NOW OPEN: the MSE Forum 'Ask An Expert' event. This time we'd like your questions on TRAVEL & HOLIDAY DEALS. Post by Wed and deals expert MSE Oli will answer as many as he can.

NS&I to increase the Premium Bond prize rate AGAIN to 3.3% – here's all you need to know

MSE_Chris_OMSE_Chris_O MSE Staff
41 Posts
First Anniversary
MSE Staff
NS&I will increase its Premium Bond prize-fund rate to 3.3% from 3.15% for its March 2023 draw and beyond, with an extra £15 million in higher-value prizes up for grabs. The odds of winning will remain the same at 24,000-to-one, but there will more prizes between £50 and £100,000 available.

Read the full story here:

NS&I to increase the Premium Bond prize rate AGAIN to 3.3% – here's all you need to know

If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.

Replies

  • edited 15 February at 7:28AM
    chucknorrischucknorris Forumite
    10.8K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 15 February at 7:28AM
    webwiz said:
    I think that the best way to think of PBs is that if you have a large holding you are buying two different parts. One part, 20p of each bond,is a lottery ticket which might win you up to a million, but probably won't. The other part, 80p of each bond will on average get a return of 3.3% from prizes of £100 and below. So if you don't win a big prize your return will average 2.64% on the full cost of the bond. As it's tax free this is quite competitive for those who have maxed out their personal savings allowance especially if they are higher rate payers. If you only have a small holding you should regard the bonds as buying raffle tickets with the potential interest foregone
    That is a good way of looking at it, and it is certainly the way that I look at it, being a high rate tax payer it is a competitive return, and I am also on the fringe of the 60% tax band, so potentially an even better return in the future.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • sgogsgog Forumite
    54 Posts
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    webwiz said:
    I think that the best way to think of PBs is that if you have a large holding you are buying two different parts. One part, 20p of each bond,is a lottery ticket which might win you up to a million, but probably won't. The other part, 80p of each bond will on average get a return of 3.3% from prizes of £100 and below. So if you don't win a big prize your return will average 2.64% on the full cost of the bond. As it's tax free this is quite competitive for those who have maxed out their personal savings allowance especially if they are higher rate payers. If you only have a small holding you should regard the bonds as buying raffle tickets with the potential interest foregone
    Isn't it sad that the government is sponsoring a lottery without offering an equivalent luck-free tax-free alternative  :/
    I mean, it costs the taxpayer 3.3%, and most people earn 2.64% to subsidize this crazy lottery.
  • EthicsGradientEthicsGradient Forumite
    580 Posts
    500 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    English government lotteries to raise finance are as old as the Bank of England - 1694:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Million_Lottery
  • sgogsgog Forumite
    54 Posts
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    English government lotteries to raise finance are as old as the Bank of England - 1694:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Million_Lottery
    "Tradition is a guide and not a jailer."
    W. Somerset Maugham
  • AlbermarleAlbermarle Forumite
    17.4K Posts
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    sgog said:
    webwiz said:
    I think that the best way to think of PBs is that if you have a large holding you are buying two different parts. One part, 20p of each bond,is a lottery ticket which might win you up to a million, but probably won't. The other part, 80p of each bond will on average get a return of 3.3% from prizes of £100 and below. So if you don't win a big prize your return will average 2.64% on the full cost of the bond. As it's tax free this is quite competitive for those who have maxed out their personal savings allowance especially if they are higher rate payers. If you only have a small holding you should regard the bonds as buying raffle tickets with the potential interest foregone
    Isn't it sad that the government is sponsoring a lottery without offering an equivalent luck-free tax-free alternative  :/
    I mean, it costs the taxpayer 3.3%, and most people earn 2.64% to subsidize this crazy lottery.
    The bit you are missing is that many people actually like PB's as it is a bit of fun for them, waiting to see what prizes they have won. Many will probably keener to save more in PB's than in a  normal savings account.
    It is not rationally logical, but human beings are a mixture of rationale and emotion.
    Getting rid of PB' s would be unpopular.
  • StargunnerStargunner Forumite
    339 Posts
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    sgog said:
    webwiz said:
    I think that the best way to think of PBs is that if you have a large holding you are buying two different parts. One part, 20p of each bond,is a lottery ticket which might win you up to a million, but probably won't. The other part, 80p of each bond will on average get a return of 3.3% from prizes of £100 and below. So if you don't win a big prize your return will average 2.64% on the full cost of the bond. As it's tax free this is quite competitive for those who have maxed out their personal savings allowance especially if they are higher rate payers. If you only have a small holding you should regard the bonds as buying raffle tickets with the potential interest foregone
    Isn't it sad that the government is sponsoring a lottery without offering an equivalent luck-free tax-free alternative  :/
    I mean, it costs the taxpayer 3.3%, and most people earn 2.64% to subsidize this crazy lottery.
    The bit you are missing is that many people actually like PB's as it is a bit of fun for them, waiting to see what prizes they have won. Many will probably keener to save more in PB's than in a  normal savings account.
    It is not rationally logical, but human beings are a mixture of rationale and emotion.
    Getting rid of PB' s would be unpopular.
    I totally agree. The wife and I enjoy checking the app every month and seeing which one of us has done best that month. Unfortunately she seems to have the most luck 😂. Even if you don’t win anything in a month, unlike the lottery, you have not lost the cost of your tickets.
  • edited 15 February at 12:31PM
    sgogsgog Forumite
    54 Posts
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 15 February at 12:31PM
    sgog said:
    webwiz said:
    I think that the best way to think of PBs is that if you have a large holding you are buying two different parts. One part, 20p of each bond,is a lottery ticket which might win you up to a million, but probably won't. The other part, 80p of each bond will on average get a return of 3.3% from prizes of £100 and below. So if you don't win a big prize your return will average 2.64% on the full cost of the bond. As it's tax free this is quite competitive for those who have maxed out their personal savings allowance especially if they are higher rate payers. If you only have a small holding you should regard the bonds as buying raffle tickets with the potential interest foregone
    Isn't it sad that the government is sponsoring a lottery without offering an equivalent luck-free tax-free alternative  :/
    I mean, it costs the taxpayer 3.3%, and most people earn 2.64% to subsidize this crazy lottery.
    The bit you are missing is that many people actually like PB's as it is a bit of fun for them, waiting to see what prizes they have won. Many will probably keener to save more in PB's than in a  normal savings account.
    It is not rationally logical, but human beings are a mixture of rationale and emotion.
    Getting rid of PB' s would be unpopular.
    I am not "against" having PB in their current form, as much as I'd like to see an equivalent luck-free tax-free similar yield bond.
    In some sense, the government is telling us: if you want to exceed your savings allowance without taxation, you must participate in our lottery.
  • StargunnerStargunner Forumite
    339 Posts
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    sgog said:
    sgog said:
    webwiz said:
    I think that the best way to think of PBs is that if you have a large holding you are buying two different parts. One part, 20p of each bond,is a lottery ticket which might win you up to a million, but probably won't. The other part, 80p of each bond will on average get a return of 3.3% from prizes of £100 and below. So if you don't win a big prize your return will average 2.64% on the full cost of the bond. As it's tax free this is quite competitive for those who have maxed out their personal savings allowance especially if they are higher rate payers. If you only have a small holding you should regard the bonds as buying raffle tickets with the potential interest foregone
    Isn't it sad that the government is sponsoring a lottery without offering an equivalent luck-free tax-free alternative  :/
    I mean, it costs the taxpayer 3.3%, and most people earn 2.64% to subsidize this crazy lottery.
    The bit you are missing is that many people actually like PB's as it is a bit of fun for them, waiting to see what prizes they have won. Many will probably keener to save more in PB's than in a  normal savings account.
    It is not rationally logical, but human beings are a mixture of rationale and emotion.
    Getting rid of PB' s would be unpopular.
    I am not "against" having PB in their current form, as much as I'd like to see an equivalent luck-free tax-free similar yield bond.
    In some sense, the government is telling us: if you want to exceed your savings allowance without taxation, you must participate in our lottery.
    You can use ISA’s to protect your savings from tax 
Sign In or Register to comment.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Energy Price Cap change

Martin Lewis on what it means for you

MSE News

Best £1 you've ever spent?

Share your most impressive bargains

MSE Forum