PCM UK PCN


I made reps stating that I was the hirer, no admission would be made as to who was driving, challenging their authority to act and requesting all future correspondence to my (provided) home address.
I have received the following response: https://flic.kr/p/2oWja1J
How should I respond to this? It appears that, despite the letter stating I have14 days to respond, PCM have gone to the DVLA and begun making contact with my lease company.
Comments
-
It looks like it is a hire/lease car with a windscreen ticket (NtO) and therefore you cannot appeal "on behalf of", you need to get a Notice to Hirer in your own name. When you read the NEWBIE sticky all about hire cars what did it suggest you do?1
-
This the advice I thought I was following from the newbie thread:
In the case of a company car or hire car, if you get a windscreen ticket and cannot get it cancelled by the landowner (PLAN A above), appeal within the first 2 weeks, well before day 21. This is in order to hook the PPC in your direction, before they get a chance to get the keeper's details from the DVLA.
Am I now waiting for the Notice to Hirer to come?0 -
Hello,
I received this claim letter from the county court for a parking incident that occurred in August last year. I have read the newbies thread and so far I have:
I) Completed the AOS 24/07/23
II) Sent a letter to GS seeking debt advice
III) Requested and received SAR from PCM UK
IV) Downloaded the August 2023 defence template
I am in the process of putting together my defence. I have copied and pasted the new August 2023 defence template and I am currently working on the body of my defence (#3).
From the SAR information sent by PCM UK I can see that the times between the photos taken of my parked vehicle is 1 minute.
Consequently I am planning to use three main angels as the main basis of my defence.
1. The legal requirement of Grace period in the IPC code of practice which PCM UK are a member of
2. Granted permission by the legal tenant to park in allocated bay as a visitor to the property (Jopson v Home Guard (appeal) and PACE v Mr N)
3. Confusing and deliberately signage - it is not apparent where permits can be obtained and where visitors can park within the housing complex.
Is it possible to provide links to the Jopson v Home Guard (appeal) and PACE v Mr N etc as this case is about incurring the PCN whilst parked as a visitor in a residential space where the tenant/leaseholder has already been granted the right to park or unload.
Additionally anyways I can apply this to my defence or anything else I can include in it will be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks
0 -
@Cabbage_Patch1, please stop posting irrelevant information on other people's threads.
I realise you are new here but it can only lead to confusion when trying to deal with two different issues in a single thread.
Please can I suggest you start a new thread where you will get all the help you need.
Please do that very soon as it looks like you are running out of time.2 -
Thank you. I will do.0
-
@KeithP I have created a new thread as you have suggested. Any help from you in regards to my case will be very much appreciated.
Many thanks0 -
F_CST said:This the advice I thought I was following from the newbie thread:
In the case of a company car or hire car, if you get a windscreen ticket and cannot get it cancelled by the landowner (PLAN A above), appeal within the first 2 weeks, well before day 21. This is in order to hook the PPC in your direction, before they get a chance to get the keeper's details from the DVLA.
Am I now waiting for the Notice to Hirer to come?
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 338.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 248.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 447.6K Spending & Discounts
- 230.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 171.1K Life & Family
- 244.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards