We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Carer's Allowance query
Muttleythefrog
Posts: 20,080 Forumite
I was in the process of putting in my wife's claim for Carer's Allowance. It won't benefit us financially at the moment as it will of course be pound for pound deducted from Universal Credit. Our claim for U/C though we expect to end in coming months due to inheritance.
During the application process it enquires about holidays from caring over the last 26 weeks. I had assumed a claim from present date would not have restrictions on 'holidays' preceding it.
Can it be confirmed that entitlement to a new claim would be affected by holidays >4 weeks in previous 26 weeks? (Wife has just come back from 8 weeks abroad and has spent another period abroad in last few months).
Regards!
During the application process it enquires about holidays from caring over the last 26 weeks. I had assumed a claim from present date would not have restrictions on 'holidays' preceding it.
Can it be confirmed that entitlement to a new claim would be affected by holidays >4 weeks in previous 26 weeks? (Wife has just come back from 8 weeks abroad and has spent another period abroad in last few months).
Regards!
"Do not attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by incompetence" - rogerblack
0
Comments
-
I would imagine it asks so it covers backdated claims. Whereas if your claim is only starting now, it should be irrelevant as it's paid in arrears.
The official guidance is at DMG Chapter 60, if that's any help.3 -
Spoonie_Turtle said:I would imagine it asks so it covers backdated claims. Whereas if your claim is only starting now, it should be irrelevant as it's paid in arrears.
The official guidance is at DMG Chapter 60, if that's any help."Do not attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by incompetence" - rogerblack0 -
I see what you're saying, but
"60037 It is not essential for claimants to show that at the date of claim they have already been regularly engaged in caring for a severely disabled person. An intention to care for a severely disabled person should be taken into account in deciding if the condition at DMG 60035 is satisfied."
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65733b9b33b7f20012b72163/dmg-vol10-ch60.pdf
Reading through the guidance it seems quite clear people only need to meet the conditions for the benefit once claiming it.2 -
Spoonie_Turtle said:I see what you're saying, but
"60037 It is not essential for claimants to show that at the date of claim they have already been regularly engaged in caring for a severely disabled person. An intention to care for a severely disabled person should be taken into account in deciding if the condition at DMG 60035 is satisfied."
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65733b9b33b7f20012b72163/dmg-vol10-ch60.pdf
Reading through the guidance it seems quite clear people only need to meet the conditions for the benefit once claiming it."Do not attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by incompetence" - rogerblack0 -
Having read though the guidance I totally agree with Spoonie past is irreverent unless trying to be backdated.
Let's Be Careful Out There1 -
HillStreetBlues said:Having read though the guidance I totally agree with Spoonie past is irreverent unless trying to be backdated."Do not attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by incompetence" - rogerblack0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 347.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 251.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.1K Spending & Discounts
- 240.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 616.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.3K Life & Family
- 253.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards