Parking Eye Question.... 13 February at 9:58AM edited 13 February at 9:58AM in Parking tickets, fines & parking 4 replies 85 views

Grizebeck

Does anyone know why Parking Eye only litigate for single tickets.  I have never seen a multiple Parking Eye ticket case.  I know of nurses in some hospitals who get tickets on every shift (another story...) but never has a multiple claim form been received.  The LOC only ever refers to one ticket and the court claim that follows is for the one incident even when multiple tickets at the same car park etc

Is there a business case for this kind of behaviour?

Coupon-mad

I agree it's very rare but I've seen at least one with more than one PCN.  Saw one with 3 x £100 on it but you are right, the norm is one single PCN claim.

They've never noticeably issued multiple claims either, like the roboclaim lot do.  Unless you know differently?

Grizebeck

Coupon-mad said:

I agree it's very rare but I've seen at least one with more than one PCN.  Saw one with 3 x £100 on it but you are right, the norm is one single PCN claim.

They've never noticeably issued multiple claims either, like the roboclaim lot do.  Unless you know differently?

No ive not see them act like that either.  I am intrigued by the reasoning for single claims

Coupon-mad

With hospital car parks you can guess it's to avoid terrible publicity, like in the Indigo UHW nurses' case.  PE want to protect & retain their hospital car park contracts.

Right now no PPC wants media attention!

Grizebeck

This model of operating seems to have been in play since Parking Eye started doing court.
I wonder if its a systemt/automation issue