GCTT QDR.. do i continue to ignore? 23 January at 1:19PM in Parking tickets, fines & parking 7 replies 128 views

TezzLaww

Do i continue to ignore 

TezzLaww

This parking charge was from 2019. Supermarket carpark which i overstayed. 
Do i continue to ignore them as i have done for the last 4years? Thanks 

Umkomaas

TezzLaww said:

This parking charge was from 2019. Supermarket carpark which i overstayed. 
Do i continue to ignore them as i have done for the last 4years? Thanks 

Ignore unless/until you get a Letter Of/Before Claim or a County Court claim form from the Northampton CCBC. The NEWBIES FAQ Announcement, second post, will show you how to deal with both of those. 

GCTT is an Osner/ZZPS sideline, part of his debt collection outfit, and can be ignored. 

Did you receive initial ParkingEye correspondence at the time of the parking event?  On whose premises did the event take place?

patient_dream

Parking Eye clearly have gone off their rocker by using the wild bunch of OSNER and his various scam set ups

If Parking Eye want to take you to court, they do so themselves without the help of idiots in tow

And, Parking Eye will not claim £140, it will be £100

OSNER must wake up and understand that PE are just using him as a freebie debt collector .... it's costs the OSNER scam money and is FREE to PE.  ... WHO REALLY IS THE JOKER/FOOL IN THE PACK ?

As said if you get a real letter before claim from Parking Eye come back here.  

So you understand, the OSNER jokers cannot pass it to QDR as it's not their debt

I would keep that letter just in case it goes to court.  Parking Eye won a case in the Supreme court as Barry Beavis said the parking was unreasonable. The court ruled that the charge was reasonable as it included the costs of operating the scheme.
NOTHING TO DO WITH FAKE ADD-ONS .... 

In a nutshell, anything that is connected to the OSNER scam is simply a dream world fabrication

THE OSNER SCAM
Created by OSNER and approved by the UNREGULATED BPA

TezzLaww

Umkomaas said:

TezzLaww said:

This parking charge was from 2019. Supermarket carpark which i overstayed. 
Do i continue to ignore them as i have done for the last 4years? Thanks 

Ignore unless/until you get a Letter Of/Before Claim or a County Court claim form from the Northampton CCBC. The NEWBIES FAQ Announcement, second post, will show you how to deal with both of those. 

GCTT is an Osner/ZZPS sideline, part of his debt collection outfit, and can be ignored. 

Did you receive initial ParkingEye correspondence at the time of the parking event?  On whose premises did the event take place?

Thank you for messaging a reply. I originally got the "fine" for overstaying in an Asda carpark and it was parking eye. Its from 2019 so thought theyd have dropped it by now. Zzps were the first threatening letters. Then its now gctt. So continue to ignore? Thanks!

TezzLaww

patient_dream said:

Parking Eye clearly have gone off their rocker by using the wild bunch of OSNER and his various scam set ups

If Parking Eye want to take you to court, they do so themselves without the help of idiots in tow

And, Parking Eye will not claim £140, it will be £100

OSNER must wake up and understand that PE are just using him as a freebie debt collector .... it's costs the OSNER scam money and is FREE to PE.  ... WHO REALLY IS THE JOKER/FOOL IN THE PACK ?

As said if you get a real letter before claim from Parking Eye come back here.  

So you understand, the OSNER jokers cannot pass it to QDR as it's not their debt

I would keep that letter just in case it goes to court.  Parking Eye won a case in the Supreme court as Barry Beavis said the parking was unreasonable. The court ruled that the charge was reasonable as it included the costs of operating the scheme.
NOTHING TO DO WITH FAKE ADD-ONS .... 

In a nutshell, anything that is connected to the OSNER scam is simply a dream world fabrication

THE OSNER SCAM
Created by OSNER and approved by the UNREGULATED BPA

 Thank you for messaging me a reply. The car has since been sold. My husband owned it. I was a named driver and was the one who overstayed in the asda carpark in 2019. They wouldnt have the footage of me driving it so cant prove who the fine is to be paid by.. is that right? I read they cant keep your picture/video as it breaches gdpr? So they cant/wont be able to prove this anyway will they? Thank you for all your help 

Coupon-mad

Sorry but all of those assumptions are wrong - of course they retain those images ready for a court claim - and they don't even have to know who was driving.

It isn't a fine.

They can hold the keeper liable. Assuming you are not in Scotland.

B789

TezzLaww said:

My husband owned it. I was a named driver and was the one who overstayed in the asda carpark in 2019

You just admitted to being the driver. Why do that? I assume that the claim is against your husband as the RK.