Fairness between Children

6.6K Posts


I have 2 children, the eldest was given money at birth. Old uncle, grandparents etc Even by the Government (CTF). The second child not so much. The last 2 years I have been levelling up. So today the eldest has £3075 the youngest £2590 I put £100 per month into the youngest account. Both are invested in VG ESG Dev World All Cap in JISA’s. There’s a 4 year age gap. I will stop the £100 when they are of “equal” value. But what is equal value?
The aim is not that they receive the same at 18 (the younger would loose due to inflation, given equal investment performance). But that they have equal chance of receiving the same.
I can’t use the total invested originally for child 1 because a. I don’t really know how much it was and b. Child 2 didn’t have the benefit of 7 years of growth before I started the £100 a month.
I can’t use the total invested originally for child 1 because a. I don’t really know how much it was and b. Child 2 didn’t have the benefit of 7 years of growth before I started the £100 a month.
If we divide the investments by their ages the eldest (13) has £236 per year the youngest (9) £287. So the younger is winning?
If we say average growth is 5% Going forward the eldest gets £3925 the younger £4018. At 18.
How would you sort this?
If we say average growth is 5% Going forward the eldest gets £3925 the younger £4018. At 18.
How would you sort this?
Once they are even the £100 is going back to my Salary Sacrifice pension where is worth £147 straight away.
0
Latest MSE News and Guides
Replies
I have 2 sons 8 years between them 4 grandkids 12 14 15 and 22 years old
I worked out how long my savings would keep me and decided I had a bit too much and didn't need it all so I gave each of them £10,000 Christmas 21
They are happy and so am I
Or do they just see £4000 ? Would they see anything else as "unfair"?
At least you're trying to be fair.
Rather than this degree of analysis of their JISA amounts it'd probably be better to be focused on them growing up to be well rounded individuals who are not so self entitled that they analyse their JISA and conclude they have been hard done by and financially mistreated by their family.
There is a risk that the example you're setting by this level of 'fairness' is in fact drifting into being a role model that contributes to creating self entitlement and dissatisfaction.
Contributions to the JISA should ideally be any surplus left after your own pension payments. You shouldn't be 'levelling up' children's savings at the expense of your own financial security.
Unfortunately even if they were born 1 year apart and you had contributed exactly the same amount to the penny into each of their S&S ISA's - there's still the potential that the last year for the last child is a disaster.
I don't know how I could reasonably sit my 18 year old child down and say "Right timmy, as you may know, I gave your brother the money from his investments on his 18th birthday last year and obviously he was ecstatic to use the £20ish odd grand on a deposit for a new house.
Unfortunately, because US equities closed out 2022 with the biggest annual drop since 2008, due to a combination of aggressive rate hikes to curb inflation, fears of recession, obviously the Russian-Ukraine war and concerns over COVID in China.
While you may not understand what any of that means, what is important to you is that you only have 16k. Welcome to life Timmy."
Fairness of opportunity, not necessarily fairness of outcome. (or something like that)
So you could say that if each child had the same value, in £££, saved for them, then that is fair. What inflation or the markets do with that money is down to luck and timing.
As for treating them as "individuals". That's fine, but be careful that you don't go too far. Like a house deposit for one, or a car, etc etc. at the exclusion of the other. That is likely to cause resentment IMO.
Save the money, give it to them at 18, job done.
If they are not happy with the amount kick them out of the house, let them live in the real world where life is not fair.