PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Ex tenant taking me, the landlord, to court
Comments
-
elsien said:Jude57 said:If OP is concerned, they should contact Police themselves to find out whether any complaint of theft has actually been made and if it has, arrange to attend for interview under caution - either with their own solicitor or requiring the Duty Solicitor to accompany them. Under no circumstances should they agree to any kind of formal interview without a solicitor present. From what the OP has written, it's very unlikely the tenant has even made a complaint to Police but on the slim chance she actually has, OP showing themselves to be cooperative and willing to assist Police enquires will, unless the OP has a long and colourful criminal record, is likely to incline Police officers to consider who, on the evidence and balance of probabilities, is telling the truth of the matter. In the unlikely event that Police believe the tenant, putting the OP's evidence to the Magistrates should result in the case being dismissed because Magistrates are not, in my experience, fools.
Even if Police aren't involved, let's assume for the sake of argument that the tenant takes out a private prosecution for the theft of the alleged jewellery. She'll have to explain to the Judge why she took all the heavy, cumbersome furniture (and white goods?), all her clothing, household goods and linens, all her pictures, ornaments and worthless tchotchkes but left behind a small (assuming we're not talking pirate chest size jewellery case) easily transportable box containing the Koh i Noor and the lost treasure of Atlantis. Judges aren't generally stupid and in small claims cases, they tend to take a pragmatic view but they do not like claimants lying or inflating their claimed losses for a bigger pay out. There are severe consequences for perjury, even in a Small Claims case.
P.S. Off topic but I hope the legendary Gitdog is still running rings around you and every human!1 -
Marvel1 said:barrydh said:I understand about us entering the property without her permission but she refused to reply to letters sent requsting her attendance but we had no reply. She blocked my phone number in May 2022 and the agent from about 6 months ago. How were we to get her permission?
Thst means she is still liable for council tax and rent even right now?1 -
Jude57 said:elsien said:Jude57 said:If OP is concerned, they should contact Police themselves to find out whether any complaint of theft has actually been made and if it has, arrange to attend for interview under caution - either with their own solicitor or requiring the Duty Solicitor to accompany them. Under no circumstances should they agree to any kind of formal interview without a solicitor present. From what the OP has written, it's very unlikely the tenant has even made a complaint to Police but on the slim chance she actually has, OP showing themselves to be cooperative and willing to assist Police enquires will, unless the OP has a long and colourful criminal record, is likely to incline Police officers to consider who, on the evidence and balance of probabilities, is telling the truth of the matter. In the unlikely event that Police believe the tenant, putting the OP's evidence to the Magistrates should result in the case being dismissed because Magistrates are not, in my experience, fools.
Even if Police aren't involved, let's assume for the sake of argument that the tenant takes out a private prosecution for the theft of the alleged jewellery. She'll have to explain to the Judge why she took all the heavy, cumbersome furniture (and white goods?), all her clothing, household goods and linens, all her pictures, ornaments and worthless tchotchkes but left behind a small (assuming we're not talking pirate chest size jewellery case) easily transportable box containing the Koh i Noor and the lost treasure of Atlantis. Judges aren't generally stupid and in small claims cases, they tend to take a pragmatic view but they do not like claimants lying or inflating their claimed losses for a bigger pay out. There are severe consequences for perjury, even in a Small Claims case.
P.S. Off topic but I hope the legendary Gitdog is still running rings around you and every human!All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.4K Spending & Discounts
- 240.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.6K Life & Family
- 254K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards