We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Conveyancing - tenants in situ
Comments
-
Thanks. Yeh, I realise it isn't really my concern - I was wondering how this process works rather than concerned for my security with this one. The issue in the other thread is what actually affects me. I've been told by the landlord that he won't be dictated to and I will have to depart on his timeline and he expects me to be out on a particular date. I said in that case I'll await his serving notice for that date, to which he says "if you're going to be difficult, this is not going to end well". Bit of a bully really. I'm now ignoring him.
Someone above asked about other tenants. There's currently only one and he's just here for 2 weeks without a contract, very informal, and leaves on Saturday. Although it's technically a shared house, the landlord hasn't been able to fill the second room long term.0 -
He doesn't need a written contract. He occupies a room, pays rent, and a tenancy is thereby created. No such thing as an 'informal tenancy'. So he can now stay at least 6 months if he wishes.
This is not going to end well for your LL if he exchanges without vacant possession: he'll be sued for at least the value of the deposit by the buyer.No free lunch, and no free laptop
1 -
Hope you're keeping records of all the landlord's threats - taping your phone calls (many apps will do it on mobile), keeping emails, notes of verbal conversation etc. He's heading for real trouble if he doesn't change course. This is really important - if you have evidence of this kind of behaviour you have him over a barrel.
As to the process - as others have said, before you buy, you visit the property, ascertain it is empty. If it is not empty, you verbally enquire with the vendor/EA about whether it will be, and they assure you that it will. You inform your solicitor of the situation. When you exchange contracts, there will be a clause in there requiring the vendor to deliver the property with vacant possession.
If they do not, then they become liable for damages, and those can be very severe in a situation where a property buyer ends up with a surprise tenant. They would need to pay the costs of managing the delayed removals, the costs of alternative accommodation (potentially for months), legal costs, all the costs basically. Then there might be an element of punitive damages for the serious hassle involved.
That is why it is so rare for a vendor to actually exchange contracts without already first securing vacant possession (unless the buyer wants a tenanted property of course).2 -
Neither the vendor nor the estate agent can in the real world assure anyone that the property will be emptyprinceofpounds said:
As to the process - as others have said, before you buy, you visit the property, ascertain it is empty. If it is not empty, you verbally enquire with the vendor/EA about whether it will be, and they assure you that it will. You inform your solicitor of the situation. When you exchange contracts, there will be a clause in there requiring the vendor to deliver the property with vacant possession.
They can only state that their understanding and expectation is that it will be empty.
As stated the vendor is in a world of pain if that understanding is mistaken and the purchaser does not obtain vacant possession1 -
Thanks everyone. Yes, I have all communication recorded, as so far everything has been by WhatsApp. I hadn't thought about recording phone calls but will get an app to do that in case I need it. I haven't decided what to do in September yet, i.e. when he thinks he's getting rid of me. Bizarrely I've already made two offers to end the arrangement legally (I suggested I give notice or that we negotiate a mutually agreed early end to the tenancy), but he has refused both because they are not "on his terms". He actually prefers his illegal way and a load of bullying.0
-
Explain to him everything he's suggesting are "not on my terms".
Good luck. Shelter (the experts) free helpline is 0808 800 4444 but expect a wait from this excellent but overworked charity1 -
Is the property being sold via an estate agent? If so, call them to advise you are a tenant and you have not been given notice by the landlord1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards