Coupon-mad wrote: »
stick to a decent defence and stick around, come back at WS and evidence stage.
Ezisola wrote: »
I intend to, right pain seeing the threads go all the way to court and never report back!
Do you think my defence posted on the previous page is about ready to go?
bargepole wrote: »
Here is my suggested alternative:
nosferatu1001 wrote: »
1) Yes, just add a single line that no LBA was received, in breach of the PAP for debt claims
2) Yes, put them to proof that the permit was not displayed. It would help if their pictures are terrible or obv taken from an angle to obscure the permits position
3) yes of course. There was no breach by the defendants vehicle because signage makes no requirement to display a permit.
4) You state the claimants added "legal representative" costs are not permissible under CPR27
How to make yours spendable again
Lower your band & save £1,000s
Including year's 2for1 movies for £1