We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

How much is covered by uk government if Investment house goes bust

13»

Comments

  • HappyHarry
    HappyHarry Posts: 1,898 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 26 January 2021 at 11:39AM
    Also worth noting that if the investment fund house goes bust and has no money of their own left. The administrators have the legal right to take your money as their fees and pay you what is left over. So they could sell your shares, use some of it for their wages and pay you the rest.
    The first £85,000 of which is covered by the FSCS.

    With platform providers / fund houses providing services to hundreds of thousands if not millions of investors, the administration costs per investor should be smaller than the £85,000 of cover.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser. Any comments I make here are intended for information / discussion only. Nothing I post here should be construed as advice. If you are looking for individual financial advice, please contact a local Independent Financial Adviser.
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,559 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    Also worth noting that if the investment fund house goes bust and has no money of their own left. The administrators have the legal right to take your money as their fees and pay you what is left over. So they could sell your shares, use some of it for their wages and pay you the rest.
    I believe, but may be wrong, that the fees the adminisatrators take would relate to the cost of recovering the assets rather then general costs.  This should not be an issue for mainstream funds held with a mainstream platform.  This was a particular issue with the collapse of SVS which was not a mainstream platform and was often used for non-mainstream investments.

    In any case a mainstream investment house going bust would almost certainly be bought by one of its competitors.  The value of the customer base should be worth more than the cost of administration though any buy-out would probably take place prior to the investment house failing.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.