We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Deleted as TMI

sourpuss2021
Posts: 607 Forumite

Deleted as TMI
0
Comments
-
Guidance is here
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/236962/hbgm-bw2-assessment-of-income.pdf
W2.310 onwardsUsually income will be taken based on previous year trading figures (W2.330).Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.0 -
Deleted as TMI
0 -
I don’t have an opinion on that. Basis is that income will be based on trading accounts (presumably therefore normal tax rules would be applied).Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.0
-
Deleted as TMI
0 -
Have I no opinion - all I could do was provide the guidance so you could refer to it.
In principle however capital that is in a business account is not personal capital.Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.1 -
Deleted as TMI
0 -
sourpuss2021 said:Thanks, Calcotti.Also, I've had potential tenants offering to pay 6 months rent upfront, together with a 5-week deposit. This sum would be more than £6k but less than £16k. It would be received by me personally because they'd be signing a tenancy with me.If that happened I was thinking I would just immediately pay 6 months rent on the head landlord/owner, reducing the amount I had in my bank account to below £6k.But that might be a bad idea because if the subtenants need to terminate the agreement due to job loss or relationship breakup, I won't easily be able to refund their money. (I suppose I would just not give them the possibility of a refund - no break clause in first six months). I also don't want to create an expectation from the head landlord that six-monthly payments could become a regular occurence, because the subtenants would revert to paying monthly from month seven.I appreciate this is the benefits forum not a tax or property one. But my question is - from the perspective of how a Housing Benefit olficer would view it, would it be a bad idea to have 6 months of rent (for this other property) sitting in my bank account as a lump sum, which I would then pay it on to the landlord on a monthly basis? It would be cash at hand, that had to be paid out later as a necessary business expense. My profit would remain the same, £241.66/m, but I'd be sitting on a pile. And I do have a seperate bank account in which I could hold this advance rent.
Also - in your profit figure - isn't there a cost to you from renting it in the first place? Your figures only seem to account for your renovation costs plus the income from the sub-tenant. Will there be other expenses? e.g. safety checks or is that all covered by the main landlord?1 -
Deleted as TMI
0 -
Deleted as TMI
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards