably 5x the mileage of private owned EV mileage
so one giga factory able to churn out 50GWh of batteries to produce 1 million human driven EVs displacing 10,000 each in oil miles becomes the same 50GWh batt factory but able to produce 5 million robo EVs capable of displacing 50,000 miles each = a factor of 25 x difference
So if you need 25 giga factories for human driven EVs, you only need 1 giga factory for the equivalent mileage to be covered by self drive robo EVs
This is a huge difference and means robo self drive EVs can very rapidly displace human driven oil cars
One giga factory with capacity to produce 50GWh/yr is able to displace 25 million vehicles worth of mileage
The world would only need just 10 such giga factories to allow 100% switch to electrify transport
It also means car manufacturing can go from ~100 million cars per year towards 20 million robo EV taxis per year but with average mileage per year of the cars going up 5x
We dont need cheaper batts we need self drive software
As soon as self drive software arrives, 100 mile range 10KWh battery pack half sized EVs able to do 10 miles per kWh will become very economical very economical
1/5th the battery cells/packs of a model 3
The biggest cost reduced by 80%
100 miles self drive fleet EV taxis will be economical because the average trip is only about 8 miles. Such a taxi can serve 10 customer trips then supercharge for 20 mins and off it goes again to serve 10 customers and supercharge in 20 mins again and it keeps doing this over and over. In a busy city like London it might work 24 hours a day like this doing 100,000 miles per year displacing 100,000 oil miles and only costing 10,000 kWh of electricity.
There is no need for these half sized 3 seat EVs to be more than 100 mile range
There can be a small number of long range versions say 20kWh battery 200 mile range.
So if you want to do London to Birmingham which is 120 miles it can collect you and two other passengers doing the same route (or almost the same) and go do that at 80mph getting you there in 1.5 hours
Self drive software makes EVs much more competitive than current oil cars
I imagine these half sized self drive EVs will cost less than $20,000 seeing as its just a model 3 cut in half it should cost about half what a model 3 mosts (maybe less since the battery of two of these would be 2 x 10kWh which is still 60% smaller than the 50 kWh of a standard $40,000 model 3)
50KWh model 3 pack weighs 480kg
10kWh pack could save 384kg and cost 80% less
Such a car could be about 700-800kg
He seems to be making the argument that in 2027 the UK grid will roughly be
~18% domestic nuclear
~25% imports
~28% offshore wind power (24GW @ average 45% CF by 2030)
~9% onshore wind power
~3% PV
~2% UK hydro
~15% combination of Biomass and Natural Gas
That we do not need to build more mass nuclear or pv or onshore wind becuase what is under construction and committed to (30GW offshore wind) already decarbs the UK grid. Doing more doesn't decarb much further and mostly ends up curtailing other non fossil fuels or itself.
He sounds like he knows what he is talking about
plus his math is great
Looks like BEV's are cheaper already in terms of TCO (total cost of ownership) but depends on mileage. But regartding your point about batt prices, you might enjoy the first 5mins of this discussion:
Tesla & The REVolution w/ Sam Korus
It explains that with each doubling of production volume for li-ion batts the costs fall 18%, which is pretty nice.
For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
Gosh. It's now even better....
For cars registered from 6th April 2020 the benefit in kind for electric cars and hybrid cars with an electric range of 130 miles goes down to..... zero.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-wltp-and-vehicle-taxes
My company car is due for replacement at the end of the year.
I currently dont use it privately because of the tax being over 3k a year.
Tesla model 3 sounds good to me
4kw sse since 2014 and 6.6kw wsw / ene split since 2019
24kwh leaf, 75Kwh Tesla and Lux 3600 with 20Kwh useable storage
It's inevitable the BIK rates will rise as the transition to BEVs takes place, but businesses need to know that they're not going to be faced with a jump from 2% to 35% in one year. That would result in business users jumping out of the company car scheme & taking the cash alternative instead...leaving the business with a redundant vehicle for the balance of the contract.