IMPORTANT REMINDER: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information. If you are uploading images, please take extra care that you have redacted all personal information.
MSE's 2011 Petrol/Diesel Cost Diet Challenge: Put your money where your pedal is!
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides
'Is buying a flat above a shop worth it in a good location?'
A user ponders a property purchase
Join the Forum discussion
Replies
co2 g/km is an important consideration for the cars we are going to contract hire for the wifes company, I was looking with interest at the Fiat 500 twin air, but then noticed that the Clio DCi 86bhp is available in a new eco2 model that gives about 65mpg urban and nigh on 80 extra urban.
The wife has an older 56 plate model of the same car and gets 60mpg on average.
As soon as I discovered this new eco2 Clio the Fiat 500 and the SMart ForTwo is not even an option.
I can see the point, and a colleague at work has one for the same reason you do.
But if I can get a full size five door car, with decent performance and 5* NCAP for around £12k and free Congestion Charge and Road Tax then I am sold.
They are a nice car to drive aswell, and better built than Renaults of old if i'm honest.
Though ours and the eco2 model I am talking about don't have lots of gizmos to go wrong.
Think you may be on the wrong forum.
And the fact that you have a fuel card by definition means you probably can't afford fuel either.;)
There’s a regular journey I make which is 58 miles (round trip) and I put this into Google map, making sure I specified the route I actually drive which avoids both a city centre and a ring-road which can both get snarled up. I clicked the estimated fuel cost at the bottom of the driving directions and input £1.37 (I paid 136.9 at Asda). This updated the estimated fuel cost for my trip to £12.06. But using my 14p per mile calculation, I make it £8.21. This seems a hell of a difference! A few possibilities occur to me:
- Google’s estimated fuel cost is probably based on petrol, whereas I’m using diesel. Diesel may be more economical per mile, but surely not nearly 50% more economical. Or is it? Bearing in mind it’s 7p/litre more expensive (at least at my local Asda.)
- I drive as economically as I can. The boot just has a few reusable carrier-bags, I keep my tyres pumped up and I rarely accelerate or break hard, allowing momentum to carry me with my revs as low as possible. I’m not crawling though. I usually make the trip in about 40mins each way, so I’m averaging 43/44 mph, not bad when there are two towns involved. But my Vectra is probably both slightly larger and slightly older than the average car out there, so again I’d be surprised if I was managing anywhere near a 50% saving.
- I’ve screwed up my calculation somewhere.
- Google have screwed theirs up.
Has anyone else worked out their fuel cost per mile and compared it with Google’s estimate?But your saving is nothing compared to these lucky sods
Jammy, eh?
I reckon it'll take me 18 months to recoup the money I spent on the Citroen in terms of fuel savings, but I also save on tax and insurance too and as the car is 5 years younger than my Merc and has done only 20,000 as opposed to 120,000 I'm hoping maintenance costs will also be lower. That said, the Merc never needed more than a service. It never broke down or anything.